Anonymous wrote:America is this wierd mix of puritanical and hyper-sexual. Reading this thread I can see why. God forbid any parents teach their kids that sex is a natural part of life, and to be enjoyed in the context of a loving relationship. So instead, you get unsafe hookups in parking lots or 27 year old virgins.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP above. My parents never said No no no. We never talked about sex, which I very much appreciated. No boring lectures about meaningful respectful relationships blah blah blah... what kind of crap is that? They had no interest in meeting my boyfriends until I was engaged.
And thats good?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am the PP above. My parents never said No no no. We never talked about sex, which I very much appreciated. No boring lectures about meaningful respectful relationships blah blah blah... what kind of crap is that? They had no interest in meeting my boyfriends until I was engaged.
And thats good?
Anonymous wrote:Sorry, but what does space have to do with hookup culture? To the contrary, when you make sex convenient, you encourage lots of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Underage sex is underage sex. Host it and you get trouble. Real, long-lasting legal trouble -- along with the kids.
How can I face the other teen's mom and either casually mention that the teens had a sleepover, or gloss over it? I know that I would bite the head off anyone who allowed kids to go there on their watch.
So no way, no how in my house. Underage sex is also high school sex -- which, when it leads to a pregnancy, can derail a future for all involved -- children, baby (if that is the choice), us the parents left to help raise the baby when we're gunning for our retirement.
I didn't do it in HS, and I do hope I will raise kids who refrain from it in HS.
18 is an age at which most kids head to college. Yes, it can be really distracting to address the new sex issue as well as a move away and college work, greek life, if so inclined, etc. That, I do worry about. I do wish they will have the wisdom to ease into adult life, one controlled step at a time. Time will tell if they do.
But sex in high school? I hope not.
1. It is not illegal for two 17 year-olds to have sex. If its the law you are worried about, you should be more concerned about teens having sex in parking garages.
2. I agree about the dangers of pregnancies and STDs as well. Thats why I have had very direct conversations with my teen about safety. If all you say is "no no no," then you have no way of discussing this incredibly important topic if they are deciding "yes yes yes."
3. I want my teen to approach sex with the attitude of respect for his/her partner and in the context of a healthy, committed relationship. To me, sex in garages is not respectful and "not in my house" only encourages the hook up culture.
I don't need nor do I want the details. I do need to know my 17 year-old is safe and healthy.
I wonder how many of you have teens yet. I guess I don't see how putting my fingers in my ears and saying "la la la I can't hear you," shutting out the information, makes any sense on any parenting topic. Your teen will or will not have sex -- this is beyond your control. So the only question is how you deal with it. Pretending that it isn't happening isn't dealing with it. In ALL things you need to be available to talk to your teen. You can't have any kind of open communication if you are teaching them to be deceitful about what they are doing.
Anonymous wrote:Underage sex is underage sex. Host it and you get trouble. Real, long-lasting legal trouble -- along with the kids.
How can I face the other teen's mom and either casually mention that the teens had a sleepover, or gloss over it? I know that I would bite the head off anyone who allowed kids to go there on their watch.
So no way, no how in my house. Underage sex is also high school sex -- which, when it leads to a pregnancy, can derail a future for all involved -- children, baby (if that is the choice), us the parents left to help raise the baby when we're gunning for our retirement.
I didn't do it in HS, and I do hope I will raise kids who refrain from it in HS.
18 is an age at which most kids head to college. Yes, it can be really distracting to address the new sex issue as well as a move away and college work, greek life, if so inclined, etc. That, I do worry about. I do wish they will have the wisdom to ease into adult life, one controlled step at a time. Time will tell if they do.
But sex in high school? I hope not.
Anonymous wrote:Underage sex is underage sex. Host it and you get trouble. Real, long-lasting legal trouble -- along with the kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are a lot of parents here with boundary issues. How unfortunate for the young people.
I guess you are referring to those of us who think an older teen having sex in a committed relationship is fine and healthy.
So, parents of the "not in my house variety," what do you do when teen and significant other goes into teen's room and closes the door? Do you say they have to keep it open, to a 17 year-old? One foot on the floor? Seriously? Because when you have rules like "not in my house" you are much more into their business, spying, intruding, than if you just leave it up to them as long as they are discrete and safe.
I'm trying to figure out the benefit of forcing kids to have sex in parking garages. I'm just not seeing it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are a lot of parents here with boundary issues. How unfortunate for the young people.
I guess you are referring to those of us who think an older teen having sex in a committed relationship is fine and healthy.
So, parents of the "not in my house variety," what do you do when teen and significant other goes into teen's room and closes the door? Do you say they have to keep it open, to a 17 year-old? One foot on the floor? Seriously? Because when you have rules like "not in my house" you are much more into their business, spying, intruding, than if you just leave it up to them as long as they are discrete and safe.
I'm trying to figure out the benefit of forcing kids to have sex in parking garages. I'm just not seeing it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are a lot of parents here with boundary issues. How unfortunate for the young people.
I guess you are referring to those of us who think an older teen having sex in a committed relationship is fine and healthy.
So, parents of the "not in my house variety," what do you do when teen and significant other goes into teen's room and closes the door? Do you say they have to keep it open, to a 17 year-old? One foot on the floor? Seriously? Because when you have rules like "not in my house" you are much more into their business, spying, intruding, than if you just leave it up to them as long as they are discrete and safe.
I'm trying to figure out the benefit of forcing kids to have sex in parking garages. I'm just not seeing it.
I know I cannot stop my teen from having sex if he is set on doing so. I do not, however, have to like it, or provide a place for him to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there are a lot of parents here with boundary issues. How unfortunate for the young people.
I guess you are referring to those of us who think an older teen having sex in a committed relationship is fine and healthy.
So, parents of the "not in my house variety," what do you do when teen and significant other goes into teen's room and closes the door? Do you say they have to keep it open, to a 17 year-old? One foot on the floor? Seriously? Because when you have rules like "not in my house" you are much more into their business, spying, intruding, than if you just leave it up to them as long as they are discrete and safe.
I'm trying to figure out the benefit of forcing kids to have sex in parking garages. I'm just not seeing it.