Anonymous wrote:Fact: Public schools do have limited budgets.
Question: Do you really think that providing special education teachers for the gifted is a good use of funds?
Anonymous wrote:You still haven't posted anything that indicates the impact of not meeting the needs of advanced learners. So what if they're bored, uneganged and dismissive of school? That sounds like the average teenager. You utterly fail to understand what 'impact' means. What percentage of the student population is affected? You claim this is a widespread problem but you don't provide any information as to how widespread it is. The third article which you love so much is suspect because the author believes the reasons more isn't offered is because it "offends our egalitarian sensibilities" (if that were the case then why are LD kids receiving special education) and "the deep strain of anti-intellectualism that pervades our culture." Really?
Your inability to post a link, your inability to summarize information, your inability to provide statistics and the age of the articles you did provide (the most recent is from 2004, the oldest from 1996) all point to someone who has not done researched this area and expects people to just accept what she perceives to be true. I fully support differentiated instruction and AAP classes. You just haven't provided anything that indicates the needs of advanced learners aren't being met. You have provided nothing that supports your assertion that what's already being provided isn't sufficient. Everyone else who has chimed in indicates their advanced learners don't have the problem you claim yours does. Why don't you contact one of the 'many specialists' you claim are available to SN parents and see what she can do for you.
Anonymous wrote:So you've just admitted you're only here to troll and are only here to stir up shit and waste any opportunity of anyone actually having any kind of meaningful or productive dialogue.
LOL! Taking pleasure in pointing out the fallacy of your arguments isn't trolling. Besides, I've given you an incredible amount of useful information on what you need to do to be effective and successful in your arguments. The reason there hasn't been meaningful or productive dialogue is because you refuse repeated requests to back up your opinions with facts. I'd be happy to see what research is out there to support your position. With the exception of you, the parents of advanced learners on this thread indicated they don't have your problem. You insist that it is a problem but don't have anything to back you up. Looks like the problem is you.
Anonymous wrote:So you've just admitted you're only here to troll and are only here to stir up shit and waste any opportunity of anyone actually having any kind of meaningful or productive dialogue.
LOL! Taking pleasure in pointing out the fallacy of your arguments isn't trolling. Besides, I've given you an incredible amount of useful information on what you need to do to be effective and successful in your arguments. The reason there hasn't been meaningful or productive dialogue is because you refuse repeated requests to back up your opinions with facts. I'd be happy to see what research is out there to support your position. With the exception of you, the parents of advanced learners on this thread indicated they don't have your problem. You insist that it is a problem but don't have anything to back you up. Looks like the problem is you.
So you've just admitted you're only here to troll and are only here to stir up shit and waste any opportunity of anyone actually having any kind of meaningful or productive dialogue.
Anonymous wrote:Schools are supposed to meet students' academic needs. When students are wasting a large percentage of their time in school, their academic needs aren't being met.
You deflected didn't answer the question, what is your dog in this hunt? Why are you arguing so strenuously against it? Just to be contrarian, because your unwillingness to accept that it's a problem somehow magically makes the problem go away? Sorry, that doesn't cut it.
I didn't deflect, I just didn't answer it. I don't have any 'dog' in this. I just enjoy calling out ignorance and idiocy when I see it. So often we have to keep responses to stupid people. It's a unique sort of pleasure not to have to remain silent. Although, I have to say, the pleasure is wearing off with this particular thread because you just keep repeating the same things over and over as if that will make them true. If, in real life, you're carrying on about this like you are here, people think you're an idiot.
You're not going to get anywhere with the school or anyone else until and unless you can document need and impact. What you've spouted is insufficient. Being repetitive and emphatic doesn't prove anything. If you want people to take you seriously, start doing some research and drop the emotional responses.
Speaking of deflecting, you still haven't provided any names of all the specialists available to help SN parents
You haven't provided any statistics on the dropout rate for 'advanced' learners (yet claiming many do).
You haven't provided any statistics or research regarding the impact of not 'meeting the needs' of advanced learners.
Oh, if you're interested in actually doing something for your DC, you can search in the SN forum for recommendations for education consultants. They don't just work for kids needing IEPs. They also work for parent with 'advanced' learners. Otherwise, you're just spinning your wheels and talking out your ass.
Schools are supposed to meet students' academic needs. When students are wasting a large percentage of their time in school, their academic needs aren't being met.
You deflected didn't answer the question, what is your dog in this hunt? Why are you arguing so strenuously against it? Just to be contrarian, because your unwillingness to accept that it's a problem somehow magically makes the problem go away? Sorry, that doesn't cut it.
This thread seems to be going in several tracks. I don't think reading 3 grade levels ahead in and of itself constitutes a G&T need but I definitely think there should be supports appropriate to their level. Differentiation can be done to a limited extent by really good teacher, but more ideally there would be subject-oriented ability grouping (for example a student might be ahead in math, but behind in reading), to support students at a level appropriate to where they are. In particular, students who are lagging behind would get focused remedial help to get them up to grade level. But students who are ahead, would not be left to stagnate waiting for everyone else to catch up.