Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is there still a large cut out at the Takoma Park magnet for kids from TP? Is TP considered a cluster that has the advantage of the no cohort designation for purposes of Eastern?
There is still a carve out for kids zoned for TPMS, which means most but not all of Takoma Park and a slice of Silver Spring.
Anonymous wrote:Is there still a large cut out at the Takoma Park magnet for kids from TP? Is TP considered a cluster that has the advantage of the no cohort designation for purposes of Eastern?
Anonymous wrote:Give me a break. Get off your elitist high horse. Maybe their child actually NEEDS a magnet. Maybe their child is checked out at school otherwise or has an IQ of 160 and is otherwise depressed and unhappy. Maybe their family is dirt poor and they see the magnets as their way to a better life.
I do not prep my child but I see nothing wrong with prepping and I think if it helps their child they deserve to get in. You act like it's easy for these kids to go to these programs and study. They work hard. Their parents sacrifice other opportunities to send them to these classes. If they do well they deserve to get in.
I'm from NY where most of the kids who go to Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech and Sty are poor and their parents managed to squeeze money out of their budget to take prep classes. FWIW, many of the poorest families are Asian.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People still don't get it?
It no longer has anything to do with who is smarter, CES or non-CES. It is all about the COHORT!!!
Talk to your local middle school principle and ask the school to provide HIGH-QUALITY, ENRICHED education to the cohort!
This. They now put everyone who scores at an above average level into their “ qualified” pool and then use the peer cohort criteria to make the final decisions. It is no longer about which kids are the smartest per test scores or who have the greatest intellectual drive/thirst for knowledge per teacher recommendations and student essays
I just hope they don’t do this to the high school Magnet application process. There is less reason to worry about outliers in low performing high schools since every MCPS high school offers a robust selection of AP courses
Teacher/Parent recommendations were never a reliable or consistent metric.
+1
Look, I get it. I have a kid who would dramatically benefit from the teacher/parent recommendations. Attentive, curious, easy to get along with, high-level and unique extracurriculars, etc.
But I also know that none of these things make my child more qualified for a magnet seat than a child who is more easily distracted, or has a tougher personality, or whose parents haven't had the resources to invest in 10,000 hours of practice by the age of 11.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is accurate, more or less. MCPS has described a two step selection process. First they identify "highly able" children (not "above average" as PP attests) based on some cut offs or composite scores they haven't released.
Kids who are FARMS or have ever had ESOL services get an extra boost.
They use this list to start looking at "peer cohort" and identify outliers. Last year they also went back after this and refined the group of selected kids again to make sure at least one child was included from every feeder school and to make sure the group is gender balanced.
They no longer rank the kids globally in the way they did in the past so they are no longer taking the kids who have the top 300 scores in the county or those whose teacher recommendations/essays show they have a thirst for more.
These are facts.
The problem historically is kids with the highest scores from high SES areas are mostly able to achieve that through massive outside enrichment. They'll be fine no matter where they land. So looking to boost the kids who are doing well with fewer resources makes more sense.
Anonymous wrote:This is accurate, more or less. MCPS has described a two step selection process. First they identify "highly able" children (not "above average" as PP attests) based on some cut offs or composite scores they haven't released.
Kids who are FARMS or have ever had ESOL services get an extra boost.
They use this list to start looking at "peer cohort" and identify outliers. Last year they also went back after this and refined the group of selected kids again to make sure at least one child was included from every feeder school and to make sure the group is gender balanced.
They no longer rank the kids globally in the way they did in the past so they are no longer taking the kids who have the top 300 scores in the county or those whose teacher recommendations/essays show they have a thirst for more.
These are facts.
Anonymous wrote:This is accurate, more or less. MCPS has described a two step selection process. First they identify "highly able" children (not "above average" as PP attests) based on some cut offs or composite scores they haven't released.
Kids who are FARMS or have ever had ESOL services get an extra boost.
They use this list to start looking at "peer cohort" and identify outliers. Last year they also went back after this and refined the group of selected kids again to make sure at least one child was included from every feeder school and to make sure the group is gender balanced.
They no longer rank the kids globally in the way they did in the past so they are no longer taking the kids who have the top 300 scores in the county or those whose teacher recommendations/essays show they have a thirst for more.
These are facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People still don't get it?
It no longer has anything to do with who is smarter, CES or non-CES. It is all about the COHORT!!!
Talk to your local middle school principle and ask the school to provide HIGH-QUALITY, ENRICHED education to the cohort!
This. They now put everyone who scores at an above average level into their “ qualified” pool and then use the peer cohort criteria to make the final decisions. It is no longer about which kids are the smartest per test scores or who have the greatest intellectual drive/thirst for knowledge per teacher recommendations and student essays
I just hope they don’t do this to the high school Magnet application process. There is less reason to worry about outliers in low performing high schools since every MCPS high school offers a robust selection of AP courses
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People still don't get it?
It no longer has anything to do with who is smarter, CES or non-CES. It is all about the COHORT!!!
Talk to your local middle school principle and ask the school to provide HIGH-QUALITY, ENRICHED education to the cohort!
This. They now put everyone who scores at an above average level into their “ qualified” pool and then use the peer cohort criteria to make the final decisions. It is no longer about which kids are the smartest per test scores or who have the greatest intellectual drive/thirst for knowledge per teacher recommendations and student essays
I just hope they don’t do this to the high school Magnet application process. There is less reason to worry about outliers in low performing high schools since every MCPS high school offers a robust selection of AP courses
Teacher/Parent recommendations were never a reliable or consistent metric.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People still don't get it?
It no longer has anything to do with who is smarter, CES or non-CES. It is all about the COHORT!!!
Talk to your local middle school principle and ask the school to provide HIGH-QUALITY, ENRICHED education to the cohort!
This. They now put everyone who scores at an above average level into their “ qualified” pool and then use the peer cohort criteria to make the final decisions. It is no longer about which kids are the smartest per test scores or who have the greatest intellectual drive/thirst for knowledge per teacher recommendations and student essays
I just hope they don’t do this to the high school Magnet application process. There is less reason to worry about outliers in low performing high schools since every MCPS high school offers a robust selection of AP courses