Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nope, wouldn't do it. This is setting a dangerous precedent.
And who the f*** says no to free tickets because it's not an airline they fly? That's rude! Beggars can't be choosers.
They are die hard SWA fans, as much as you can be die hard fans of an airline when you only fly every 5 years. I'd thought about springing for first class for them (finally a use for the 700,000 miles I've got stashed), but not after this!
Anonymous wrote:This is why they will divorce in just s few years. Not ILs of course. OP and her DH.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did this get resolved?
They aren't coming. DH finally admitted that since they really don't care about the baptism itself, it doesn't make much sense to go out of our way for them like that.
I don't think he's told them that yet though.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, did this get resolved?
They aren't coming. DH finally admitted that since they really don't care about the baptism itself, it doesn't make much sense to go out of our way for them like that.
I don't think he's told them that yet though.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Point of clarification, which of these things happened:
1. You/DH offered the free awards tickets, and the in-laws said "we don't fly that airline, dear"
OR
2. You told your husband that he should offer them the awards tickets and he told you "they don't fly that airline, dear"
Huge difference.
OP, can you answer this question? You have never addressed it clearly, and people are assuming the inlaws are the jerks here, when it could also by your husband (or both).
Sorry. It was number 1. To DH's credit, he was a little taken aback, but told me he didn't know what else we could do.
Are you f... joking?
No. His exactly words were, "It's really important to us, so it's really important to them, so they need to be here." I want to tear my hair out.