Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When we will you guys learn that trump supporters don’t care? They support trump no matter what.
When will you guys learn that after you keep claiming to have found a "smoking gun" which fizzles out, it is difficult to take the latest revelation seriously or a game changer. If one gave credence to all of your past claims, Trump would have been impeached and removed from office last summer. Remember all the crap about Trump being in a state of dementia and needing to be removed using the 25th Amendment and how about those multiple psychologists who signed a letter saying that Trump was mentally unbalanced?
When wishful thinking takes over from realistic and objective assessment of the facts, it makes it difficult to take some of these conclusions seriously.
I am not a Trump supporter but about the only thing about this latest revelation is that Trump probably lied when he said he did not know about Cohen paying Daniels .......... but Trump lies constantly and it has not affected his support among Republicans - which is all that matters.
It does matter for Mueller and the states who can bring charges. Trump's followers are hopeless, but have faith in Mueller.
Anonymous wrote:The hysteria from liberals is just out of control .........
So Trump paid to keep an affair quiet and he lied about having an affair. What else is new?
Anonymous wrote:The hysteria from liberals is just out of control .........
So Trump paid to keep an affair quiet and he lied about having an affair. What else is new?
HANNITY: Yes. There is a political report today basically suggesting Mueller would now consider Ivanka Trump a target. Look at Hope Hicks as one example.
GIULIANI: Come on.
HANNITY: She paid more in lawyers than she was ever paid.
GIULIANI: Hope is, I wish the American people could get to know her. Hope is one of the nicest human beings you're ever going to meet. Yes, she is very loyal to Donald Trump. But I think the president would say this, she could stand up to him when she had to. What they did to her is outrageous. Absolutely outrageous.
Ivanka Trump? I would -- I think I would get on my charger and go right into the writer's room with a lance if go after Ivanka.
HANNITY: At this point, sir, I honestly agree with you I fear for the country. Let me go to--
(CROSSTALK)
GIULIANI: Now if they do to Ivanka, which I doubt they will, the whole country will turn on them. They are going after his daughter?
HANNITY: What about his son-in-law, they talked about him.
GIULIANI: I guess Jared is a fine man, you know that. But men are, you know, disposable. But a fine woman like Ivanka? Come on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, to be a fly on the wall of the WH right now.
+1 My great grandchildren will probably find the story of this era in history to be an interesting read. Unfortunate that we have to live through this chaos and stupidity.
Anonymous wrote:Oh, to be a fly on the wall of the WH right now.
Anonymous wrote:The hysteria from liberals is just out of control .........
So Trump paid to keep an affair quiet and he lied about having an affair. What else is new?
Anonymous wrote:The hysteria from liberals is just out of control .........
So Trump paid to keep an affair quiet and he lied about having an affair. What else is new?
Anonymous wrote:This totally sounds like Hannity was setting Giuliani up to admit money laundering (by planting the word "funneling"). What does Hannity have against Guiliani?
The payment is going to turn out to be "perfectly legal," Giuliani told Hannity.
"That money was not campaign money, sorry," Giuliani said. "I'm giving you a fact now that you don't know. It's not campaign money. No campaign finance violation."
Hannity replied: "Because they funneled it through the law firm?"
To which Giuliani said: "Funneled it through the law firm, and the President repaid him."
https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/02/politics/giuliani-hannity-comey/index.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:4 pages and no one's defending Trump? What time is it in Russia?
Oh I think the poster on the last page who called this a "nothingburger" was a feeble attempt to defend 45. Just not very articulate.
Structuring payments to be under $10k is a money laundering violation. It's business as usual for Trump.
+1 look at how many times Trump was indicted for this kind of stuff. It's pretty lengthy:
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/donald-trump-scandals/474726/