Anonymous wrote:Okay, but going back to 7:51's post, what is the net profit for the school? Will Boosterathon take 40% plus the $2K set up out of the quoted $50K? Or is all of the $50K going to Haycock?

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They just raised $50,000, which means they must have had close to $100,000 in pledges. That's a lot of money!
They have $50,000 in pledges...now we have to see how much is collected. These pledges include those innocent elderly neighbors who pledged $50 a lap not realizing that's a total of $1250.
Actually, they received over $90k in pledges, which amounted to $50k for the school. We didn't fleece the neighbors but we did fleece grandma.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They just raised $50,000, which means they must have had close to $100,000 in pledges. That's a lot of money!
They have $50,000 in pledges...now we have to see how much is collected. These pledges include those innocent elderly neighbors who pledged $50 a lap not realizing that's a total of $1250.
Anonymous wrote:They just raised $50,000, which means they must have had close to $100,000 in pledges. That's a lot of money!
Anonymous wrote:The PTA provides funds to the school that supports regular yearly purchasing, etc. To buy technology, the school needs additional money than what the PTA already provides. My understanding is that the PTA didn't want to do a large fundraiser for technology this year so the school decided to do it instead. And, recognize that the next 3 years, the PTA will have to do large fundraising efforts for the renovation. As Kelly said, it's either now or never.
The last time the PTA did a large fundraiser for technology was 7 years ago (Silent Auction) and that was the last time technology was purchased. Hence, why the school is so behind.
I applaud Kelly and her staff, they're taking the only option they have to raise money for the school. I'm tired, frankly, of our parents complaining, criticizing, etc and instead should trust the teachers and staff what is needed most. Ask any teacher, they fully support the need and necessity of technology.
If you attended her coffee or PTA meeting, she recognized that 40% goes to Boosterthon (which is a typical deduction in any fundraising company). Less than 10% of actual donations come from parents.
It's clear the school needs help. I plan to write a flat donation to the school. All kids can run, so support the need for technology, give directly to the school and it's a win/win.
Anonymous wrote:Here's the testimony - when I read it, I don't see parents being mean or repeatedly speaking ill of others, the way that 21:13 does. I see parents urging the School Board to find a workable solution to the overcrowding at Haycock that also preserves its identity as a neighborhood school.
http://www.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/94AM8F593AA6/$file/Speakers'%20Testimonies.pdf
Those of you - whether Cluster 2 parents or others who enjoy treating Haycock like a pinata because you are envious or just enjoy stirring the pot - should be ashamed of yourselves. It is vicious and it serves no valid purpose. By every indication, the students moving to Lemon Road will have a great experience, in a school with dedicated teachers and administrators and in a program that has the critical mass considered necessary by educators of gifted children. Continuing to kvetch over decisions made months ago that didn't go your way makes you look very small. Surely you are capable of setting a better example for your children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doing good work there. Spend more time helping children study, less time worrying about other parents!
http://www.mathleague.com/downloads/gs1213/va-678-1213.pdf
http://www.sungazette.net/mclean-greatfalls-vienna-oakton/news/longfellow-mathcounts-team-regains-va-title/article_be9b0ecc-a118-11e2-ac9c-0019bb2963f4.html
This is like the Kid beauty pageants they show on TLC, where only 5 kids enter. Our center doesn't even participate in this and we have an excellent math program. Entire classes, in each grade, taught 2 years ahead in math instead of the standard 1 year ahead. I'm sure the education at haycock is good, but to say its the best bc of things like this is silly.
What a simply mean post. Why must you denigrate some students' hard work and achievements in order to try to prove your point that your school, too, has an "excellent math program"? You can have a terrific program and choose not to participate in these extracurriculars. Or a school with a so-so program can have some great students who do choose to do these extracurriculars. Either situation is fine. Why do you feel compelled to put down those individual kids' efforts by saying that these programs are like "a kid beauty pageant"? Why does it matter if there were five kids or 45 kids from a school participating? Their participation still reflects well on the school and most of all reflects well on the kids themselves. These kids worked to achieve something on their own time; don't put down their efforts to make some point about your school or any other school.
And no, I am not a parent of one of these kids -- in fact my kid does not go to any of the schools mentioned (and does not go to Haycock) and is not in Math Counts or math league at her own school. I just hate to see any kids' efforts dragged in the mud by parents posting on this forum who are just trying to score more snarky points against schools they dislike, or to defend their own schools. Just appreciate the fact that some kids did a good thing and worked hard, and don't try to use it to score points here.
Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty much disgusted by a lot of you, but thankful that your posts are anonymous. Perhaps you should think about reading your posts to your kids and think about how you would explain them. The content, tone, language, everything. I came on because I have concerns with the way boosterthon is run. Good fundraising % or not, it seems aggressively marketed. My son said "I need to have 10-12 people signed up so I can be a leader some day." I watched some of the videos and read the material and it's just unfairly marketed to the younger kids (1st grader). Although I will be leaving with a bit of information, most of these comments were not worth your time to type, can't we all be a more supportive community and not behave this way. To anyone who was forcibly redistricted, I hope your child/children don't suffer from these FCPS decisions. We're all in this for the kids right. - Haycock Parent