Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.
Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.
Looking at average GPA here:
UMCP 4.3
Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0
UVA 4.1
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.
This data may come from Common Data Sets, though, which comes directly from the colleges. What I've seen is publics like UNC Chapel Hill may have higher GPAs than any top private. (UNC-CH also has higher GPAs than UVA and W&M, BTW.) This may just mean those states have grade inflation at the high school level.
Colleges are permitted to submit GPA data in their common data set as they see fit. Some reports contain unweighted, while others have weighted, recalculated, or no GPA data at all. The UMCP average GPA is obviously weighted and is pretty worthless considering all of the MCPS kids with ridiculously inflated GPAs in the mix.
Agree and I think that is the whole point of the issue here. How can kids in non-weighted schools even compete. I know kids in top college prep schools with great unweighted GPA's getting into ivy's, but getting rejected from UVA and UMCP. That is fine for the families that can afford top private colleges. But for a family on financial aid at Sidwell (with no AP's offered, but obvious high rigor) as a Maryland resident, may only be able to afford UMCP. 25-30% of the kids at those type of schools are on financial aid. Where do they end up I wonder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.
Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.
Looking at average GPA here:
UMCP 4.3
Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0
UVA 4.1
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.
This data may come from Common Data Sets, though, which comes directly from the colleges. What I've seen is publics like UNC Chapel Hill may have higher GPAs than any top private. (UNC-CH also has higher GPAs than UVA and W&M, BTW.) This may just mean those states have grade inflation at the high school level.
Colleges are permitted to submit GPA data in their common data set as they see fit. Some reports contain unweighted, while others have weighted, recalculated, or no GPA data at all. The UMCP average GPA is obviously weighted and is pretty worthless considering all of the MCPS kids with ridiculously inflated GPAs in the mix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.
Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.
Looking at average GPA here:
UMCP 4.3
Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0
UVA 4.1
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.
This data may come from Common Data Sets, though, which comes directly from the colleges. What I've seen is publics like UNC Chapel Hill may have higher GPAs than any top private. (UNC-CH also has higher GPAs than UVA and W&M, BTW.) This may just mean those states have grade inflation at the high school level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.
Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.
Looking at average GPA here:
UMCP 4.3
Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0
UVA 4.1
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.
This data may come from Common Data Sets, though, which comes directly from the colleges. What I've seen is publics like UNC Chapel Hill may have higher GPAs than any top private. (UNC-CH also has higher GPAs than UVA and W&M, BTW.) This may just mean those states have grade inflation at the high school level.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
Exactly. They don’t use the high school weighting. They use their own.
Well I have yet to see any student under a 4.0 get into UMCP this year on college confidential unless their weighted was above 4.0. I highly doubt the kids admitted here are smarter than these top schools with lower GPA averages. Something doesn’t add up here.
Looking at average GPA here:
UMCP 4.3
Penn 3.9
Brown 4.0
UC Berkeley 3.8
Harvard 4.1
UMich 3.8
MIT 4.1
Wisc 3.8
Notre Dame 4.0
BU 3.6
Georgetown 4.0
USC 3.7
Williams 4.0
UVA 4.1
If you’re using College Confidential as your data source you’re doing it wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if your HE doesn’t weight AP and honors courses, you are screwed for UMD? Most private schools don’t weight these classes.
My private school kid just got into UMD-CP Honors College. No weighting.
And what was his GPA and scores?
I am not going to out him, but they are good.
Another one. Unless you give your kids name outright, no one is going to know. Whatever.
Small private school, got into Honors College. It’s a limited universe of people.
Why aren't you saying what his weighted GPA is then? Why do you keep responding to people saying "nope" and then posting your ONE child got in from ONE private, but can't post anything.There are over 103 ranked private high schools in Maryland and over 200 total. No one is outing you.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if your HE doesn’t weight AP and honors courses, you are screwed for UMD? Most private schools don’t weight these classes.
My private school kid just got into UMD-CP Honors College. No weighting.
And what was his GPA and scores?
I am not going to out him, but they are good.
Another one. Unless you give your kids name outright, no one is going to know. Whatever.
Small private school, got into Honors College. It’s a limited universe of people.
There are over 103 ranked private high schools in Maryland and over 200 total. No one is outing you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s just recalculating. It is not the same thing as using the high school’s weighting.
So you’re saying that the GPA of kids admitted to Maryland is higher than that of kids admitted to Harvard, Penn, MIT, Brown, Williams, etc? That is so delusional that it straddles the line between funny and scary
That is exactly what Prep Scholar says for all of these GPA’s. Just verified them all. Only ones higher are a few UC’s which specifically state they DO count and use weighted grades 10th and 11th grade. But they at least, as a state, cap OOS enrollment to 15% and have at least 6 state schools worth applying to.
Prep scholar is not a reliable source of information. If you go to the school admissions or CDS you will see where these numbers come from. In some cases they say they are admitted students vs. enrolled. In some cases it specifies weighted or unweighted (unless over 4.0, then obviously weighted).