Anonymous wrote:A part of me thinks Larry best is going to be more concerned with the 1st team and fixing a lot of things that have gone wrong at the spirit for years. The draft is coming fast as is pre season, if he is going to shut down spirit Va it won't happen until summer.
Anonymous wrote:What? That makes no sense. FCV does not need the Spirit or the Spirit players. That is like asking Barclays to buy Lehman Brothers as it was collapsing. Barclays waited and just picked up the assets it wanted once Lehman failed. FCV could do the same. Unless you are talking the WS pro team, it makes little sense for FCV to merge with WS VA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What? That makes no sense. FCV does not need the Spirit or the Spirit players. That is like asking Barclays to buy Lehman Brothers as it was collapsing. Barclays waited and just picked up the assets it wanted once Lehman failed. FCV could do the same. Unless you are talking the WS pro team, it makes little sense for FCV to merge with WS VA.
Did I say they needed Spirit players? No, I said they get to eliminate a competing DA. And, yes there are talented Spirit players that FCV would love to have if possible but no the players are not the motive.
Access to a pro club and eliminating a competing team ARE the motivations.
FCV has a very checkered past from a management perspective and who knows that best but Larry. Look at Loudoun for the latest reference. You have a very creative imagination. Donald, please send the federal employees back to work!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What? That makes no sense. FCV does not need the Spirit or the Spirit players. That is like asking Barclays to buy Lehman Brothers as it was collapsing. Barclays waited and just picked up the assets it wanted once Lehman failed. FCV could do the same. Unless you are talking the WS pro team, it makes little sense for FCV to merge with WS VA.
Did I say they needed Spirit players? No, I said they get to eliminate a competing DA. And, yes there are talented Spirit players that FCV would love to have if possible but no the players are not the motive.
Access to a pro club and eliminating a competing team ARE the motivations.
Anonymous wrote:What? That makes no sense. FCV does not need the Spirit or the Spirit players. That is like asking Barclays to buy Lehman Brothers as it was collapsing. Barclays waited and just picked up the assets it wanted once Lehman failed. FCV could do the same. Unless you are talking the WS pro team, it makes little sense for FCV to merge with WS VA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Spirit FCV partnership makes no sense for anyone. The guy a posts above is smoking some great stuff though!
Two years ago the merger made perfect sense to the leadership of 4 very reputable clubs.
1st BRYC
2nd Loudoun and Arlington
3rd FCV
All jumped at the opportunity to partner with Spirit. Now it makes no sense? Please explain your hesitation in believing a hand that's already been shown to you? I challenge you to go back to any thread on this board and reexamine any topic related to the age change mandate, those being awarded DA status, mergers, partnerships, etc. There will be a ton of people just like you saying, "that makes no sense". Yet, it happened. That's the beauty of hindsight. You can learn from it....or not....its up to you.
Now, I'm not saying that it's going to happen. I'm merely suggesting that one should pay attention and be prepared to make decesions.
Issue 1-a club with barely enough field space trying to merge with a club that has essentially zero field space.
Issue 2-Spirit has a working relationship with GFR. You have to buy the phony rumor that the relationship has failed for another relationship to make sense.
Issue 3-what does FCV gain now that they are established as a solid DA club? Certainly not field space!
Sure, they could merge. Lots of crazy things that make little sense happen in this world. No reason to hold your breath over it. We'll know within the next four weeks. I'm not holding my breath for the FCV merger.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.
What makes them "legitimate?" no one has legitimized them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.
Burke and Best aren't rumors; they are news. BIG news.
So what? That doesn't legitimize any of the made up crap posted in this thread. Stop blowing smoke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.
Burke and Best aren't rumors; they are news. BIG news.
So what? That doesn't legitimize any of the made up crap posted in this thread. Stop blowing smoke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.
Burke and Best aren't rumors; they are news. BIG news.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But, you get an "A' for effort in the FUD department for spreading your rumors! Try to stay off the shrooms. Nothing good comes from it. Really.
Your post is excessively defensive and hostile. You don't need to feel threatened if people speculate over the potential implications of legitimate news.
I think you meant "legitimate rumors". But your point stands.