Anonymous wrote:Not 9:37, but I wanted to add to that comment:
In my view, as an LT parent (albeit only in K so far, but we're staying for 1st), the difference in demographics doesn't necessarily make the ECE program *better* than the rest of the school. (From what I've seen, the upper grades are just as strong.)
However, the demographic difference does seem to reassure many white and/or high-SES parents and make them more comfortable with the ECE program.
I've had people (not LT parents, but other Hill parents when they find out my kid is at LT) pretty much say flat-out that their problem with the upper grades is that they're almost entirely black.
Anonymous wrote:What about the ECE program makes it better than the upper grades?
Is it the teachers?
The students?
The parents?
The curriculum?
-Confused
Anonymous wrote:OP, there is a spring event on April 26 at LT. Lots of kids activities and a yard sale, etc. It's from 2-5. That would be a great way to meet a lot of current families in all grades. All the events I've gone to at LT have been well attended and supported by current families.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about the ECE program makes it better than the upper grades?
Is it the teachers?
The students?
The parents?
The curriculum?
-Confused
All of the above?
Parents are more likley to enroll a kid in ECE that they wouldn't enroll them in for K-12 because hey it's free preschool. The differences in socio economics and how they affect academics matter a hell of a lot less in a 3 or 4 year old. The curriculum (LT uses Reggio) is pretty good for kids. There is a low teacher to student ratio because of the teacher's aids so kids get a lot of individual attention and support.
Yeah, I don't get how a principal who apparently cares so little about parents that she won't give the time of day to a parent she sees in the hallway is supposed to care enough to seek out this thread and read it obsessively. Seriously, people, consider what you're saying.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I logged on after my self-imposed DCUM evening moratorium specifically for the purpose of flaming you. You, on the basis of scant, if any, knowledge, are criticizing a hard-working and apparently very successful civil servant because her AFFECT is not as deferential to you think all your vaunted Ivyness deserves. Can't you see how that comes off? You really need to check yourself before you get any further into this thing. I don't know what sort of steamrollering you are used to doing in your professional life, but it's not appropriate to apply that ethos here.
Odds are this is Cobbs. Way to specific and personal.
LOL. I doubt she has time for that...no offense.
No time to spare five minutes to post @ 8:18 in the evening? Spare me.
Umm no...no time to READ this crap.
Anonymous wrote:What about the ECE program makes it better than the upper grades?
Is it the teachers?
The students?
The parents?
The curriculum?
-Confused
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We might be relocating to the DC area this summer and so I'm desperately researching schools. Reading this thread on L-T has been interesting, and it sounds like it might be the school for us. Can with upper grade kids answer some practical questions for me?
How strict is the uniform policy? Our current school has uniforms... but there's no enforcement, and the rules are loose. (No restrictions on types of shoes or socks, hoodies are allowed, shirts don't have to be tucked in, etc.) Is this true here?
What kind of math do they use?
Are there any gifted programs? Music? Specifically strings?
All we have to do to get in is move into the school's cachement zone--this is correct?
How big are the classes?
Do the upper grades get recess every day? Cluster classes? (Science, art, computers, etc?)
In closing, a few words on all this randomness about the principal: I've heard similar complaints leveled against the principal we have now at our PS in New York. She's not warm and fuzzy, it's true--but being warm and fuzzy also isn't her job. Her job is to navigate the system and make sure the children in her care are provided for--all of them. From what you've all said, it sounds like she's actually doing a great job. A little yelling on the playground is not how I judge a school. Then again, I have also worked at a school, and come to realize that in a playground full of screaming children, sometimes I must raise my voice to get to be heard.
PP, virtually no one on this forum has kids in the upper grades. I'm not sure how familiar you are with DC public schools, but on Capitol Hill, there are a few "gentrified" schools where neighborhood kids are now reaching 3rd and 4th grades. For these schools, you could get some good information on the upper elementary grades. There are quite a few more not-so-gentrified schools where people go to preschool only. For these schools, you would have a very hard time getting good information on upper elementary grades. LT is somewhere in the middle with neighborhood kids now reaching 1st and 2nd grades. (And this is a gross generalization with many exceptions I imagine.)
I'll do my best to answer a couple of your questions:
- The older kids all seem to be in uniform when I see them...
- DC does not have gifted programs although there are certainly some schools working around this in imaginative ways.
- I sincerely doubt there's a strings program...
- Yes, all you need to do is move into the catchment zone from Kindergarten on. And right now, all inbounds kids in preschool do get in as well.
- There are lots and lots of arts classes because it is an arts integration school. And since the 4 year old do science, I have to imagine all the older kids do as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The sad face in the subject line is obnoxious
The sad face was that we were not matched at our preferred schools. You may not like it, but we were disappointed to begin the research again..... Many people are disappointed by the lottery. I did not realize how sensitive / how strong the inferiority complex is this group of parents is or I certainly wouldn't have used it.
Anonymous wrote:The sad face in the subject line is obnoxious