Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

^^^would refuse to give up his gun even if it meant saving the life of a child.

I'd refuse to give up my ability to protect my kids because someone had a theory that making me and my family defenseless would stop crazies from killing people.

Delusional.

Average citizens wielding guns has never protected or stopped anything in America. You may have your handful of anecdotes or the random YouTube video of something like a shopkeeper shooting wildly while some thugs run away but in aggregate it is all for nothing. America actually has *more* violent crime per capita than modern industrialized nations that have gun control.

Anonymous wrote:Why would an AR 15 not be legal? Because they scare liberals? That doesn’t seem like a very good reason to make something illegal. Whether it be guns, free speech, or anything else for that matter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

^^^would refuse to give up his gun even if it meant saving the life of a child.

I'd refuse to give up my ability to protect my kids because someone had a theory that making me and my family defenseless would stop crazies from killing people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter wasn't on mind-altering drugs?

Serious question. Since they all fit that pattern, but it's the one thing we can't talk about because the left doesn't want to offend crazies, and the networks don't want to offend their advertisers. But people used to bring their rifles to school to hunt before they got home, and nobody was shooting the place up then. Now that every kid is on some drug (which isn't even tested on kids btw!!) there are loads of school shootings and every one of the shooters is either on those drugs or coming off of them. Including Cruz, according to his aunt.

Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter didn't have a gun?

Serious question. They all fit a pattern.

No? Yeah, me neither.

Yeah, but kids with guns existed for ages. It's only recently that this became a real problem. But some people would rather dance in the blood of dead kids to push their (unrealistic I might add) agenda, than to actually figure out the problem, and a solution.

Ban guns. Oh, that'll solve it. Like the complete and total ban on heroin solved the heroin epidemic, or how the complete and total ban on murder solved school shootings. But no, instead of finding the cause, let's dance in blood to push something we already wanted anyway even though there's zero evidence it'll work (wasn't DC a gun-free zone?).

Yeah, some non-partisan institution should investigate gun violence. OH WAIT, THERE IS A LAW AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING THAT THANKS TO NRA LOBBYING.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/04/gun-violence-research-has-been-shut-down-for-20-years/?utm_term=.34b35e2b3647

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter wasn't on mind-altering drugs?

Serious question. Since they all fit that pattern, but it's the one thing we can't talk about because the left doesn't want to offend crazies, and the networks don't want to offend their advertisers. But people used to bring their rifles to school to hunt before they got home, and nobody was shooting the place up then. Now that every kid is on some drug (which isn't even tested on kids btw!!) there are loads of school shootings and every one of the shooters is either on those drugs or coming off of them. Including Cruz, according to his aunt.

Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter didn't have a gun?

Serious question. They all fit a pattern.

No? Yeah, me neither.

Yeah, but kids with guns existed for ages. It's only recently that this became a real problem. But some people would rather dance in the blood of dead kids to push their (unrealistic I might add) agenda, than to actually figure out the problem, and a solution.

Ban guns. Oh, that'll solve it. Like the complete and total ban on heroin solved the heroin epidemic, or how the complete and total ban on murder solved school shootings. But no, instead of finding the cause, let's dance in blood to push something we already wanted anyway even though there's zero evidence it'll work (wasn't DC a gun-free zone?).

Yeah, some non-partisan institution should investigate gun violence. OH WAIT, THERE IS A LAW AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT FUNDING THAT THANKS TO NRA LOBBYING.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/04/gun-violence-research-has-been-shut-down-for-20-years/?utm_term=.34b35e2b3647

Anonymous wrote:Why would an AR 15 not be legal? Because they scare liberals? That doesn’t seem like a very good reason to make something illegal. Whether it be guns, free speech, or anything else for that matter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

Not today - ok yeah, you are right.
Not ever - I believe you are wrong. And that’s why I donate and continue to support gun control candidates.

How’s that working out for you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

Not today - ok yeah, you are right.
Not ever - I believe you are wrong. And that’s why I donate and continue to support gun control candidates.

How’s that working out for you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter wasn't on mind-altering drugs?

Serious question. Since they all fit that pattern, but it's the one thing we can't talk about because the left doesn't want to offend crazies, and the networks don't want to offend their advertisers. But people used to bring their rifles to school to hunt before they got home, and nobody was shooting the place up then. Now that every kid is on some drug (which isn't even tested on kids btw!!) there are loads of school shootings and every one of the shooters is either on those drugs or coming off of them. Including Cruz, according to his aunt.

Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter didn't have a gun?

Serious question. They all fit a pattern.

No? Yeah, me neither.

Yeah, but kids with guns existed for ages. It's only recently that this became a real problem. But some people would rather dance in the blood of dead kids to push their (unrealistic I might add) agenda, than to actually figure out the problem, and a solution.

Ban guns. Oh, that'll solve it. Like the complete and total ban on heroin solved the heroin epidemic, or how the complete and total ban on murder solved school shootings. But no, instead of finding the cause, let's dance in blood to push something we already wanted anyway even though there's zero evidence it'll work (wasn't DC a gun-free zone?).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

^^^would refuse to give up his gun even if it meant saving the life of a child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

Not today - ok yeah, you are right.
Not ever - I believe you are wrong. And that’s why I donate and continue to support gun control candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.

^^^would refuse to give up his gun even if it meant saving the life of a child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter wasn't on mind-altering drugs?

Serious question. Since they all fit that pattern, but it's the one thing we can't talk about because the left doesn't want to offend crazies, and the networks don't want to offend their advertisers. But people used to bring their rifles to school to hunt before they got home, and nobody was shooting the place up then. Now that every kid is on some drug (which isn't even tested on kids btw!!) there are loads of school shootings and every one of the shooters is either on those drugs or coming off of them. Including Cruz, according to his aunt.

Anyone know the last school shooting where the shooter didn't have a gun?

Serious question. They all fit a pattern.

No? Yeah, me neither.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the most popular rifle in America and has been for years. It’s incredibly modular and customizable, has low recoil, handles lots of calibers (for hunting, home defense, competition shooting), is much easier to use than something like a shotgun (so good for disabled persons, such as a veteran I know who uses one to protect his home). But you’ve decided that they’re evil, or “machine guns,” or only used by “sucky hunters,” and have no legitimate purpose. So I’m not going to say anything else, because you have your opinion about them. So do the millions of normal Americans who own them.

Ps: they’re not going anywhere, so focus on something else.

Hey what school are you going to shoot up?

A mentally ill person kills a bunch of students and your response is take away guns? Try again. You won’t be restricting my rights because of some wacko. Not today. Not ever.