Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, the middle school magnet has very different student demographics in 7th grade vs 6th, at least for tpms.
I'm genuinely curious about this. Where did you get this info? Can you provide a link?
NP true per DC in Tpms
Sorry if I wasn't clear but I'm looking for actual data, not anonymous anecdotes
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, the middle school magnet has very different student demographics in 7th grade vs 6th, at least for tpms.
I'm genuinely curious about this. Where did you get this info? Can you provide a link?
NP true per DC in Tpms
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yep, the middle school magnet has very different student demographics in 7th grade vs 6th, at least for tpms.
I'm genuinely curious about this. Where did you get this info? Can you provide a link?
Anonymous wrote:---Friendly reminder that this thread is about CES, which is an elementary school program---
Anonymous wrote:It is funny about unintended consequences, the magnet was developed to get UMC mostly white kids to self opt into minority schools. After a few decades minority parents looked up and saw a bunch of white and Asian kids in there school with the best classes and all the other carrots that got those kids to opt in originally. Outrage ensues and the system reacts and starts to make the carrots “less targeted” and more open and those parents would never ever send there kids to schools like eastern, TP or Blair are now pissed that they are losing their private-lite education for their kids that they didn’t really need in the first place. They cry system biases as the real biases that favored them are eliminated, little tone deft.
The question is if the county will continue to disproportionately fund a program that spends lots but only helps a handful of kids but doesn’t boost the paper diversity and test score targets. Part of the draw of the old program wasn’t that it got the smart kids but it got the motivated families. It is yet to be seen if kids who qualify but don’t have pushy parents or the money to keep up will reach the heights of pervious classes. It will be interesting
Anonymous wrote:If there was even a shred of evidence that the county was trying to diversify the magnets as you say, there'd be a lawsuit. It's illegal. You people are crazypants.
Anonymous wrote:Put a different way, if you use the numbers above as very rough estimates given the lack of any real data, a "highly able" child in the CCES area would have a 25% chance of getting into a CES. A "highly able" child in the Barnsley area would have almost a 100% chance.
Sure but the adminstrators, tracking federal requirements or so they likely think, are trying to get both the CCES area kids AND the Barnsley kids the same % chance of having a peer group of highly ables.Anonymous wrote:Put a different way, if you use the numbers above as very rough estimates given the lack of any real data, a "highly able" child in the CCES area would have a 25% chance of getting into a CES. A "highly able" child in the Barnsley area would have almost a 100% chance.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't know if some people believe there was a demographic reason to move WJ out of Barnsley. We were told it was because when Silver Creek MS opened, CCES lost their 6th grade, so they had additional space. Because CCES had additional classroom space, it made sense to add WJ (and a third CES classroom) to CCES. I don't believe that the Barnsley CES was reduced in number of classrooms, so effectively it does mean more spaces for students from the clusters Barnsley still serves.