Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
v
Not true, The majority aren’t even from the DCC let alone Blair. Most feed from Takoma but those aren’t all inbounds. They wouldn’t be majority either if it wasn’t for the set aside seats. They have to anchor 25 seats for TP or they would be taken up on merit by west county kids.
Correct, the majority of Blair Magnet students are from Takoma which is in the DCC and boundary for Blair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
v
Not true, The majority aren’t even from the DCC let alone Blair. Most feed from Takoma but those aren’t all inbounds. They wouldn’t be majority either if it wasn’t for the set aside seats. They have to anchor 25 seats for TP or they would be taken up on merit by west county kids.
Correct, the majority of Blair Magnet students are from Takoma which is in the DCC and boundary for Blair.
I don't think that is the case. The Blair magnet students have about half from Takoma. So that leaves the other half definitely not from the Blair boundary. For those from Takoma, many are from the TPMS magnet program and not in-bound either.
So overall, students from the Blair boundary are certainly not the "majority".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is not a better school yet, but will be in 3 years.
Why? Because when Blair moves to Kennedy the OOB students wont attend??
Two reasons.
1. MS admission pattern changed. They are no longer challenging top students in the county to the max, preparing them for Blair. There used to be several 8th graders every year acing Functions.
2. Blair still kind of admits on merit, but not really because all the have is MAP, grades, COGAT. 3 years ago, there was a comprehensive test, resume, letters of recommendation. Once current sophomores graduate, Blair won't be the same. It will still be good, but not the same.
This is all bogus. You are woefully uninformed. Current Freshman all went trough the exact same process as current Sophomores. Nothing changed. The only thing that has changed for next year's class is the test used. Everything else application-wise is the same. You are confusing this w/ MSM changes (& BTW this year's 6th grade class at TPMS seems great). Just can it.
I love Blair and hope that you are right, so please forgive me for not replying point by point.
Also, BTW, the freshman Functions class is full. There aren't just "a few." It seems you mean well, but your fears carry so much bias. Tread carefully, and check your judgments. Current 7th grade and up are on exactly the same program/app process as 10th graders (except that starting last year w/ current 8th graders, it was online, and they used Cogat instead of the test that Pearson had designed, which I personally think is a shame). Also, reserve judgment on the current MSM program and kids. FWIW, the MS program has not changed except for introducing coding earlier as many kids are exposed to it earlier (this decision had nothing to do w/ admin process just general increase in tech savvy of kids overall). Some of what people think of as "ability" is really high proficiency resulting from extreme enrichment and prep. I like the idea of getting more kids in who haven't had those options (preferably in ES, so they can get some enrichment). And, frankly, the county just needs more program slots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
v
Not true, The majority aren’t even from the DCC let alone Blair. Most feed from Takoma but those aren’t all inbounds. They wouldn’t be majority either if it wasn’t for the set aside seats. They have to anchor 25 seats for TP or they would be taken up on merit by west county kids.
Correct, the majority of Blair Magnet students are from Takoma which is in the DCC and boundary for Blair.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
v
Not true, The majority aren’t even from the DCC let alone Blair. Most feed from Takoma but those aren’t all inbounds. They wouldn’t be majority either if it wasn’t for the set aside seats. They have to anchor 25 seats for TP or they would be taken up on merit by west county kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is not a better school yet, but will be in 3 years.
Why? Because when Blair moves to Kennedy the OOB students wont attend??
Two reasons.
1. MS admission pattern changed. They are no longer challenging top students in the county to the max, preparing them for Blair. There used to be several 8th graders every year acing Functions.
2. Blair still kind of admits on merit, but not really because all the have is MAP, grades, COGAT. 3 years ago, there was a comprehensive test, resume, letters of recommendation. Once current sophomores graduate, Blair won't be the same. It will still be good, but not the same.
This is all bogus. You are woefully uninformed. Current Freshman all went trough the exact same process as current Sophomores. Nothing changed. The only thing that has changed for next year's class is the test used. Everything else application-wise is the same. You are confusing this w/ MSM changes (& BTW this year's 6th grade class at TPMS seems great). Just can it.
I love Blair and hope that you are right, so please forgive me for not replying point by point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is not a better school yet, but will be in 3 years.
Why? Because when Blair moves to Kennedy the OOB students wont attend??
Two reasons.
1. MS admission pattern changed. They are no longer challenging top students in the county to the max, preparing them for Blair. There used to be several 8th graders every year acing Functions.
2. Blair still kind of admits on merit, but not really because all the have is MAP, grades, COGAT. 3 years ago, there was a comprehensive test, resume, letters of recommendation. Once current sophomores graduate, Blair won't be the same. It will still be good, but not the same.
This is all bogus. You are woefully uninformed. Current Freshman all went trough the exact same process as current Sophomores. Nothing changed. The only thing that has changed for next year's class is the test used. Everything else application-wise is the same. You are confusing this w/ MSM changes (& BTW this year's 6th grade class at TPMS seems great). Just can it.
I love Blair and hope that you are right, so please forgive me for not replying point by point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is not a better school yet, but will be in 3 years.
Why? Because when Blair moves to Kennedy the OOB students wont attend??
Two reasons.
1. MS admission pattern changed. They are no longer challenging top students in the county to the max, preparing them for Blair. There used to be several 8th graders every year acing Functions.
2. Blair still kind of admits on merit, but not really because all the have is MAP, grades, COGAT. 3 years ago, there was a comprehensive test, resume, letters of recommendation. Once current sophomores graduate, Blair won't be the same. It will still be good, but not the same.
This is all bogus. You are woefully uninformed. Current Freshman all went trough the exact same process as current Sophomores. Nothing changed. The only thing that has changed for next year's class is the test used. Everything else application-wise is the same. You are confusing this w/ MSM changes (& BTW this year's 6th grade class at TPMS seems great). Just can it.
Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is not a better school yet, but will be in 3 years.
Why? Because when Blair moves to Kennedy the OOB students wont attend??
Two reasons.
1. MS admission pattern changed. They are no longer challenging top students in the county to the max, preparing them for Blair. There used to be several 8th graders every year acing Functions.
2. Blair still kind of admits on merit, but not really because all the have is MAP, grades, COGAT. 3 years ago, there was a comprehensive test, resume, letters of recommendation. Once current sophomores graduate, Blair won't be the same. It will still be good, but not the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/
Did not used to be the case, but with new rules, who knows.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No the combined magnets SMACS and CAPS is only 12% not 20% of the Blair students -which is less than 400 kids most of whom are in CAPS not SMACs. SMACs is tiny.
A large number of which live in-boundary, to begin with...
Yes, in boundary students make up the largest cohorts in these programs/