dAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On this site
http://uvaapplication.blogspot.com/2016/03/unofficial-admission-statistics-for.html
it says
92.8% of admitted students were in the top 10% of their high school class
This number only reflects those who attend schools that report rank.
So I'm not fooling myself as the know it all PP claimed? Excellent!
Every year my DC's nova high school. which does not rank its students, gives rising seniors a list of colleges that the past 5 years worth of students applied to, the percentage accepted, the average SAT or ACT score of accepted students and the average GPA of accepted students. The average GPA for students accepted by UVA was a 4.32.
A 4.32 at this high school pretty much means the student took a couple AP classes freshman and sophomore years and is taking almost all AP and/or IB classes junior and senior years and is earning As in them.
You are fooling yourself if you think 4.32 is not top 10% even if the school doesn't rank. Sure, that leaves room for a student with a lower GPA but not much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
And from a "better" school maybe you can sneak in from the top 11%.
Speaking as someone whose Dc is in the 11% -- they rank that as in the top 20%. Big jump downwards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The point is that the college says they aren't including schools that don't report rank in their number.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fairfax doesn't report rank to the colleges. The numbers can only include those who had a rank reported.
Its not too hard to figure it out when you go to the school and have its naviance.
That's just about irrelevant. Generally, UVA is not going to admit nova kids who are not in the top 10% regardless of whether the school system ranks in light of the fact UVA admissions can pretty well figure it out on its own.
Anonymous wrote:The point is that the college says they aren't including schools that don't report rank in their number.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fairfax doesn't report rank to the colleges. The numbers can only include those who had a rank reported.
Its not too hard to figure it out when you go to the school and have its naviance.
The point is that the college says they aren't including schools that don't report rank in their number.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fairfax doesn't report rank to the colleges. The numbers can only include those who had a rank reported.
Its not too hard to figure it out when you go to the school and have its naviance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
And from a "better" school maybe you can sneak in from the top 11%.
Anonymous wrote:Fairfax doesn't report rank to the colleges. The numbers can only include those who had a rank reported.
The exact opposite is true. Far more difficult of out of state.Anonymous wrote:this is key. Out of state pays higher rates, fills the coffers. More competitive in-state.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
And from a "better" school maybe you can sneak in from the top 11%.
My kids just went through the process in the last couple of years (not from VA), and I can tell you that the kids that went to UVA from their school were not in the top 10%, in some cases not even top 25%. There is a huge level of variation across schools and experiences out there ....
Anonymous wrote:Why would someone want to go to UVA again?
this is key. Out of state pays higher rates, fills the coffers. More competitive in-state.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
And from a "better" school maybe you can sneak in from the top 11%.
My kids just went through the process in the last couple of years (not from VA), and I can tell you that the kids that went to UVA from their school were not in the top 10%, in some cases not even top 25%. There is a huge level of variation across schools and experiences out there ....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
And from a "better" school maybe you can sneak in from the top 11%.
Anonymous wrote:UVA can't literally figure it out, and they cannot report it as a fact if they are using self-serving estimates. They can only report that data for students from schools that rank.
If you think about it, high-achieving high schools that send many students to top colleges have no incentive to rank students, whereas schools that place fewer students at top colleges can use the ranking system to focus attention more sharply on their best students. So what the 93% statistic is probably telling you is that if you are coming from a weaker school you have to be in the top 10%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On this site
http://uvaapplication.blogspot.com/2016/03/unofficial-admission-statistics-for.html
it says
92.8% of admitted students were in the top 10% of their high school class
This number only reflects those who attend schools that report rank.
So I'm not fooling myself as the know it all PP claimed? Excellent!