Anonymous wrote:It is another example of poor leadership. Which looks to be in this process of correcting. For some reason the steering committee set up a pay what you wish format with no vetting for need. It's absurd. Financial aid is a separate entity.
Anonymous wrote:It is another example of poor leadership. Which looks to be in this process of correcting. For some reason the steering committee set up a pay what you wish format with no vetting for need. It's absurd. Financial aid is a separate entity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No parents were given 2 choices of tuition. The full cost of education or a lower amount for some reason. Anyone that could not afford those options were directed to financial aid through the ADW.
Interesting! So, does the higher amount reflect the true cost of education at the school given the current enrollment numbers? And the lower cost is perhaps more in line with last's year's tuition rates? Explain more! I've never heard of any other school doing this. Is it an appeal to conscience?
Anonymous wrote:No parents were given 2 choices of tuition. The full cost of education or a lower amount for some reason. Anyone that could not afford those options were directed to financial aid through the ADW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now to face the 2 tiered pricing problem. Ridiculous that some parents are not carrying their weight.
Let's take one evening to just be happy. (Says a parent paying the higher price.)
Anonymous wrote:It's a short victory until the tiered tuition is handled. Otherwise, resentment will prevail.
Anonymous wrote:Now to face the 2 tiered pricing problem. Ridiculous that some parents are not carrying their weight.