Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
I think moms of just boys sense this condescending pity coming from other moms of both or just girls and wear the moniker with pride to try to fight back.
#oneofeachmom with a #boymom sister in law
Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
I think moms of just boys sense this condescending pity coming from other moms of both or just girls and wear the moniker with pride to try to fight back.
#oneofeachmom with a #boymom sister in law
Wow, looking for any reason to hate your SIL. #womensuck

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
I think moms of just boys sense this condescending pity coming from other moms of both or just girls and wear the moniker with pride to try to fight back.
#oneofeachmom with a #boymom sister in law
Anonymous wrote:I truly believe that #boymom is a defense mechanism propagated by mothers of only boys who deep in their heart of hearts wish (or wished) they had a girl. #oneofeachmom
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is such a dumb thread. First is SAHMs vs. WOHMs, but now we've devolved to boy moms vs girl moms?? You're better than this DCUM.
No, DCUM isn't better than this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have a boy who is older, and who plays with a lot of girls, and yes - there are (generalized) differences! Things like risk taking, style of play, physicality, noise, when certain types of maturity occur, etc... It's real. It's not all kids, but it's a generalization that bears weight in lots of cases. So I guess I am a #boymom.
Would I ever write that hashtag on Facebook or something? No way. That seems icky. Like showing a photo of my new concealer and saying #onlyforladiez - I mean sure, mostly for ladies, but that's not the entire truth!
When I've noted differences aloud to closer friends or neighbors, I usually say "I hate to generalize" or "This probably is just my experience" and 9 out of 10 times the other person say "Oh. No. I see it. It's real." They just don't hashtag it!
Nope. It's socialization.
No it is not. My son almost exclusively plays with cars and trucks and trains. He has 4 girl cousins and when we go to their houses he will dig through the toy bins, past the dolls and Frozen gear, until he finds a car.
We have baby dolls and he never plays with it. But when his cousins come over they do play it.
Why is that anecdote evidence of anything? Couldn't that be socialized behavior?
Meaning what? He's a boy and he has a natural interest in cars and trucks. My nieces do not.
What's a natural interest? Nothing you said points to the idea that's it's innate rather than learned.
It is absolutely innate. I didn't teach my son what to play with. I didnt buy him only cars and trucks. I didn't teach him to crash his cars.
Anonymous wrote:This is such a bizarre post. I have one of each and I do believe there are innate differences just as their are socialized differences.
I can say that my boy - who is an average typical boy - has never done some of the thing posted on here (blood, broken things in the house, run around restaurants)! But then again neither has my girl. So maybe that is just good parenting...