Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I don’t understand the appeal of yappy, aggressive, rat/like chihuahuas. Same reasoning. Could be any number of things. Protection. You find them cute. You like their blocky heads and their doggie smile. You prefer a larger size dog.
(And no, I don’t have a pit bull.)
No, it isn't. Because I've never heard of a "rat/like chihuahuas" tearing off a baby's face. You assert that "yappy" small non-pit breeds are "aggressive"? The stats about dog breeds and their rate of documented attacks says otherwise.
It’s been awhile since I posted and the thread has exploded but I just wanted to post this:
http://www.thedogplace.org/Family-Dog/0901-Most-Aggressive-Dogs.asp
They may not be able to inflict the damage a large dog can, but make no mistake about the most aggressive little a**hole dog breeds.
Is this the website that has a non scientific, self reported online "survey" that you can fill out as many times as you want as the basis for its "statistics"?
Besides, toy dog nips that barely break the skin and require little medical care beyond a bandaid and anibiotic ointment are in a totally different category from aggressive, damaging bites, maulings or dismemberments that require trauma care, years of reconstructive surgery or spending life unable to smile because the dog severed a main facial nerve when he ate your ear (what happened to the little boy who was attacked by the neighbors pitbull who got lose and jumped into their minivan when mom was unstrapping him and his sister from their car seats after a trip to the grocery store).
The argument of you and quack sites like this is like saying that because domestic cats scratch more frequently than tigers or even bobcats, that tabbies are a more aggressive animal. It is a stupid argumemt (chihuhuas are much more dangerous than pits

) made by stupid, dangerous people.