Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's finally time Barbara Trumpstock got Wexton'd herself. Bye Babbs!
I'm voting for Comstock just because of your stupid incessant bullying of "Bye Babbs" for the last year. If that's the best the liberals can do then I'm voting for an intelligent woman, which I know Comstock is.
I’ve heard of single-issue voters but you’re taking it to an extreme, no? Plus, by your logic, if you hung out on FFXU rather than DCUM, you’d be voting for Wexton.
Wouldn't know. Don't go there. But the bullying and name calling by the boilerroom liberals and the "bye bye Babs stuff" has turned me against any liberal candidate in the 10th, especially when they admit, as they have here, that they don't even live in the district. There's correct political argument, and then there is ridicule and hate. The libs have gone too far in this race with the "Bye bye Babs" stuff for the last year.
Your outrage is just a bit too transparent. The name calling originates with this orange turd of a President, behind whom Comstock and her fellow Republicans have repeatedly united. I will be happy to see her go.
Comstock split with Trump before the 2016 election over the video tape at great risk to her campaign. She is no Trumper. In fact, there are Trumpers set against her precisely for that reason. But don't let pesky facts get in the way of your screed. By all means lump everyone together if it fits your hate profile.
Comstock supports Trump’s agenda 98% of the time, according to third-party sources. I won’t support a 1%-er who is at best a 2%-er. Trump needs to be investigated and contained, not coddled.
You can't google. I get it. I realize that the Dems/Wexton etc are all out to slam Comstock no matter what and with whatever lies they can, but for the record, Comstock is not a Trumper. She broke support iin 2016 and urged him to drop out of the race. But I realize that you want your news from "third-party sources" (you're quote blue wave) so there's no point in arguing. You're going to believe whatever you are spoon-fed. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/republican-rep-barbara-comstock-of-virginia-urges-trump-to-drop-out-of-race/2016/10/07/79119406-8d06-11e6-bff0-d53f592f176e_story.html?utm_term=.6bbc23be4195
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's finally time Barbara Trumpstock got Wexton'd herself. Bye Babbs!
I'm voting for Comstock just because of your stupid incessant bullying of "Bye Babbs" for the last year. If that's the best the liberals can do then I'm voting for an intelligent woman, which I know Comstock is.
I’ve heard of single-issue voters but you’re taking it to an extreme, no? Plus, by your logic, if you hung out on FFXU rather than DCUM, you’d be voting for Wexton.
Wouldn't know. Don't go there. But the bullying and name calling by the boilerroom liberals and the "bye bye Babs stuff" has turned me against any liberal candidate in the 10th, especially when they admit, as they have here, that they don't even live in the district. There's correct political argument, and then there is ridicule and hate. The libs have gone too far in this race with the "Bye bye Babs" stuff for the last year.
Your outrage is just a bit too transparent. The name calling originates with this orange turd of a President, behind whom Comstock and her fellow Republicans have repeatedly united. I will be happy to see her go.
Comstock split with Trump before the 2016 election over the video tape at great risk to her campaign. She is no Trumper. In fact, there are Trumpers set against her precisely for that reason. But don't let pesky facts get in the way of your screed. By all means lump everyone together if it fits your hate profile.
Comstock supports Trump’s agenda 98% of the time, according to third-party sources. I won’t support a 1%-er who is at best a 2%-er. Trump needs to be investigated and contained, not coddled.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's finally time Barbara Trumpstock got Wexton'd herself. Bye Babbs!
I'm voting for Comstock just because of your stupid incessant bullying of "Bye Babbs" for the last year. If that's the best the liberals can do then I'm voting for an intelligent woman, which I know Comstock is.
I’ve heard of single-issue voters but you’re taking it to an extreme, no? Plus, by your logic, if you hung out on FFXU rather than DCUM, you’d be voting for Wexton.
Wouldn't know. Don't go there. But the bullying and name calling by the boilerroom liberals and the "bye bye Babs stuff" has turned me against any liberal candidate in the 10th, especially when they admit, as they have here, that they don't even live in the district. There's correct political argument, and then there is ridicule and hate. The libs have gone too far in this race with the "Bye bye Babs" stuff for the last year.
Your outrage is just a bit too transparent. The name calling originates with this orange turd of a President, behind whom Comstock and her fellow Republicans have repeatedly united. I will be happy to see her go.
Comstock split with Trump before the 2016 election over the video tape at great risk to her campaign. She is no Trumper. In fact, there are Trumpers set against her precisely for that reason. But don't let pesky facts get in the way of your screed. By all means lump everyone together if it fits your hate profile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's finally time Barbara Trumpstock got Wexton'd herself. Bye Babbs!
I'm voting for Comstock just because of your stupid incessant bullying of "Bye Babbs" for the last year. If that's the best the liberals can do then I'm voting for an intelligent woman, which I know Comstock is.
I’ve heard of single-issue voters but you’re taking it to an extreme, no? Plus, by your logic, if you hung out on FFXU rather than DCUM, you’d be voting for Wexton.
Wouldn't know. Don't go there. But the bullying and name calling by the boilerroom liberals and the "bye bye Babs stuff" has turned me against any liberal candidate in the 10th, especially when they admit, as they have here, that they don't even live in the district. There's correct political argument, and then there is ridicule and hate. The libs have gone too far in this race with the "Bye bye Babs" stuff for the last year.
Your outrage is just a bit too transparent. The name calling originates with this orange turd of a President, behind whom Comstock and her fellow Republicans have repeatedly united. I will be happy to see her go.
Anonymous wrote:Anybody but Taxton.
Already screwed on mortgage write offs .
Anonymous wrote:I would vote for anyone going against Comstock.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's finally time Barbara Trumpstock got Wexton'd herself. Bye Babbs!
I'm voting for Comstock just because of your stupid incessant bullying of "Bye Babbs" for the last year. If that's the best the liberals can do then I'm voting for an intelligent woman, which I know Comstock is.
I’ve heard of single-issue voters but you’re taking it to an extreme, no? Plus, by your logic, if you hung out on FFXU rather than DCUM, you’d be voting for Wexton.
Wouldn't know. Don't go there. But the bullying and name calling by the boilerroom liberals and the "bye bye Babs stuff" has turned me against any liberal candidate in the 10th, especially when they admit, as they have here, that they don't even live in the district. There's correct political argument, and then there is ridicule and hate. The libs have gone too far in this race with the "Bye bye Babs" stuff for the last year.