Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kansas vs. Detroit
I'll take Kansas thanks
You are comparing a whole state to a city? Do you know WHY Detroit went bankrupt? It's government was TOO large and pensions were too fat. A problem that a lot of cities are facing. While in Kansas, people cannot even get basic services because they failed to realize that they needed more government than they thought.
Also, I do not know if you have been to Detroit lately, but there is a huge amount of development AND gentrification. The bankruptcy was a reset button. So right now, I would take Detroit and it would not even be close.
Anonymous wrote:Kansas vs. Detroit
I'll take Kansas thanks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good pick, endorsed by Ms Rice who voted for Obama and wasn't an ardent Trump supporter. I like Condelezza Rice and which she'd get it
Also endorsed by Bob Gates and Jim Baker.
These are all serious foreign policy professionals.
Dick Cheney endorsed him, too - why'd you leave him off the list?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good pick, endorsed by Ms Rice who voted for Obama and wasn't an ardent Trump supporter. I like Condelezza Rice and which she'd get it
Also endorsed by Bob Gates and Jim Baker.
These are all serious foreign policy professionals.
Anonymous wrote:Good, interesting choice from what I have seen so far. Much more overall international experience that Hillary Clinton or John Kerry, with management and negotiation skills to boot. (And please, save the typing about Senate Foreign Relations.) Should be a nice little shake-up down at Foggy Bottom.
Looking forward to the confirmation hearings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:306 Electoral votes and losing the popular vote by almost 3 million is nothing close to a landslide.
The presidency, control of the senate, control of the House, 33 Republican governors and the same number of state legislatures.
Call it what you want ........
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Well if he was ever accused of it, DCUM can jump right to the conclusion that he did it, and do their part to perpetuate fake news.
You mean like Bill Clinton was accused and you jumped right on that too?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:306 Electoral votes and losing the popular vote by almost 3 million is nothing close to a landslide.
The presidency, control of the senate, control of the House, 33 Republican governors and the same number of state legislatures.
Call it what you want ........
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:306 Electoral votes and losing the popular vote by almost 3 million is nothing close to a landslide.
The presidency, control of the senate, control of the House, 33 Republican governors and the same number of state legislatures.
Call it what you want ........
Anonymous wrote:With Rice, Gates and Baker testifying in support of the nomination, it will sail through.
Quite apart from the fact that there are Democratic senators up for reelection in 2018 who are vulnerable and will support this and other nominations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With Rice, Gates and Baker testifying in support of the nomination, it will sail through.
Quite apart from the fact that there are Democratic senators up for reelection in 2018 who are vulnerable and will support this and other nominations.
Not enough to change the basic fact that this guy is in bed with Russia, and we are in frequent conflict with Russia.
He will be cast out on those grounds.
Anonymous wrote:With Rice, Gates and Baker testifying in support of the nomination, it will sail through.
Quite apart from the fact that there are Democratic senators up for reelection in 2018 who are vulnerable and will support this and other nominations.