Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of low/high incompatibility in this thread; seems a shame.
I have a hypothesis that marriage causes small imbalances to be large ones. Being the lower libido one means that you'll be the recipient of at least occasional unwanted advances. At first, it's no big deal -- the imbalance isn't that big, so the unwanted advance isn't that frequent. But, it makes you just a little less likely to want sex -- that leads to a greater frequency of times when the advance is unwanted. And it snowballs. You don't initiate because eventually there is no time to recharge your battery. The resentments grow.
On the high libido side, at first the rejections are no big deal. There's always tomorrow night. But then the rejections accumulate -- you start being unsure about when you'll be able to have sex again. That makes you want it more. Acceptance of your sexual advances become intertwined with your feelings about whether your spouse loves you, finds you attractive, etc. Then you notice she never initiates -- that's proof that she doesn't find you attractive. Your sexual initiations become more tentative -- nonsexual interactions become less loving. That leads to less and less sex. And on and on.
So, what started as mildly mismatched libidos become wildly mismatched libidos.
Wow, you have perfectly described what happened in our marriage. It's spiraling down, not sure my wife realizes how bad but I don't know if we have a future together.
I totally agree. I think sexual compatibility may be the most important aspect to consider when deciding on marriage. My first husband and I were not and marriage failed quickly. Second time around I made sure we were on the same page. It's sad but I don't think many people realize this when marrying.
How clueless are you. It's not that women aren't horny when we get married, it's that we lose the desire after years of marriage. You can't predict this going in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of low/high incompatibility in this thread; seems a shame.
I have a hypothesis that marriage causes small imbalances to be large ones. Being the lower libido one means that you'll be the recipient of at least occasional unwanted advances. At first, it's no big deal -- the imbalance isn't that big, so the unwanted advance isn't that frequent. But, it makes you just a little less likely to want sex -- that leads to a greater frequency of times when the advance is unwanted. And it snowballs. You don't initiate because eventually there is no time to recharge your battery. The resentments grow.
On the high libido side, at first the rejections are no big deal. There's always tomorrow night. But then the rejections accumulate -- you start being unsure about when you'll be able to have sex again. That makes you want it more. Acceptance of your sexual advances become intertwined with your feelings about whether your spouse loves you, finds you attractive, etc. Then you notice she never initiates -- that's proof that she doesn't find you attractive. Your sexual initiations become more tentative -- nonsexual interactions become less loving. That leads to less and less sex. And on and on.
So, what started as mildly mismatched libidos become wildly mismatched libidos.
Wow, you have perfectly described what happened in our marriage. It's spiraling down, not sure my wife realizes how bad but I don't know if we have a future together.
I totally agree. I think sexual compatibility may be the most important aspect to consider when deciding on marriage. My first husband and I were not and marriage failed quickly. Second time around I made sure we were on the same page. It's sad but I don't think many people realize this when marrying. [/quote]
How clueless are you. It's not that women aren't horny when we get married, it's that we lose the desire after years of marriage. You can't predict this going in.
Then either you need to figure out how to get the desire back, move on to someone else, or agree on having an open marriage (b/c your spouse might be bored too). Or I guess you can just live with having a sexless marriage, but that seems pretty boring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of low/high incompatibility in this thread; seems a shame.
I have a hypothesis that marriage causes small imbalances to be large ones. Being the lower libido one means that you'll be the recipient of at least occasional unwanted advances. At first, it's no big deal -- the imbalance isn't that big, so the unwanted advance isn't that frequent. But, it makes you just a little less likely to want sex -- that leads to a greater frequency of times when the advance is unwanted. And it snowballs. You don't initiate because eventually there is no time to recharge your battery. The resentments grow.
On the high libido side, at first the rejections are no big deal. There's always tomorrow night. But then the rejections accumulate -- you start being unsure about when you'll be able to have sex again. That makes you want it more. Acceptance of your sexual advances become intertwined with your feelings about whether your spouse loves you, finds you attractive, etc. Then you notice she never initiates -- that's proof that she doesn't find you attractive. Your sexual initiations become more tentative -- nonsexual interactions become less loving. That leads to less and less sex. And on and on.
So, what started as mildly mismatched libidos become wildly mismatched libidos.
Wow, you have perfectly described what happened in our marriage. It's spiraling down, not sure my wife realizes how bad but I don't know if we have a future together.
I totally agree. I think sexual compatibility may be the most important aspect to consider when deciding on marriage. My first husband and I were not and marriage failed quickly. Second time around I made sure we were on the same page. It's sad but I don't think many people realize this when marrying. [/quote]
How clueless are you. It's not that women aren't horny when we get married, it's that we lose the desire after years of marriage. You can't predict this going in.
Anonymous wrote:Lesbians in ling term relationships have far, far less sex than hetero women married to men. For example, only 1% lesbian couples have sex 3x a week or more in a long term relationship.
Women wanting less sex than men is biological, and as seen her much of the sex in hetero relationships is a function of love and compromise rather than desire. If men can get this through their heads, they can stop taking rejection so personal
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For me, pretty close to never would be fine. But he needs it every day so we average 1-2 times a week most weeks.
Why never? And why stay?
I have no drive, once we get started its between fine and good but I don't need it.
I stay because I love him and we have kids.
Reading these responses, my situation seems common, women want far less sex than we end up having. This is called common knowledge, men have higher sex drives.
Anonymous wrote:Lesbians in ling term relationships have far, far less sex than hetero women married to men. For example, only 1% lesbian couples have sex 3x a week or more in a long term relationship.
Women wanting less sex than men is biological, and as seen her much of the sex in hetero relationships is a function of love and compromise rather than desire. If men can get this through their heads, they can stop taking rejection so personal
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lesbians in ling term relationships have far, far less sex than hetero women married to men. For example, only 1% lesbian couples have sex 3x a week or more in a long term relationship.
Women wanting less sex than men is biological, and as seen her much of the sex in hetero relationships is a function of love and compromise rather than desire. If men can get this through their heads, they can stop taking rejection so personal
Such low drive women should marry other women. If you marry a man and expect his fidelity, this comes with a responsibility to meet his sexual needs. If that’s a problem, don’t marry a man.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lesbians in ling term relationships have far, far less sex than hetero women married to men. For example, only 1% lesbian couples have sex 3x a week or more in a long term relationship.
Women wanting less sex than men is biological, and as seen her much of the sex in hetero relationships is a function of love and compromise rather than desire. If men can get this through their heads, they can stop taking rejection so personal
Such low drive women should marry other women. If you marry a man and expect his fidelity, this comes with a responsibility to meet his sexual needs. If that’s a problem, don’t marry a man.
Anonymous wrote:Lesbians in ling term relationships have far, far less sex than hetero women married to men. For example, only 1% lesbian couples have sex 3x a week or more in a long term relationship.
Women wanting less sex than men is biological, and as seen her much of the sex in hetero relationships is a function of love and compromise rather than desire. If men can get this through their heads, they can stop taking rejection so personal
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Once a week is what we do, too. If we can fit another time in, great, but often it doesn’t work out. We’re both happy with it, though.
Same.
Anonymous wrote:Is never an inappropriate answer? I think my husband would agree which is a pretty good clue that we will soon be moving on.