Anonymous
12/01/2012 17:37
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote: I would hope they would keep a local level IV at Haycock. As a base parent, I wouldn't want to be required to go to another schoo for services.
Guess what? ALL of us feel that way! And yet those of us whose kids have been required to go to Haycock for Level IV are somehow selfish, evil schemers because our kids are there...
Anonymous
12/01/2012 17:35
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course not! Why would the school board actually solve the problem when they can just move the kids around like numbers on a spreadsheet?
Gross. Who would want their kids going to school in the heart of Pimmit Hills unless they lived there?
I hope this is sarcasm. Otherwise, you sound like an elitist jerk.
Anonymous
12/01/2012 16:01
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Of course not! Why would the school board actually solve the problem when they can just move the kids around like numbers on a spreadsheet?
Gross. Who would want their kids going to school in the heart of Pimmit Hills unless they lived there?
Nice. Where do you live that's so fabulous?
Anonymous
12/01/2012 16:01
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Great idea. I would hope they would keep a local level IV at Haycock. As a base parent, I wouldn't want to be required to go to another schoo for services. A large number of the base kids appear to qualify for level IV services, so shipping them all out would leave the school way under capacity.
Then they wouldn't need the $15 million renovation.
BTW, most of the kids they are shipping out come from schools with no LLIV. I do support LLIV for Haycock if they remove the center. It makes sense.
Anonymous
12/01/2012 08:49
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:
Of course not! Why would the school board actually solve the problem when they can just move the kids around like numbers on a spreadsheet?
Gross. Who would want their kids going to school in the heart of Pimmit Hills unless they lived there?
Anonymous
12/01/2012 08:25
Subject: future at Haycock?
Great idea. I would hope they would keep a local level IV at Haycock. As a base parent, I wouldn't want to be required to go to another schoo for services. A large number of the base kids appear to qualify for level IV services, so shipping them all out would leave the school way under capacity.
Anonymous
12/01/2012 08:18
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Have you proposed this idea to the school board or are you just hoping they're trolling DCUM?
We have proposed it.
Anonymous
12/01/2012 01:23
Subject: future at Haycock?
Have you proposed this idea to the school board or are you just hoping they're trolling DCUM?
Anonymous
11/30/2012 21:54
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not going to be able build a new ES near Tysons before next year.
They could if they were just remodeling the Pimmit Center or the Dunn Loring center back into schools. It was done with the Devonshire center that is now Graham Road ES.
+1. Pimmit does not need much in the way of remodeling. It's been used for adult ed, and classrooms are in great shape, the library is empty but ready to go, and the cafeteria is no smaller than Haycock's or Lemon Road's.
That would be kind of strange. It's so close to Westgate, and not far from Lemon Road, either.
It wouldn't be strange if you just put all of the AAP kids in the area there. Take the kids from Haycock so it's no longer a center and put then there. It's about 450 students, maybe a little more.
Don't think this is going to happen.
Of course not! Why would the school board actually solve the problem when they can just move the kids around like numbers on a spreadsheet?
Anonymous
11/30/2012 21:10
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not going to be able build a new ES near Tysons before next year.
They could if they were just remodeling the Pimmit Center or the Dunn Loring center back into schools. It was done with the Devonshire center that is now Graham Road ES.
+1. Pimmit does not need much in the way of remodeling. It's been used for adult ed, and classrooms are in great shape, the library is empty but ready to go, and the cafeteria is no smaller than Haycock's or Lemon Road's.
That would be kind of strange. It's so close to Westgate, and not far from Lemon Road, either.
It wouldn't be strange if you just put all of the AAP kids in the area there. Take the kids from Haycock so it's no longer a center and put then there. It's about 450 students, maybe a little more.
Don't think this is going to happen.
Anonymous
11/30/2012 18:54
Subject: future at Haycock?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are not going to be able build a new ES near Tysons before next year.
They could if they were just remodeling the Pimmit Center or the Dunn Loring center back into schools. It was done with the Devonshire center that is now Graham Road ES.
+1. Pimmit does not need much in the way of remodeling. It's been used for adult ed, and classrooms are in great shape, the library is empty but ready to go, and the cafeteria is no smaller than Haycock's or Lemon Road's.
That would be kind of strange. It's so close to Westgate, and not far from Lemon Road, either.
It wouldn't be strange if you just put all of the AAP kids in the area there. Take the kids from Haycock so it's no longer a center and put then there. It's about 450 students, maybe a little more.