Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have an early September baby and the cutoff is Sept. 30. He's not even near kindergarten, but I'm redshirting 100%. I can afford childcare and there's no reason for my child to be the smallest in their class. Plus, an extra year of childhood. If you want to start your 4-year-old in kindergarten I don't care, but many of us make a different choice.
I never understand this. Your son will turn 18 years after he was born, regardless of when he starts kindergarten. Or does childhood end when the child (or the no-longer-child, I guess?) enters kindergarten?
Anonymous wrote:I have an early September baby and the cutoff is Sept. 30. He's not even near kindergarten, but I'm redshirting 100%. I can afford childcare and there's no reason for my child to be the smallest in their class. Plus, an extra year of childhood. If you want to start your 4-year-old in kindergarten I don't care, but many of us make a different choice.
Anonymous wrote:You have to understand that you are setting your poor son up to go through puberty a full year and a half ahead of his "peers".
I thin what you have done to your son is truly ridiculous and without merit or reason.
Anonymous wrote:It's your choice to pursue and adhd diagnosis. As well as medicating is a choice too. Redshirting is not the solution, parenting is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can't the school's just stop this and say there is a cutoff. Your child will enter with the correct class uses there is a special need? Am I missing something?
If your kid has a special need, even more reason to send them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how it typically plays out IMO:
Red shirted child does really well in school. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well, of course he is in the highest reading group. His mom had 10-12 more months to prep him"
Red shirted child does well in sports. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well of course he's better than all the other kids. He's had almost another year of growing, coordinating and his dad had another 10-12 months of throwing the ball with him every night in the backyard."
It's almost like these kids accomplishments are put in another category and excused because they are so much older they are expected to be better. And yes, everyone knows who these kids are
LOLOL.
So the lesson is: if you're choosing your child's academic path in order to impress other parents, don't redshirt. Got it.
OP, this is what youl'll have to deal with: the rampant insecurity of parents who didn't redshirt and who are therefore furious and terrified that your child may have some kind of advantage over their snowflakes.
My son just finished first grade (April birthday/not held back)--unlike the redshirted kids in his grade, he's in the highest reading and math groups and very atheletic. The three redshirted kids he knows are all massive violent troublemakers. So, no, not insecure...if anything, I feel bad for the kids who obviously haven't worked through the issues that caused them to be held back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how it typically plays out IMO:
Red shirted child does really well in school. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well, of course he is in the highest reading group. His mom had 10-12 more months to prep him"
Red shirted child does well in sports. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well of course he's better than all the other kids. He's had almost another year of growing, coordinating and his dad had another 10-12 months of throwing the ball with him every night in the backyard."
It's almost like these kids accomplishments are put in another category and excused because they are so much older they are expected to be better. And yes, everyone knows who these kids are
LOLOL.
So the lesson is: if you're choosing your child's academic path in order to impress other parents, don't redshirt. Got it.
OP, this is what youl'll have to deal with: the rampant insecurity of parents who didn't redshirt and who are therefore furious and terrified that your child may have some kind of advantage over their snowflakes.
My son just finished first grade (April birthday/not held back)--unlike the redshirted kids in his grade, he's in the highest reading and math groups and very atheletic. The three redshirted kids he knows are all massive violent troublemakers. So, no, not insecure...if anything, I feel bad for the kids who obviously haven't worked through the issues that caused them to be held back.
I have a child with a July 22 birthday who entered kindergarten last fall shortly after she turned 5 and honestly, at this point I wish we would have held her back. 6-8 kids in her class were 11-14 months older than her. She passed all the kindergarten benchmarks, is reading at a level C but she is also at the bottom of her class.
Your problem is people like OP. Your July child should not be in a kindergarten with kids 11-14 months older. That is insane.
Parenting has gone off the rails.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is how it typically plays out IMO:
Red shirted child does really well in school. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well, of course he is in the highest reading group. His mom had 10-12 more months to prep him"
Red shirted child does well in sports. Childs parents are very proud. Other parents dismiss these accomplishments, roll their eyes and say "well of course he's better than all the other kids. He's had almost another year of growing, coordinating and his dad had another 10-12 months of throwing the ball with him every night in the backyard."
It's almost like these kids accomplishments are put in another category and excused because they are so much older they are expected to be better. And yes, everyone knows who these kids are
LOLOL.
So the lesson is: if you're choosing your child's academic path in order to impress other parents, don't redshirt. Got it.
OP, this is what youl'll have to deal with: the rampant insecurity of parents who didn't redshirt and who are therefore furious and terrified that your child may have some kind of advantage over their snowflakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have an early September baby and the cutoff is Sept. 30. He's not even near kindergarten, but I'm redshirting 100%. I can afford childcare and there's no reason for my child to be the smallest in their class. Plus, an extra year of childhood. If you want to start your 4-year-old in kindergarten I don't care, but many of us make a different choice.
Here's the difference-- a September baby really is on the bubble, will be the absolute youngest, and really may not be ready-- especially a boy. A May baby SHOULD be older than about 40% of his class, maybe more since there always seem to be a lot of late spring/summer babies. The May baby is average, and the September baby is the outlier. Everybody defending red shirting their August/ September DS is comparing apples and oranges.
The hyperventilating anti-redshirters here on DCUM don't distinguish between people who redshirt a kid on the cusp and people who redshirt a May birthday. Yours is maybe the only comment I've ever read from somebody who seems to oppose redshirting but who nonetheless points out that Aug/Sept is different than May/June.