Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing about trying to bully someone into doing what you want. One element of bullying is that the bully has to have some kind of power over the person being bullied, such as physical strength, social influence, etc. SA has no power over NA, so you're not in a position to bully them into anything. If you want their help, you need to try a different tactic because all this one is doing is causing them to roll their eyes and tune you out.
Yes, and that's exactly the problem. NA helps itself by confining AH to SA. It's not just that it creates segregated schools in SA, it's that it creates "high performing schools" in NA by allowing that portion of the county to get ever richer, ever more exclusive. It's not doable. This housing policy pits a larger, wealthier, and better resourced north against a poorer, smaller, less politically powerful south. By design.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing about trying to bully someone into doing what you want. One element of bullying is that the bully has to have some kind of power over the person being bullied, such as physical strength, social influence, etc. SA has no power over NA, so you're not in a position to bully them into anything. If you want their help, you need to try a different tactic because all this one is doing is causing them to roll their eyes and tune you out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing about trying to bully someone into doing what you want. One element of bullying is that the bully has to have some kind of power over the person being bullied, such as physical strength, social influence, etc. SA has no power over NA, so you're not in a position to bully them into anything. If you want their help, you need to try a different tactic because all this one is doing is causing them to roll their eyes and tune you out.
Not sure what tactic you're referring to here. The question was asked what NA could be doing to help. Other commentators aside, that question was answered - without snark, without calling anyone racist, with no bullying. Just what does it take to appease you? Perhaps you should tell us what SA needs to do to garner NA's help, then? Just what answer are you looking for?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contiguity is important, as is making schools be close to people's homes. Look at the Rosslyn island for middle school highschool -- there's a reason it was removed for middle school this past go around. Those kids have a very hard time getting to and from school without school buses. This makes it so they can't do after school activities and parents can't be as engaged in the school. These are not things that as a community we should be ignoring because of a need to establish desirable demographics. There has to be a middle ground.
The Rosslyn island disappeared because of the new middle school and adding some W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown, not because being a few miles from Williamsburg and Yorktown was such a BFD. The need to balance demographics is far more important than your dismissive comments suggest.
I see a little hypocrisy here.
No. It didn't. It disappeared because those families no longer wanted to be on a bus to Williamsburg for the sake of Williamsburg having some ED and diverse kids. And that's when the SB decided it had a "no more island" policy. This policy means that Williamsburg will have essentially no ED kids.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing about trying to bully someone into doing what you want. One element of bullying is that the bully has to have some kind of power over the person being bullied, such as physical strength, social influence, etc. SA has no power over NA, so you're not in a position to bully them into anything. If you want their help, you need to try a different tactic because all this one is doing is causing them to roll their eyes and tune you out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contiguity is important, as is making schools be close to people's homes. Look at the Rosslyn island for middle school highschool -- there's a reason it was removed for middle school this past go around. Those kids have a very hard time getting to and from school without school buses. This makes it so they can't do after school activities and parents can't be as engaged in the school. These are not things that as a community we should be ignoring because of a need to establish desirable demographics. There has to be a middle ground.
The Rosslyn island disappeared because of the new middle school and adding some W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown, not because being a few miles from Williamsburg and Yorktown was such a BFD. The need to balance demographics is far more important than your dismissive comments suggest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contiguity is important, as is making schools be close to people's homes. Look at the Rosslyn island for middle school highschool -- there's a reason it was removed for middle school this past go around. Those kids have a very hard time getting to and from school without school buses. This makes it so they can't do after school activities and parents can't be as engaged in the school. These are not things that as a community we should be ignoring because of a need to establish desirable demographics. There has to be a middle ground.
The Rosslyn island disappeared because of the new middle school and adding some W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown, not because being a few miles from Williamsburg and Yorktown was such a BFD. The need to balance demographics is far more important than your dismissive comments suggest.
I see a little hypocrisy here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Contiguity is important, as is making schools be close to people's homes. Look at the Rosslyn island for middle school highschool -- there's a reason it was removed for middle school this past go around. Those kids have a very hard time getting to and from school without school buses. This makes it so they can't do after school activities and parents can't be as engaged in the school. These are not things that as a community we should be ignoring because of a need to establish desirable demographics. There has to be a middle ground.
The Rosslyn island disappeared because of the new middle school and adding some W-L neighborhoods to Yorktown, not because being a few miles from Williamsburg and Yorktown was such a BFD. The need to balance demographics is far more important than your dismissive comments suggest.
Anonymous wrote:Contiguity is important, as is making schools be close to people's homes. Look at the Rosslyn island for middle school highschool -- there's a reason it was removed for middle school this past go around. Those kids have a very hard time getting to and from school without school buses. This makes it so they can't do after school activities and parents can't be as engaged in the school. These are not things that as a community we should be ignoring because of a need to establish desirable demographics. There has to be a middle ground.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just have to say how I love that this post started out about how to hold the Staff and School Board accountable and devolved into a post blaming NA parents for the woes of the SA boundary process. A process NA had zero to do with.
