Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
So, you go and your husband stays. Why is him attending your sister's wedding more important than taking care of your child?
This is actually a good point. It makes more sense for her husband to stay home. Many people would decline an invitation like that entirely (even from a sibling) when they have a young child. It's totally reasonable for only one of you to go - good compromise.
For the record, I am on OPs side, but PP what the heck? Many people would decline their sister's wedding when they have a young child???? A 1 day old, maybe. Someone said it earlier but it's not the baby Jesus!
I know! You can always have another one! Amirite?
Nor is this bride Kate Middleton.
Not everyone with amone year old is CJ mfortable lesving the child for a week, and that's ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
So, you go and your husband stays. Why is him attending your sister's wedding more important than taking care of your child?
This is actually a good point. It makes more sense for her husband to stay home. Many people would decline an invitation like that entirely (even from a sibling) when they have a young child. It's totally reasonable for only one of you to go - good compromise.
Not to mention many many 13 month olds are still nursing several times a day. All of mine were. I could not have left them for more than a 1/2 day at that age.
For the record, I am on OPs side, but PP what the heck? Many people would decline their sister's wedding when they have a young child???? A 1 day old, maybe. Someone said it earlier but it's not the baby Jesus!
I know! You can always have another one! Amirite?
Nor is this bride Kate Middleton.
Not everyone with amone year old is CJ mfortable lesving the child for a week, and that's ok.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
So, you go and your husband stays. Why is him attending your sister's wedding more important than taking care of your child?
This is actually a good point. It makes more sense for her husband to stay home. Many people would decline an invitation like that entirely (even from a sibling) when they have a young child. It's totally reasonable for only one of you to go - good compromise.
For the record, I am on OPs side, but PP what the heck? Many people would decline their sister's wedding when they have a young child???? A 1 day old, maybe. Someone said it earlier but it's not the baby Jesus!
I know! You can always have another one! Amirite?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it’s reasonable for you not to want them looking after her and taking her out of state. But tbh I wouldn’t have planned a trip wo my kid in these circumstances.
This
I don't think you sound anxious.
I would never have planned a trip like this. Is it a wedding?
Yes. It is my sisters wedding in Europe. I do not want to go. But I feel like I need to.
So, you go and your husband stays. Why is him attending your sister's wedding more important than taking care of your child?
This is actually a good point. It makes more sense for her husband to stay home. Many people would decline an invitation like that entirely (even from a sibling) when they have a young child. It's totally reasonable for only one of you to go - good compromise.
For the record, I am on OPs side, but PP what the heck? Many people would decline their sister's wedding when they have a young child???? A 1 day old, maybe. Someone said it earlier but it's not the baby Jesus!
Anonymous wrote:
I skipped my brother's wedding when I had a 1 year old. It was expensive, and he was participating in stupid family drama that always surrounds our family weddings. I just noped out. No regrets.