Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Same with every other man milking the woman for her resources. The point is in "general" if you desire to be with someone vastly younger it's going to be about money for them. That's ok if both partners are getting their needs met. And the older one understands it's never going to be about real love. Many can be happy with that arrangement. Each to their own.

This has been repeatedly asserted but not proven, and remains unconvincing no matter how many times it is said.

How, exactly, is a younger woman going to get money out of an older man? (Assuming, of course, that she's not a straight-up hooker / escort / sugar baby.) How will this differ from the way a woman gets money out of a man who is in her "age range"? Give me some real-life examples.

I don't even know how you could possibly prove that an older man / younger woman relationship "is never going to be about real love". You just want that to be true because you hate the idea of older men dating younger women.

In my experience, it costs no more to date a woman who is much younger than you than it does to date a woman the same age.

And oh by the way, men do not milk women for resources.

I don't care who dates who, or what their reasons. From observation, friends, acquaintances, etc. those are my observations. Much older men want youth and beauty from the younger woman. Hence "resources" which is all good and fine. I said in "general" meaning it's not absolute, but the rule is generally it's a parasitic relationship. It can work for many years if both parties are happy.
Not to say the younger woman isn't fond of the older man, but rarely a real love relationship. I don't know why this would bother you because it's been well known for sometime. It's America and perfectly ok to buy a relationship.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Same with every other man milking the woman for her resources. The point is in "general" if you desire to be with someone vastly younger it's going to be about money for them. That's ok if both partners are getting their needs met. And the older one understands it's never going to be about real love. Many can be happy with that arrangement. Each to their own.

This has been repeatedly asserted but not proven, and remains unconvincing no matter how many times it is said.

How, exactly, is a younger woman going to get money out of an older man? (Assuming, of course, that she's not a straight-up hooker / escort / sugar baby.) How will this differ from the way a woman gets money out of a man who is in her "age range"? Give me some real-life examples.

I don't even know how you could possibly prove that an older man / younger woman relationship "is never going to be about real love". You just want that to be true because you hate the idea of older men dating younger women.

In my experience, it costs no more to date a woman who is much younger than you than it does to date a woman the same age.

And oh by the way, men do not milk women for resources.

Anonymous wrote:No- you insulting me would never bother me- you don’t know me.

You insulting all women bothers me because it shows you for the woman hating insecure that you are. After all- you’re the o e on dating websites in your 60’s taking about how women’s prime is at 22? Nah. I don’t care about your insults to me personally - but if you think that you’re somehow unusual for preferring to date young women online who are actively seeking over 60 men- and you tell yourself you impress them with your prowess- we can al see who the doll is here.

Your age isn’t ugly. I’m sure your balls look fine. It’s your personality I’m having fun teasing out. You’re ugly there, man, and I don’t mind mocking that at all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a 52 to male and have dated as young as 35 and as old as 58. Age is just a number after awhile and chemistry is more important.

If you want a real lifetime partner then you need to be compatible. Meaning similar ages, economic and social class, similar educations, etc. Thirty five is too young, and it will be about lust for you. $$$ for the 35 year old, but nothing lasting unless you're willing to finance her life. It all depends on what you want. Lots of young women are happy to date a fossil because they make excellent ATMs.

Let's face the facts -- every woman is milking a man for his resources. There's nothing a 35 year old is going to ask you to "finance" when you're 50 or 60 that she wouldn't ask you to finance if you were also 35. She wants to live with you? So what, she'd also want to do that if you were 35. If she doesn't want kids, and doesn't have kids she expects you to pay for, then there isn't much she can really ask you to pay for. I guess you could let her quit her job and sit around your house doing nothing, if you were really stupid, but I assure you that I am not that stupid.

Same with every other man milking the woman for her resources. The point is in "general" if you desire to be with someone vastly younger it's going to be about money for them. That's ok if both partners are getting their needs met. And the older one understands it's never going to be about real love. Many can be happy with that arrangement. Each to their own.

Aspie trying to take all Gramps glory.