Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My wife had her 3rd at 41, and her second at 37. It was fine for a while, but now that they're in MS and HS, we're HATING LIFE!!!. We're in our 50's and we should be free to travel and pick up and go as we please, but no, everything revolves around there school, sports, and social life. I wish I could give them away....I kid. Take it for FWIW, HAVE all YOUR KIDS WHEN YOU'RE YOUNG!!!
BTW, our first is 32...lol...huge gap..
Why did you wait so long to have #2 and #3?
So we started trying, my OB at that time told me I would never have any kids due to fibroids and I should have a hysterectomy. Well we changed docs, kept trying, and to the surprise of our currend doc had this beautiful miracle baby. Not wanting to have an only child, we tried again in a couple years, got pregnant and miscarried. This didn't stop us so we tried again and had #3. Don't get me wrong, I love them to death, I just I wish I had the energy when I was in my 30's. I'm always tired, can't get enough rest, find time to exercise, no social life, no me time - it's all about the kids. Anonymous wrote:My wife had her 3rd at 41, and her second at 37. It was fine for a while, but now that they're in MS and HS, we're HATING LIFE!!!. We're in our 50's and we should be free to travel and pick up and go as we please, but no, everything revolves around there school, sports, and social life. I wish I could give them away....I kid. Take it for FWIW, HAVE all YOUR KIDS WHEN YOU'RE YOUNG!!!
BTW, our first is 32...lol...huge gap..
My wife had her 3rd at 41, and her second at 37. It was fine for a while, but now that they're in MS and HS, we're HATING LIFE!!!. We're in our 50's and we should be free to travel and pick up and go as we please, but no, everything revolves around there school, sports, and social life. I wish I could give them away....I kid. Take it for FWIW, HAVE all YOUR KIDS WHEN YOU'RE YOUNG!!!
BTW, our first is 32...lol...huge gap..Anonymous wrote:Another point of view from someone raised by an "older parent". My dad was 42 when I was born in the 70s. My brother came along when dad was 45. He was an awesome very involved dad growing up, but definitely seemed "older". He was very old-fashioned and would sometimes embarrass me in school- not that that doesn't happen with younger parents. But- true story- dad was also a spend thrift. So, he walked into my class one time wearing throwback bell bottoms when they were totally not in style. I almost died. I was in like 5th grade at the time. Ironically, when I hit HS, bell bottoms were back in. So, I wore them during spirit week on 60s day and totally had EVERYONE begging to know where I got them and if they could borrow! Anyways, my dad has always been the "best" dad of my crew. Now that in my 30s, he's the best grandpa. But, clearly a grandpa nonetheless. Dementia has started to set in and he's really not the man who raised me any longer. He's in his late 70s now, and I'm dealing with issues related to his longterm care needs. That could happen with younger parents too. Also, late 70s is not "old old", so he could have early dementia. Anyways, in my mid 30s with two little ones and a hubby turning 40 this year, our lives are full spectrum- dealing with young kids and all that drama and the opposite scenario- elder care. So, I'm kinda stuck in the middle. I would take my dad any day just as he is- he's the most awesome man who raised me, but I wish he was a younger too. Especially on days when his memory is especially feeble. He couldn't find his glasses one day- he was wearing them. And he couldn't figure out why his phone wouldn't work- he was hold the tv remote to his year. At least we have some newfound humor!
Anonymous wrote:
Totally agree. So sad for kids to have older parents who won't be around for them when they have their own kids. Some witches here envision they can just snap their fingers and will live to be 90...not going to happen for most.
Anonymous wrote:Definitely too old. I really wish this trend of 40+ Moms would go away.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I think what you've learned here is that 40s is only too old if you can't handle being judged by judgmental people. It's all very nice to get on one's high horse and say everyone should reproduce by 32 but that's not the question on the table. We make choices and in delaying procreation you chose to invest in yourself and make yourself a better parent than you would have been at 25. In this part of the country, at this point in history, that's not a rare choice. The risk is you may have a kid who needs a better parent or it may be harder on you (physically or financially) to get a kid than it would have been. Can you handle that? If so, you're not too old.[/quote
+1
Anonymous wrote:PP you've got a great attitude and lucky kids
Anonymous wrote:OP again. Also wondering if you would recommend sticking with one child or if you think its better to provide a sibling even if it means having a baby at 41/42.