Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you put a bowl of candy out for people to take and people took it WHY IS THIS AN ISSUE? The candy was taken. Why does it matter if two kids took it or 20 kids took it? You people are insane.
Because it's unfair that some kids get all the candy and others get none, just because some kids are greedy.
Anonymous wrote:If you put a bowl of candy out for people to take and people took it WHY IS THIS AN ISSUE? The candy was taken. Why does it matter if two kids took it or 20 kids took it? You people are insane.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Horrible that someone actually posted a video of the kids.
How exactly was this horrible? Life has consequences. Don't act like an a-hole if you don't want people to know you're an a-hole - you never know when a camera is recording.
Because they are minors and not adults and their identies should be shielded to protect their privacy. They took candy and did not commit a robbery, even if they had because they are minors, law enforcement would not have disclosed their identities or images.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If a kid had come up on the porch and picked up their pumpkin and smashed it - and the kid was caught on video camera doing it - would it be o.k. to post a video on the neighborhood listserv where the parent might see it and discipline their kid.
Or would it be better for the homeowner to call the cops and let them deal with the perp?
It would be better to let some things go from time to time. Not everything is evidence of the decline of morality and ethics. Sometimes kids do dumb and/or destructive things. That doesn't make it right, but it is part of growing up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Horrible that someone actually posted a video of the kids.
How exactly was this horrible? Life has consequences. Don't act like an a-hole if you don't want people to know you're an a-hole - you never know when a camera is recording.
Because they are minors and not adults and their identies should be shielded to protect their privacy. They took candy and did not commit a robbery, even if they had because they are minors, law enforcement would not have disclosed their identities or images.