Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
“Twitter will be held fully accountable.”

Enough is Enough.

Twitter is a private company. It can set its own or no rules as it wishes. In my private business, I do not do business with those who are not vaccinated. Turned away someone today. Great fun. Do not want to do business with idiots.

Sure, that is your right. And then other people should be able to deny service to other people because they don't like the look of them or their medical or criminal histories.

The left needs to understand that Twitter is NOT legally liable as if it were a private company. They currently have special legal protections as if they're a public space because they're supposed to be unbiased. But they still censor some posts/people just because they don't agree with their political messaging. That's the problem. Twitter is trying to have their cake and eat it, too. They need to choose one or the other - they are a private company, can censor whatever they want but they are legally liable for what's on the site; or they are a public space, not liable for anything written, but cannot censor political messages that they don't agree with.

Anonymous wrote:
“Twitter will be held fully accountable.”

Enough is Enough.

Twitter is a private company. It can set its own or no rules as it wishes. In my private business, I do not do business with those who are not vaccinated. Turned away someone today. Great fun. Do not want to do business with idiots.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s what taxpayers were spending money on during the Trump administration:

We’re not out of the woods yet, but I’m glad we’re out of the swamp.

Yup, the back to normal DOJ has withdrawn the subpoena.

Anonymous wrote:Here’s what taxpayers were spending money on during the Trump administration:

We’re not out of the woods yet, but I’m glad we’re out of the swamp.

Here’s what taxpayers were spending money on during the Trump administration:

Anonymous wrote:His CNN lawsuit just got tossed too.

Who is funding these lawsuits?

An ethics investigator needs to do a deep dive into who is financing Nunes' legal fees. He is not reporting them as income on his financial disclosures as he should. He lists his Tulare County farm as being worth between $1001 and $15k. Is land really that cheap in CA? No home ownership listed. It seems like his connection to Tulare County is negligible. Where does he live?

https://www.opensecrets.org/personal-finances/devin-nunes/assets?cid=N00007248&year=2018

I hope the court makes Nunes pay legal fees for the frivolous lawsuits he has filed. There's probably a lot of fees piling up after two years.

His CNN lawsuit just got tossed too.

It’s long past time that who ever investigates ethics in the House look into how Nunes is paying for all these lawsuits. His job in government is his only income and his legal bills must exceed $200k this year alone.

Anonymous wrote:Twitter needs to be regulated as a public utility under common carrier laws.

It's time to strip these companies away from the individuals who control them now.

Are you a communist or a conservative? I guess you've found something that conservatives and communists agree about.

Nunes’s suit against the Washington Post gets tossed:
https://twitter.com/kateirby/status/1343640650512740352?s=21

Anonymous wrote:I’m a conservator and they hav suspended me for saying “illegal alien” while people call for assault, wishing dear to Jews. But if twitter wants to be biased in favor of lefties it is their right

Twitter seems Pro Trump. I left it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nunes is also suing McClatchy for $150 million.
https://amp.sacbee.com/latest-news/article229004754.html?__twitter_impression=true

https://www.scribd.com/document/405513426/Complaint-4-8-19-Mcclatchy-2

Excellent.

I thought Republicans despised litigation. Only for thee but not for me, yet again.

I am one who despises frivolous lawsuits. In this case, McClatchy is deserving of being sued.

Oh? What personal knowledge do you have that proves the Fresno Bee’s article is incorrect?

Crickets.

Meanwhile, a federal judge appointed by George W. Bush has tossed out a racketeering lawsuit Nunes filed last year against the private investigation firm Fusion GPS, and also signaled that pressing on with the legal battle could result in sanctions against Nunes and his attorney.
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/02/21/devin-nunes-lawsuit-trump-dossier-116675?__twitter_impression=true

Anonymous wrote:Hey everyone, take a look at https://www.devinnunes2020.com/.

You'll learn a lot about him! For instance, check out what happens on his family's farm in Iowa. Very enlightening!

Yeah he sued to stop that article about his family farm in Iowa. If it’s true his suit is frivolous.

He’s going to go through some things.

Hey everyone, take a look at https://www.devinnunes2020.com/.

You'll learn a lot about him! For instance, check out what happens on his family's farm in Iowa. Very enlightening!