Anonymous wrote:DC can't serve kids of all backgrounds and SES better by offering more differentiated instruction vs. academic tracking at the MS level because there isn't a high SES-low SES achievement gap in this particular city, there's an achievement chasm.
When you've got 6 or 8 kids reading at a 3rd or 4th grade level in a 6th grade ELA class of 25 or 30 students, along with another 6 or 8 kids reading at an 8th or 9th grade level, the class doesn't work well. This is true no matter how hard a skilled teacher might attempt to differentiate. The class tends to become disruptive, because instruction can't be pitched at a level that will engage most of the students.
In our family's experience, a public MS is much better off moving away from pretending that differentiation within the classroom is the answer in the face of a vast achievement gap it didn't create and can't close. What I've seen at SH in the last five years are the tangible benefits of ending the pretense that one school can erase the brutal effects of multi-generational poverty in the District.
As SH turns into a real neighborhood school 40 years after the Cluster was set up, most of the kids' academic needs are now being met. The school is stronger, happier, more orderly and more functional as a result.
Anonymous wrote:DC can't serve kids of all backgrounds and SES better by offering more differentiated instruction vs. academic tracking at the MS level because there isn't a high SES-low SES achievement gap in this particular city, there's an achievement chasm.
When you've got 6 or 8 kids reading at a 3rd or 4th grade level in a 6th grade ELA class of 25 or 30 students, along with another 6 or 8 kids reading at an 8th or 9th grade level, the class doesn't work well. This is true no matter how hard a skilled teacher might attempt to differentiate. The class tends to become disruptive, because instruction can't be pitched at a level that will engage most of the students.
In our family's experience, a public MS is much better off moving away from pretending that differentiation within the classroom is the answer in the face of a vast achievement gap it didn't create and can't close. What I've seen at SH in the last five years are the tangible benefits of ending the pretense that one school can erase the brutal effects of multi-generational poverty in the District.
As SH turns into a real neighborhood school 40 years after the Cluster was set up, most of the kids' academic needs are now being met. The school is stronger, happier, more orderly and more functional as a result.
Anonymous wrote: I am a white parent who lives in Brookland. I would prefer to send my kid to our neighborhood MS because of proximity. It would be so much easier. One problem is it doesn't offer the language my kid is currently learning at a charter. The other issue is lack of diversity. My black friends (whose kids are in my kid's class) discouraged me from even checking out Brookland Middle and said they wouldn't send their kids there.
I went to a middle school in another state where there were drive-by shootings near the school periodically and gang issues as well as drugs were present. Yet the school offered honors classes and options for kids of all learning abilities. I was in classes with bright kids, kids and in classes with grade-level and below-grade level kids. SES also varied in all of my classes. I survived and did well.
Why can't DC serve kids of all backgrounds and SES better by offering more options/differentiated instruction in middle school? Wouldn't that be a way to help all kids reach their potential? I don't get it.
Anonymous wrote:Likewise I think if lower performing students can take the classes with added help that’s ok too. We don’t want two systems within one school. This was discussed on KoJo Nnamadi today with the Wilson HS principal and Ward 4 SBoE rep O’Leary.
Anonymous wrote:As a longtime Cluster/SH parent, I can tell you that the introduction of humanities tracking at the school has been a great leap forward for teachers and students alike.
When my oldest started at SH, the high and low-performing students were obviously short-changed in humanities classes in a big way. Teachers could only pretend to serve these kids well. There was already a critical mass of strong humanities students at Hobson, warranting the creation of honors classes, but myopic DCPS policy and a poor leadership got in the way. We had to supplement a good deal to keep our student working at or above grade level, particularly where writing instruction was concerned, and heard reports of disruptive low-performing students acting out in class because they struggled to absorb what was being taught.
My youngest has been in honors humanities classes at Hobson since 6th grade and the difference has been night and day. We no longer need to supplement and in-class behavioral problems are a closed chapter. I find that those who question the need for honors classes in a neighborhood school in DC lack relevant experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the need for separate honors classes rather than just differentiated material and requirements for your student? I’m not interested in the social concerns most of you have.
For classes such as math or foreign language, it's really hard. Imagine a 6th-grade class where some students are taking math 6, some are in pre-algebra and others are in algebra. Unless you are doing an online curriculum or flipped classroom, I don't think it will work.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the need for separate honors classes rather than just differentiated material and requirements for your student? I’m not interested in the social concerns most of you have.