Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
They are enrolled at a higher proportion in Thomson.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
Anonymous wrote:Native Chinese speakers want to get rid of AA ED, tracking to segregate AA students away from Chinese-American students, and preferential admissions and free aftercare for Chinese-American students. Poster who revealed that Chinese view YY as a school for black children reveal racism that YY bashers should unpack and deal with rather than lash out on DCUM. As a taxpayer, I would rather not fund a variety of PCS and DCPS iniatiatives, including PK4 in wealthy neighborhoods whose parents can afford childcare (like some of PP). YY parents are generally happy and the PCSB evaluates Mandarin with Mandarin auditor. There are no AP, IB scores available yet - so perhaps we should check our privledge for a few years and see what the data tells us. Heritage speakers routinely bash MoCo programs, even though when you look at the upper high school levels it's all native speakers due to backfilling. However, public schools are supposed to reflect the demographics of the school populous not function as de facto private schools for a minority of students.
Anonymous wrote:The better comparator than Mundo Verde or LAMB would be Tyler on the Hill with few Spanish speakers at entry.
Anonymous wrote:Public language immersion programs are set up in different ways in different US cities. DC doesn't seem to try attract or accommodate native speakers to programs that don't teach Spanish.
One of my cousins sends his children to a public immersion program in Northern Cal with three different admissions lotteries: one for kids who don't speak Chinese at home, one for kids who speak any Chinese dialect but Mandarin at home, and one kids from Mandarin dominant homes. Each lottery provides one-third of the students. Another cousins sends her children to the D'Avila School in San Fran where all students are put in 50% immersion Cantonese through 5th grade. Cantonese is used to attract native speakers, around 3/4 of whom are Cantonese or Toisanese (sub-dialect of Cantonese) speakers in the Bay Area, to promote high standards for speaking. The D'Avila students transition from Cantonese to Mandarin in MS, with most going on to knock it out of the park on standardized HS Chinese exams.
Anonymous wrote:DC resident and parent who taught in an international school in Singapore before coming here.
I really wish that DC public schools would get serious about language immersion for languages other than Spanish or throw in the towel.
YuYing, the Chinese immersion program without a Chinese-speaking head or kids. Good Lord, what a joke. You can say it in one post, or 14 pages worth, one thread or many.
Anonymous wrote:Hi from Hong Kong where our kids attend an American-curriculum international school with daily Mandarin (despite Hong Kong being a predominantly Cantonese speaking city). Thought I’d mention some of our experiences as they may be relevant.
Kids have daily Chinese lessons at our school and are divided into two sections: “Mandarin near native (MNN)” speakers and "Mandarin as a second language(MSL)“. Mandarin is required from K-4 through Grade 5, and after that becomes an elective class. As the kids get into high school they are streamed into different sections of MNN or MSL or 1-2-3-4-5 (and higher for the MNN). MNN kids are predominantly two-parent Mandarin or Cantonese speaking households or one-parent Mandarin speaking (with outside tutors) and MSL are two-parent English speakers.
The “average” kids in the Native Speaker stream (MNN 3) are considered ready for AP Mandarin tests as early as their freshman year in high school, though they usually take the test much later. The MSL kids in the top two streams also have a very high pass rate for the AP Mandarin test, though they usually don’t get to that level of proficiency until their Junior or Senior years. I don’t know if AP Mandarin would be considered ‘fluency’ but it’s a baseline that might compare with Yu Ying once they get to that level.
Anecdotally, there was a family who was in Hong Kong for four years and they just moved to the American School in Paris. I asked them the other day how the switch was going from Mandarin to French and they said “we’ve learned more French in one year than we did with four years of Mandarin”. I asked if why and they said “With French they can just ‘sound it out’ if they don’t quite get it, and many of the words are similar enough to English spellings that they can get the gist. With Mandarin it is binary—right or wrong—you get it or you are just staring at the page clueless.