NA bashing is getting so old, and clearly isn't getting SA anywhere.
I wouldn't say NA had NOTHING to do with it. It's the attitudes and perceptions that drove people to NA to avoid the "problem" and thereby exacerbated the situation. And NA pushback against APAH-like projects in THEIR neighborhoods, exacerbating the saturation of low-income housing in SA neighborhoods.
Kind of reaching here but I admire the effort to still blame NA!
OK, then. What has NA done to HELP?
What were we supposed to do?
Don't fight "weird" boundaries.
Don't insist on "contiguity" and no "islands" and "alignment"
Advocate for 30% seat set-asides for ED in all choice programs.
Push the CB and APAH and their colleagues for family unit CAFs north of Ballston, not just senior and studio CAFs.
Hard core push for a lot of multi-family CAFs along Lee Highway.
Strongly support geographical distribution and speak out loudly against more CAFs along Columbia Pike, especially the West End - neighborhoods where the neighborhood school FRL rates are already 50% and above.
Lobby the CB on housing; but acknowledge there are things a school system can do to mitigate impacts of existing housing and support those things regardless of how many buses it requires: Cambridge models for admissions, for example.
Start pushing some candidates from north Arlington who will push these things both on SB and CB.
Stop going along with the SB line that all Arlington schools are great and start insisting that they be EQUALLY great - and that that requires economically diverse student bodies.
Insist that APS and the community provide those wraparound services and programs they have at Carlin Springs to justify segregation at ALL schools so ALL students in need of them can get them easily regardless of where they live.
Stop calling SA parents who do these things racist, NIMBY, or just stupid or for not knowing what they were buying into or naive that they thought they could make a difference.
Stop telling SA parents who do these things to "just move" or "choice out."
Drew will have a lot of empty space next year - get a slew of NA families to transfer their kids into Drew.
STOP the CB from pushing MORE affordable housing in the new "Opportunity Zones" that are probably meant more for economic development; but APAH et al already have their sights on.
STOP the CB from using the Amazon "agreement" to focus all the AH in Crystal City, Pentagon City, "AND COLUMBIA PIKE." Oakridge could sustain more; but FAMILY sized AH (your Arington Mills, Columbia Hills-es, and Gilliam Places) need to go NORTH - perfect opportunity to distribute AH in Arlington and start creating it on Lee Hwy.
And remember, the question was what North Arlington could do/should have done - not what some individuals in north arlington could do. NORTH ARLINGTON needs to be a voice for all these things.
This list sounds like it was written by someone who only started paying attention this fall and is repeating talking points they’ve heard without checking if they were factually accurate or logical.
You couldn't be more wrong. So I won't bother to ask what you allege to be "factually" inaccurate - because you will likely be quite wrong again.
Anonymous wrote:
Don't fight "weird" boundaries.
Don't insist on "contiguity" and no "islands" and "alignment"
Advocate for 30% seat set-asides for ED in all choice programs.
Push the CB and APAH and their colleagues for family unit CAFs north of Ballston, not just senior and studio CAFs.
Hard core push for a lot of multi-family CAFs along Lee Highway.
Strongly support geographical distribution and speak out loudly against more CAFs along Columbia Pike, especially the West End - neighborhoods where the neighborhood school FRL rates are already 50% and above.
Lobby the CB on housing; but acknowledge there are things a school system can do to mitigate impacts of existing housing and support those things regardless of how many buses it requires: Cambridge models for admissions, for example.
Start pushing some candidates from north Arlington who will push these things both on SB and CB.
Stop going along with the SB line that all Arlington schools are great and start insisting that they be EQUALLY great - and that that requires economically diverse student bodies.
Insist that APS and the community provide those wraparound services and programs they have at Carlin Springs to justify segregation at ALL schools so ALL students in need of them can get them easily regardless of where they live.
Stop calling SA parents who do these things racist, NIMBY, or just stupid or for not knowing what they were buying into or naive that they thought they could make a difference.
Stop telling SA parents who do these things to "just move" or "choice out."
Drew will have a lot of empty space next year - get a slew of NA families to transfer their kids into Drew.
STOP the CB from pushing MORE affordable housing in the new "Opportunity Zones" that are probably meant more for economic development; but APAH et al already have their sights on.
STOP the CB from using the Amazon "agreement" to focus all the AH in Crystal City, Pentagon City, "AND COLUMBIA PIKE." Oakridge could sustain more; but FAMILY sized AH (your Arington Mills, Columbia Hills-es, and Gilliam Places) need to go NORTH - perfect opportunity to distribute AH in Arlington and start creating it on Lee Hwy.
And remember, the question was what North Arlington could do/should have done - not what some individuals in north arlington could do. NORTH ARLINGTON needs to be a voice for all these things.