Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Making fun of Gillibrand’s voice is so laughable when you consider the dotard in chief.
Agree, and I agree with 99% of what she says, but I have to admit, her voice is a little hard to listen to.
I don’t hear it. She sounds like most of the suburban mom crowd to me. I think she’s relatable.
But I guess women aren’t allowed to be upbeat?
Gillibrand is an embarrassment. Fickle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Elizabeth warren is the Dems’ best bet. Anyone who thinks she’s unelectable should ask themself whether the current guy was electable
I love warren but I think she’s too far left and can turn off a lot of people.
Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone think Hillary can -- or would want to -- run again? I can't believe she is that delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Making fun of Gillibrand’s voice is so laughable when you consider the dotard in chief.
Agree, and I agree with 99% of what she says, but I have to admit, her voice is a little hard to listen to.
I don’t hear it. She sounds like most of the suburban mom crowd to me. I think she’s relatable.
But I guess women aren’t allowed to be upbeat?
Gillibrand is an embarrassment. Fickle.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Making fun of Gillibrand’s voice is so laughable when you consider the dotard in chief.
Agree, and I agree with 99% of what she says, but I have to admit, her voice is a little hard to listen to.
I don’t hear it. She sounds like most of the suburban mom crowd to me. I think she’s relatable.
But I guess women aren’t allowed to be upbeat?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Making fun of Gillibrand’s voice is so laughable when you consider the dotard in chief.
Agree, and I agree with 99% of what she says, but I have to admit, her voice is a little hard to listen to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think Elizabeth warren is the Dems’ best bet. Anyone who thinks she’s unelectable should ask themself whether the current guy was electable
I love warren but I think she’s too far left and can turn off a lot of people.
Anonymous wrote:I think Elizabeth warren is the Dems’ best bet. Anyone who thinks she’s unelectable should ask themself whether the current guy was electable
Anonymous wrote:Making fun of Gillibrand’s voice is so laughable when you consider the dotard in chief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of them can beat Trump. Trump is historically unpopular. Unless he pulls some miracle turn-around, he is going to get his clock cleaned.
Anyone who doesn't admit that is blinded by partisanship or a fool, or both.
I'm very liberal, and I think this is completely wrong. I think Trump will win in 2020, no problem, and am prepared to knock on doors for months in 2018 and 2020 in opposition to him and all the Republican cowards who are supporting him. GOTV is the only way we can defeat him and his horrific policies.
Agree with other posters who say Democrats need a man to run in 2020. Just look at how Trump is destroying Merkel and May. He's a sadistic creep who is especially adept at targeting women politicians.
Yup, agree with everything you said.
Especially woman politicians who allow their countries to be overrun by every immigrant that can make it to the gates. I think he let a few men have it along the way too. Look at their policies to see why Trump is on them, not their gender.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would not surprise me if Hillary ran again ....... and if that happens, you can pretty much be assured of Trump being in office until 2024.
What is it about some liberals who just can't get it into their thick heads that what we need is not just someone who has the background to be president but he/she has to be ELECTABLE.
She is undoubtedly positioning herself for another run in 2020.
Are you a republican or a democrat? I think you are an R. What are you all going to do when the Clintons are dead? Where will all this energy go?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If Ds are even thinking about pushing Hillary to run again, they are even more clueless than usual (and I enthusiastically voted for her last go around).
I like John Delaney. He has already announced he is running in '20 and his more moderate bi-partisan cooperation message should be appealing to the large numbers of non-crazy Rs and non-uber-liberal Ds. He's not the most inspiring public speaker but there is time for him to work on that and his message and background (successful business person) are broadly appealing and seem good for our country.
I am a D. I will evaluate each democrats running in primary carefully for their policy and records and chose the best one. I would also vote for Hillary enthusiastically again if she gets past primary. There is nothing wrong with her (and in fact she is amply fit) unless you have bought into all the nonsense that is pushed by right-wing media amplified by Russian/other enemy trolls.
But I do not think she is inclined to run again.
^^^ Case in point. This is a liberal.
It's a great idea. Don't try to squelch it.
They're saying they would vote for her if she got past the primary. I would too. That's not the same thing as saying she should run or would make it that far. I would vote for almost anyone over trump
I am the PP whose post was bolded above.
I do not see any sign of Hillary running for presidency again. However, if she does and she is picked by Democrats as the candidate I would be very happy to vote for her. She is an extremely qualified candidate. She might be hated by many , but a lot of the hate is mongered by right wing propaganda and general conditioning of people to distrust powerful women. She is not perfect, yet she is a lot better than a whole lot of politicians we have seen in American politics. The only aspects where I am concerned is her age. That's the reason I do not think she would run.