Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just here on DCUM, where there must be a dozen threads at any time devoted to it.
That's why I had asked to expwnd the description of the AAP forum to include all those discussions under one forum.
To answer OP's question, no, not sick of it. Lots to talk about, to best understand our kids and provide for their needs. In a year or a few I could lose interest when my kid's gifted IQ test results prove not to be stable, but for now, with a kid in the 99th percentile who's requiring teacher to find creative ways to accomodate, i am in complete info absorption mode, and any new thread is interesting.
I remember being at that stage. Hoagies is the best resource by far that I found. Has loads of information on being gifted. Also has great links for enrichment for kids.
http://www.hoagiesgifted.org
Tamara Fisher, a teacher in Montana for gifted children, has a great blog. For whatever reason, the link only seems to work on my phone if I'm in desktop mode before I go there.
http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/unwrapping_the_gifted/2007/08/my_yard_is_gifted_1.html
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just here on DCUM, where there must be a dozen threads at any time devoted to it.
That's why I had asked to expwnd the description of the AAP forum to include all those discussions under one forum.
To answer OP's question, no, not sick of it. Lots to talk about, to best understand our kids and provide for their needs. In a year or a few I could lose interest when my kid's gifted IQ test results prove not to be stable, but for now, with a kid in the 99th percentile who's requiring teacher to find creative ways to accomodate, i am in complete info absorption mode, and any new thread is interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Just here on DCUM, where there must be a dozen threads at any time devoted to it.
Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with being bored, exactly? It's a critical type of solitude.
Anonymous wrote:What's wrong with being bored, exactly? It's a critical type of solitude.
Anonymous wrote:How do you deal with a middle school class where some kids read at a college level, but others can't read at all? Most teachers don't and can't differentiate sufficiently to deal with those situations. They do a few things here and there but basically just pay lip service to it.
By middle school, the non readers should be in some other type of class.
Teachers tell themselves that but I think precious few actually manage to pull it off in any genuinely effective manner.
How do you deal with a middle school class where some kids read at a college level, but others can't read at all? Most teachers don't and can't differentiate sufficiently to deal with those situations. They do a few things here and there but basically just pay lip service to it.
How do you deal with a middle school class where some kids read at a college level, but others can't read at all? Most teachers don't and can't differentiate sufficiently to deal with those situations. They do a few things here and there but basically just pay lip service to it.
A handful were. Most weren't. Most teachers can't effectively differentiate in class and basically just teach to the middle and basically ignore the top and bottom performers.