Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:thanks so much for posting an update to this disgusting case. as a Sidwell parent I am deeply disturbed by the school's handling of this case. But the real bad actors are the two parents and the psychologist with the zipper and email problem. The poor kid...

No way are you a Sidwell parent.

Bingo!

Anonymous wrote:thanks so much for posting an update to this disgusting case. as a Sidwell parent I am deeply disturbed by the school's handling of this case. But the real bad actors are the two parents and the psychologist with the zipper and email problem. The poor kid...

No way are you a Sidwell parent.

thanks so much for posting an update to this disgusting case. as a Sidwell parent I am deeply disturbed by the school's handling of this case. But the real bad actors are the two parents and the psychologist with the zipper and email problem. The poor kid...

Cat fight!

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

Why? What's your endgame? Why your obsession with these people you don't know?

You're coming off weird here, Jeff.

You have posted 21 messages in this thread during the last 3 days. Yet, you think that I'm obsessed? I don't have an endgame. I just provided an update to a story that has had a lot of interest here previously. I didn't know that you would be here to carry water for someone who previously used this website to tarnish the reputation of others, actually involving a paid PR professional in the process. I hope you are being paid for your efforts because, if not, you are being suckered.

I have absolutely not posted 21 messages. Not sure who you're talking to.

Strictly speaking, you are correct. Now you have posted 22. Do you want me to point them all out? If you still insist that you didn't post those, you should probably check to see who else has access to your iPhone and find out why they share your interest in this thread.

Not going back to count. That said, I did not bump the thread nor was I the first to question your intentions. I feel a connection to this family, ehich I assume you dont. I'm not being paid and I think your actions regarding the situation are super sketchy. Perhaps you ARE being paid and that's your prerogative. But you pretend to be a neutral administrator of the website, and to post intentionally inflammatory things about individuals ( regardless of your personal feelings about those individuals), especially identifiable children, is pretty nasty. You're right that I should stop bumping it, and wont post again.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

Why? What's your endgame? Why your obsession with these people you don't know?

You're coming off weird here, Jeff.

You have posted 21 messages in this thread during the last 3 days. Yet, you think that I'm obsessed? I don't have an endgame. I just provided an update to a story that has had a lot of interest here previously. I didn't know that you would be here to carry water for someone who previously used this website to tarnish the reputation of others, actually involving a paid PR professional in the process. I hope you are being paid for your efforts because, if not, you are being suckered.

I have absolutely not posted 21 messages. Not sure who you're talking to.

Strictly speaking, you are correct. Now you have posted 22. Do you want me to point them all out? If you still insist that you didn't post those, you should probably check to see who else has access to your iPhone and find out why they share your interest in this thread.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

Why? What's your endgame? Why your obsession with these people you don't know?

You're coming off weird here, Jeff.

You have posted 21 messages in this thread during the last 3 days. Yet, you think that I'm obsessed? I don't have an endgame. I just provided an update to a story that has had a lot of interest here previously. I didn't know that you would be here to carry water for someone who previously used this website to tarnish the reputation of others, actually involving a paid PR professional in the process. I hope you are being paid for your efforts because, if not, you are being suckered.

I have absolutely not posted 21 messages. Not sure who you're talking to.

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

Why? What's your endgame? Why your obsession with these people you don't know?

You're coming off weird here, Jeff.

You have posted 21 messages in this thread during the last 3 days. Yet, you think that I'm obsessed? I don't have an endgame. I just provided an update to a story that has had a lot of interest here previously. I didn't know that you would be here to carry water for someone who previously used this website to tarnish the reputation of others, actually involving a paid PR professional in the process. I hope you are being paid for your efforts because, if not, you are being suckered.

First time poster and just learning about this "scandal" on this thread. I think Jeff did nothing wrong posting an update to the case. There is this thing called freedom of speech. Information that is public domain is all fair game. The husband sounds like a lunatic. If he truly has custody, I feel badly for the children and all family members involved. Outrageous.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

Why? What's your endgame? Why your obsession with these people you don't know?

You're coming off weird here, Jeff.

Anonymous wrote:If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

I'm not the one complaining about it. If you want to keep it at the top of Recent Topics, I'll help.

If you want the thread gone Jeff ... Delete it vs bump it?

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this even a thread? Seriously. Question the motives of whoever drudged this up again.

That would be Jeff. And absolutely question the motives.

Why are you posting multiple replies and constantly attacking me? Don't you realize that every time you reply you bump the thread? Where was your concern about the children when the father started all of this? Where was your concern when his PR agent was contacting me to encourage me to publicize the story? I still have her emails. Would you like to see them?

There would be nothing to bump had you not resurrected it.

Also, I assume you can see from IP's I'm far from the only one who finds that sketchy.

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this even a thread? Seriously. Question the motives of whoever drudged this up again.

That would be Jeff. And absolutely question the motives.

Why are you posting multiple replies and constantly attacking me? Don't you realize that every time you reply you bump the thread? Where was your concern about the children when the father started all of this? Where was your concern when his PR agent was contacting me to encourage me to publicize the story? I still have her emails. Would you like to see them?

There would be nothing to bump had you not resurrected it.

Nothing surprises me from a school and community that couldn't care less about the sick and elderly.