Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, why didn't you offer to switch with the person seated next to your husband in the row without the extra space?
This has been covered. 3 seat row, 2 people sitting next to the husband were a couple. We done now?
No, not done. Why didn't OPs DH ask the person sitting in the window seat of Ops aisle? Why did they target aisle-man instead of window-man?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I neglected to mention something about the whole thing - at the time when DH asked the man if he would mind switching, neither of us realized that I (and the man) was seated in the 'economy plus' legroom seats or whatever. (as a PP mentioned, there isn't much difference between those seats and regular seats. If we had realized that my row had extra legroom (even though it's such a slight increase in space that it hardly makes a difference), we probably would not have asked the man if he would mind switching.
But anyway, now I would like to ask you - suppose that The man and I had been seated in a regular row. In your opinion, would it have still been rude to ask him to switch? And if we did ask in that scenario, and he did decline, does your opinion change with respect to his refusal? It would have been an aisle seat to aisle seat switch, BTW.
Regardless of what kind of row you are seated in: You are not rude to ask him to switch, and he is not rude for refusing. Let. It. Go.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, why didn't you offer to switch with the person seated next to your husband in the row without the extra space?
This has been covered. 3 seat row, 2 people sitting next to the husband were a couple. We done now?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think "being nice" means "allow others to take advantage of you at every opportunity."
Anonymous wrote:
When did you men become such delicate little flowers?
Anonymous wrote:
In your opinion, would it have still been rude to ask him to switch? And if we did ask in that scenario, and he did decline, does your opinion change with respect to his refusal? It would have been an aisle seat to aisle seat switch, BTW.
Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I neglected to mention something about the whole thing - at the time when DH asked the man if he would mind switching, neither of us realized that I (and the man) was seated in the 'economy plus' legroom seats or whatever. (as a PP mentioned, there isn't much difference between those seats and regular seats. If we had realized that my row had extra legroom (even though it's such a slight increase in space that it hardly makes a difference), we probably would not have asked the man if he would mind switching.
But anyway, now I would like to ask you - suppose that The man and I had been seated in a regular row. In your opinion, would it have still been rude to ask him to switch? And if we did ask in that scenario, and he did decline, does your opinion change with respect to his refusal? It would have been an aisle seat to aisle seat switch, BTW.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:not jerky. Even if you didn't pay more for the seat. Pregnant or not, it won't kill a husband and wife to sit apart for 2 hours.
Nobody's suggesting that this was a life or dearh situation. BUT, if the man wanted to do a good deed, he would have switched.
But he didn't, and he really wasn't obligated to. Maybe he had already done a good deed for the day, and didn't want to do another.
Yes, yes, of course. He wasn't obligated to switch seats. Still, the nice thing to do would have been to switch seats. Do people here acknowledge that this would have been the nice thing to do?
Is it nice for the man to have sore knees?
Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I neglected to mention something about the whole thing - at the time when DH asked the man if he would mind switching, neither of us realized that I (and the man) was seated in the 'economy plus' legroom seats or whatever. (as a PP mentioned, there isn't much difference between those seats and regular seats. If we had realized that my row had extra legroom (even though it's such a slight increase in space that it hardly makes a difference), we probably would not have asked the man if he would mind switching.
But anyway, now I would like to ask you - suppose that The man and I had been seated in a regular row. In your opinion, would it have still been rude to ask him to switch? And if we did ask in that scenario, and he did decline, does your opinion change with respect to his refusal? It would have been an aisle seat to aisle seat switch, BTW.
Anonymous wrote:OP here again. I neglected to mention something about the whole thing - at the time when DH asked the man if he would mind switching, neither of us realized that I (and the man) was seated in the 'economy plus' legroom seats or whatever. (as a PP mentioned, there isn't much difference between those seats and regular seats. If we had realized that my row had extra legroom (even though it's such a slight increase in space that it hardly makes a difference), we probably would not have asked the man if he would mind switching.
But anyway, now I would like to ask you - suppose that The man and I had been seated in a regular row. In your opinion, would it have still been rude to ask him to switch? And if we did ask in that scenario, and he did decline, does your opinion change with respect to his refusal? It would have been an aisle seat to aisle seat switch, BTW.
No, OP, it's not rude to ask, nor is it rude for him to decline. It doesn't matter what row or what type of seat. He didn't want to move and that is OK.