Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The take away from this whole thread, and this whole forum for that matter - why do I keep coming back to this snakepit of a website? - is this: Haters gonna hate.
Good luck OP!
I don't see where you are finding the hate on this thread, PP. It doesn't seem like anyone said SWS wasn't a very nice school. Maybe not everyone's first choice, but no one was hating on the school. It is quite an outlier in terms of DCPS programming (an apparently its school population) so makes sense that people are curious as to why, but that doesn't amount to disparaging it.
Anonymous wrote:My problem with SWS is the utter lack of diversity. In staff and also students. A city-wide DC public school with what, less than 10 black kids and only 1 black lead teacher? I think they should make admissions be equal from all wards. If they have 40 prek3 spots, 5 spots should go to each Ward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone know if the wait list has moved, or expected to move for 1st? Our number hasn't changed but I know its not always current.
I don't think any spots were listed as being open during the lottery for 1st-4th, right? Consequently, in order for the waitlist to move, a family on the waitlist ahead of you has to accept a spot elsewhere or a family already at the school has to leave. Families currently at the school don't have to submit their registration paperwork until June (like all other DCPS) so I wouldn't expect the waitlist for 1st-4th to start moving (if it does) in a meaningful way (i.e., there is actually a spot at the school for someone to take) until mid June or so.
Sorry to not have better news.
Anonymous wrote:I'm one of the WOH SWS parents above--one who thinks 1) we do have a lot of SAHMs and 2) it's to the benefit of the school but 3) that leads some WOH parents to feel left out.
I hope no one takes that to mean that SWS has deep-seated problems or is less of a school. It is a fantastic school by any measure; I am already dreading the day when my kids, who have only ever known the warm, open atmosphere of SWS, have to move on to another school. I give whatever time I can to the school, and it adds up to a few hours a month, but I know that is a drop in the bucket compared to some other parents. For a few, SWS is like an unpaid part-time job. Thank goodness for them!
That said, I think it's OK for people to say they feel left out of the clique. Many people are not up for wheedling their way into closed-looking conversations on the playground. And the volunteer demands at the school are significant. We do get emails from teachers saying, basically, that every family is expected to spend a day volunteering in the classroom each half-year, and that parental attendance at certain (daytime) events is basically mandatory. Each one individually sounds like not a big deal. But they do add up, and it can be hard on a family where both parents have inflexible jobs. And even if no one is keeping score, parents (OK, mostly moms in my experience) who are struggling to balance everything are always afraid of being perceived as not being active enough in the school community.
I actually felt much more that way when I first became an SWS parent years ago. I've come to realize that I can't do everything. And there are many other parents who can't do everything.
Anonymous wrote:I'm one of the WOH SWS parents above--one who thinks 1) we do have a lot of SAHMs and 2) it's to the benefit of the school but 3) that leads some WOH parents to feel left out.
I hope no one takes that to mean that SWS has deep-seated problems or is less of a school. It is a fantastic school by any measure; I am already dreading the day when my kids, who have only ever known the warm, open atmosphere of SWS, have to move on to another school. I give whatever time I can to the school, and it adds up to a few hours a month, but I know that is a drop in the bucket compared to some other parents. For a few, SWS is like an unpaid part-time job. Thank goodness for them!
That said, I think it's OK for people to say they feel left out of the clique. Many people are not up for wheedling their way into closed-looking conversations on the playground. And the volunteer demands at the school are significant. We do get emails from teachers saying, basically, that every family is expected to spend a day volunteering in the classroom each half-year, and that parental attendance at certain (daytime) events is basically mandatory. Each one individually sounds like not a big deal. But they do add up, and it can be hard on a family where both parents have inflexible jobs. And even if no one is keeping score, parents (OK, mostly moms in my experience) who are struggling to balance everything are always afraid of being perceived as not being active enough in the school community.
I actually felt much more that way when I first became an SWS parent years ago. I've come to realize that I can't do everything. And there are many other parents who can't do everything.
Anonymous wrote:Wow. I am such an a-hole. I've been walking around thinking all of these incredibly happy things at that school and this is the way it "really" is. Such a damn bummer. I hate DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Well, I don't know how many PPs are actually complaining of this phenomenon but I don't get it. At all. I feel nothing but warm fuzzies when I walk in that school - from teachers, admin, and parents. if SWS isn't getting it right I'm not sure anyone can. I've established some great relationships that I hope to keep for many years at this school. My experience has been opposite to what PPs are detailing. Almost everyone I've gotten to know seems thoughtful and genuine, even in their disagreements.
Is this a dynamic of the parents being instrumental in building the school? Is it a temporary dynamic? Trying not to be legitimately bummed out about this thread but It stings a bit. Do you really feel this way PPs? Like you're not welcome? Is there no way what you're experiencing is just harried DC parenting? Is there no way that you're reding more into it than you should?