Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish I lived in a country where the work/life balance was better (shorter workweek, lots of holidays) and childcare (early and after-school) was more affordable. If I lived in one I would have kept working. Happily.
But for our family it makes more sense to be a trailing spouse, freeing DH to go after big promotions.
+ 1
I wish the people who asked these questions and made judgement about this stuff could recognize that we DON'T live in an ideal society and we all have to make do with less than ideal choices.
But why couldn’t your DH be the trailing spouse and you go after the big promotions? Why do women always have to short change themselves?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know...for a lot of women it's less about Not Wanting to Work and more about Not Wanting to Miss All That time with Their Kids While They're Small Because it goes by so Fast.
+1
Not really about "not working" for most women.
- a highly educated SAHM
Sure or you could not cut it in the work force...so you took te easy way out.
Yeah- I work full time after being home for years with three kids. I make nearly $300k now. My job is so much wasted time and corporate circle jerking it is SO much easier than being home for those years.
Your theory makes sense I guess- if it means that you choosing work meant that you couldn’t cut it as a mom, and all.
Haha. You must be a sahm!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wish I lived in a country where the work/life balance was better (shorter workweek, lots of holidays) and childcare (early and after-school) was more affordable. If I lived in one I would have kept working. Happily.
But for our family it makes more sense to be a trailing spouse, freeing DH to go after big promotions.
+ 1
I wish the people who asked these questions and made judgement about this stuff could recognize that we DON'T live in an ideal society and we all have to make do with less than ideal choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am a stay at home mom of school aged kids. I don’t work because I don’t have to and don’t want to. There are other reasons but that’s the most powerful one. I love not having a boss or restraints on my time or annoying paper work or go workers or entitled clients to deal with etc., etc. Most jobs are kind of a drag.
Let’s face it, how many people would continue working if they won the lotto? Not many. Most people would devote their time to hobbies, leisure, socializing, travel, volunteering etc.
I disagree with this theory. Plenty of people Work who may fall under the category of “don’t have to.” do you think Reese Witherspoon really needs the money? No.
You simply may have different financial goals than others who continued working. I feel that even with a high earning spouse and relatively wealthy Parents that I’d be doing myself a disservice not working and contributing to retirement and receiving subsidized healthcare.
The sad truth is that few SAHMs get to spend a lot of time traveling, socializing and leisure. Most are taking care of kids or spending their time on household duties. They are doing unpaid labor for men while their husbands get to go to work, earn money and have [b]indepdence.
Are you really comparing yourself to Reece Witherspoon?![]()
Clearly being a SAHM has made your brain mush and you can’t read. My point was that there are plenty of women who don’t have to work who work. For example, Reese Witherspoon.
How much time do you really think Reese Witherspoon spends working?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know...for a lot of women it's less about Not Wanting to Work and more about Not Wanting to Miss All That time with Their Kids While They're Small Because it goes by so Fast.
+1
Not really about "not working" for most women.
- a highly educated SAHM
Sure or you could not cut it in the work force...so you took te easy way out.
Yeah- I work full time after being home for years with three kids. I make nearly $300k now. My job is so much wasted time and corporate circle jerking it is SO much easier than being home for those years.
Your theory makes sense I guess- if it means that you choosing work meant that you couldn’t cut it as a mom, and all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know...for a lot of women it's less about Not Wanting to Work and more about Not Wanting to Miss All That time with Their Kids While They're Small Because it goes by so Fast.
+1
Not really about "not working" for most women.
- a highly educated SAHM
Sure or you could not cut it in the work force...so you took te easy way out.
Anonymous wrote:DH is a biglaw partner and I’m a biglaw associate. I don’t have to work. I love it but also I want my daughter to see being a mom and a professional is possible and even enjoyable.
Plus we are rich. That’s nice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know...for a lot of women it's less about Not Wanting to Work and more about Not Wanting to Miss All That time with Their Kids While They're Small Because it goes by so Fast.
+1
Not really about "not working" for most women.
- a highly educated SAHM
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:feminism sold us a bill of lies.
women had a great deal before all this liberation crap. feminism screwed it up.
now we're realizing we gave up a cushy existence to be office drones and push paper.
this is why we are jealous of women who get to SAHM.This is why we have the mommy wars.
We should be coming together to take down the patriarchy that created this! Not fighting amongst each other!