Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Which was my F**** point
But you have so many people who think their name brand degree makes them smarter and more deserving than their generic counterparts.
Please ...
Name brand schools have a thing called standards.
Even if they don't appear bright, they still proved themselves more than a Phoenix graduate.
Baby please..
There Are idiots at the University of Phoenix, MIT,Harvard and Montgomery County community college if you don't think idiots can get in any and everywhere you might want to take a second look.
Anyway, grown ass people trying to get by on where they went to school instead of WHAT they can do is the reason the Peter Principle is alive and well.
Where you went to school definitely matters. And equating a Univ of Phoenix degree with an ivy league degree, well, nevermind.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Which was my F**** point
But you have so many people who think their name brand degree makes them smarter and more deserving than their generic counterparts.
Please ...
Name brand schools have a thing called standards.
Even if they don't appear bright, they still proved themselves more than a Phoenix graduate.
Baby please..
There Are idiots at the University of Phoenix, MIT,Harvard and Montgomery County community college if you don't think idiots can get in any and everywhere you might want to take a second look.
Anyway, grown ass people trying to get by on where they went to school instead of WHAT they can do is the reason the Peter Principle is alive and well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Which was my F**** point
But you have so many people who think their name brand degree makes them smarter and more deserving than their generic counterparts.
Please ...
Name brand schools have a thing called standards.
Even if they don't appear bright, they still proved themselves more than a Phoenix graduate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Which was my F**** point
But you have so many people who think their name brand degree makes them smarter and more deserving than their generic counterparts.
Please ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Sometimes even people who went to name brand schools are also not so bright.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
![]()
Shame on your hiring panel, HR and manager (signed, a 26 yr. Fed manager).
The individual had the triple crown. Minority, Vet with disability rating, and female. I cringe everytime she tells me she went to school for a year at night to "graduate" with a "bachelors" from Phoenix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
![]()
Shame on your hiring panel, HR and manager (signed, a 26 yr. Fed manager).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for the government and see this daily. Our agency recently put out an announcement for a budget analyst position.
Who do we hire? Minority vet with a degree in HR from University of Phoenix. The individual can't even run a basic function in excel. The whole department consists of a few competent analysts and a whole bunch of other people who are terrible at their job but were hired by the gov't for one reason or another.
![]()
Shame on your hiring panel, HR and manager (signed, a 26 yr. Fed manager).
The individual had the triple crown. Minority, Vet with disability rating, and female. I cringe everytime she tells me she went to school for a year at night to "graduate" with a "bachelors" from Phoenix.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work for the government and see this daily. Our agency recently put out an announcement for a budget analyst position.
Who do we hire? Minority vet with a degree in HR from University of Phoenix. The individual can't even run a basic function in excel. The whole department consists of a few competent analysts and a whole bunch of other people who are terrible at their job but were hired by the gov't for one reason or another.
![]()
Shame on your hiring panel, HR and manager (signed, a 26 yr. Fed manager).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I interned at the EPA in the 90s (long time ago I know). Almost all of the support staff was black. As a general rule, they did nothing all day. If you asked them to fax or fed ex something, they looked like you like you had two heads. Now, that said, the lawyers worked their asses off (and were very diverse, all races and religions), so this is not a racial thing but an employment/union thing. It was pathetic.
So, the lawyers sent their own faxes and Fed Ex shipments?
yep. and the admin talked on the phone with their friends all day.
what kind of a person cannot send their own fax or fedex?
To me that is outright ridiculous, almost like expecting someonevat the office to bring you coffee
Think the point is that the support staff were hired to do this job. They are being paid to do this as their job and collecting expensive benefits. If the people who they supported did this on their own, there would be no reason to hire support staff.
Also, the people who they support focus on their job and the support staff, generally who are paid less (maybe not so true in
government) do their work at a lower cost. Kind of like a client paying for $5/5 minutes of clerical work vs $1/5 minutes.