Anonymous wrote:I agree that the scenarios are all pretty tolerable for the Janney, Lafayette, Murch families that remain in boundary for those schools. I think, however that it is silly to make them controlled choice and mix up the families going to them given that they are doing so well now. They don't need a specialized program at one of those schools. Put those resources elsewhere.
I also think the NW boundary changes make senses and all the schools that the boundaries are moving homes between are very good schools and will continue to get better.
Further I support making slots at these schools available to children serves by low performing schools. That said, unless there is an income weight I fear that the majority of those set aside seats will go to high SES families zoned for low performing schools that have the resources to get their kids across town daily. This will not do much to close the achievement gap.
Anonymous wrote:Jeff, that about sums up my understanding of the proposals, and I'm at a loss as to why so many Ward 3 parents are hysterically suggesting that under reform, they will be presented with choice sets that include choices from the most remote and frightening quadrant of the city -- see above -- Marion Barry Educational Center vs. Janney -- as if....
Reality is that these proposals will be mostly status quo for those who have good options now, and for those who do not.
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
Under example A, the most extreme risk you face as a Janney parent is sending your kid to Murch or Lafayette. But, I am sure trauma specialists will be available to help you cope.
Jeff you seem to be the only one who understands this.
We were thinking of renting IB for deal, and are terrified that we could rent in tenleytown and our kids get sent elsewhere. That is possible in all 3 scenario, correct?
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
Under example A, the most extreme risk you face as a Janney parent is sending your kid to Murch or Lafayette. But, I am sure trauma specialists will be available to help you cope.
Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
That's just not happening on the elementary level. All the proposals call for neighborhood elementary schools so you can just simmer down now.
Anonymous wrote:"Controlled choice" is an Orwellian term. It is not choice if someone else controls it. Imagine having stretched and spent bongo-bucks for a tiny pre-WW II center hall brick colonial in AU Park so that your kids can attend Janney. Then someone in control says, because of the 20% OOB set aside, your choice will be to to Southeast and choose between Marion Barry Educational Center and Michael Brown Elementary School. Congratulations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm not trying to pick on you, but you're back to the 'poor kids can't learn' argument.
I never said poor kids can't learn. Students at our so-called "failing schools" ARE learning, but not all students learn at the SAME level and rate. Test scores are highly correlated with SES.