Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly the fact that Hebrew is one of the languages on which the Western Civilization (a.k.a Judeo-Christian) is based has escaped some people. Do you really think that the Bible was written is English?? Maybe you don't care about the Bible, but you should care about the civilization you live in, even if it is not your own.
Allegedly, the school will be Modern Hebrew immersion, a language that has only been existence since the early 20th century. It is not the language upon which western civilization is based. It is a very interesting language, with influences from many other world languages. However, the argument that it is worthy to base an immersion school on Modern Hebrew because it is the language of the Bible is false.
Not really true from a historical perspective. Modern Hebrew is based on biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, and other Semitic languages, with influences from Turkish, Arabic, Ladino, Yiddish, and other European languages. A Modern Hebrew speaker could encounter a speaker of biblical Hebrew on the street and have a conversation, much in the way that speaker of contemporary Latin American Spanish could chat with Cervantes, or a speaker of Modern Greek could converse with Plato. Moreover, Modern Hebrew developed was developed over two centuries, beginning in the mid-1880s, and is spoken by nearly 12 million people worldwide. Of course, this is a SECULAR school, so talking about whether Jesus spoke Hebrew (yep! along with Aramaic, Greek, Latin, etc.) is not really the point...At this point, in the context of all of the other niche charter schools in existence, we probably should asking ourselves why Hebrew is so "threatening?" Are we afraid the "Jew" is catchy? Would you be making the same arguments about Swedish, or Swahili, or Sanskrit? For many of those posting here it seems to be a personal bias thing which is not too pretty. I personally wish we didn't have charter schools, but rather had strong corner public schools, but that is not our reality. The Hebrew charter seems as good as any charter, and much better than some I have visited. Lapsed Catholic and mother of two.
I really hate that you are trying to turn this discussion into an anti-Judaism thing, and am frankly offended. I don't think the school has much to offer people who aren't Jewish. That has nothing to do with being scared or threatened by anyone! I think other super niche charter schools that serve a small groups of people are also not the best, (and I don't really love that Roots PCS is clearly only for African American children) however since this one's niche is a religion, I see it as a little more controversial. That is just my opinion. I would personally PREFER (note that I say prefer, not 'those schools shouldn't get charters') that immersion schools focus on languages that would be in the top 20 or 30 in this list, and therefore cast a wider net of interest and utility:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_languages_by_number_of_native_speakers
The number of Hebrew speakers in the link above conflicts with yours btw, but even if this is wrong and you are right, its not even close to what I would consider a widely spoken language.
It is hard to argue with people who cite wikipedia as evidence. People who make statements like "I don't think the school has much to offer people who aren't Jewish," and assert, out of their ass, that the school's "niche is religion." but then somehow, accuse posters of " trying to turn this discussion into an anti-Judaism thing, when they point out you are full of it. 1. Non-Jews speak Modern Hebrew; 2. the school is NOT religious; 3. charter schools are by definition niche schools, they exist to give people options; 4. not all speakers of a language are fluent - presumably the non-linguist who posted the wikipedia listing is taking some number of Israeli population numbers which are near 8 million - state department figures peg around 12 million Hebrew speakers. Swedish speakers number about 11 million as a comparison. 4. No one is arguing that either language is widely-spoken, but the whole tenor of your exchange suggests you are fixated on a "controversy" that doesn't exist. Ask yourself if you would do the same about another language. Doubtful....l and that should be offensive to all non-Jews, as well as Jews.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Clearly the fact that Hebrew is one of the languages on which the Western Civilization (a.k.a Judeo-Christian) is based has escaped some people. Do you really think that the Bible was written is English?? Maybe you don't care about the Bible, but you should care about the civilization you live in, even if it is not your own.
Allegedly, the school will be Modern Hebrew immersion, a language that has only been existence since the early 20th century. It is not the language upon which western civilization is based. It is a very interesting language, with influences from many other world languages. However, the argument that it is worthy to base an immersion school on Modern Hebrew because it is the language of the Bible is false.
Not really true from a historical perspective. Modern Hebrew is based on biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, and other Semitic languages, with influences from Turkish, Arabic, Ladino, Yiddish, and other European languages. A Modern Hebrew speaker could encounter a speaker of biblical Hebrew on the street and have a conversation, much in the way that speaker of contemporary Latin American Spanish could chat with Cervantes, or a speaker of Modern Greek could converse with Plato. Moreover, Modern Hebrew developed was developed over two centuries, beginning in the mid-1880s, and is spoken by nearly 12 million people worldwide. Of course, this is a SECULAR school, so talking about whether Jesus spoke Hebrew (yep! along with Aramaic, Greek, Latin, etc.) is not really the point...At this point, in the context of all of the other niche charter schools in existence, we probably should asking ourselves why Hebrew is so "threatening?" Are we afraid the "Jew" is catchy? Would you be making the same arguments about Swedish, or Swahili, or Sanskrit? For many of those posting here it seems to be a personal bias thing which is not too pretty. I personally wish we didn't have charter schools, but rather had strong corner public schools, but that is not our reality. The Hebrew charter seems as good as any charter, and much better than some I have visited. Lapsed Catholic and mother of two.
Anonymous wrote:Congrats, immediate PP, for the most idiotic post of the day.
Anonymous wrote:Clearly the fact that Hebrew is one of the languages on which the Western Civilization (a.k.a Judeo-Christian) is based has escaped some people. Do you really think that the Bible was written is English?? Maybe you don't care about the Bible, but you should care about the civilization you live in, even if it is not your own.
Allegedly, the school will be Modern Hebrew immersion, a language that has only been existence since the early 20th century. It is not the language upon which western civilization is based. It is a very interesting language, with influences from many other world languages. However, the argument that it is worthy to base an immersion school on Modern Hebrew because it is the language of the Bible is false.
Clearly the fact that Hebrew is one of the languages on which the Western Civilization (a.k.a Judeo-Christian) is based has escaped some people. Do you really think that the Bible was written is English?? Maybe you don't care about the Bible, but you should care about the civilization you live in, even if it is not your own.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like a justification for its existence to me. DC doesn't need a Hebrew immersion school. What DC needs is better charter options that serve the needs of all the kids in the city and doesn't waste time on a difficult language they will never use.
Anonymous wrote:Clearly, 12:34, you don't speak Hebrew.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like a justification for its existence to me. DC doesn't need a Hebrew immersion school. What DC needs is better charter options that serve the needs of all the kids in the city and doesn't waste time on a difficult language they will never use.
Anonymous wrote:It sounds like a justification for its existence to me. DC doesn't need a Hebrew immersion school. What DC needs is better charter options that serve the needs of all the kids in the city and doesn't waste time on a difficult language they will never use.
Anonymous wrote:I think its weird to justify the existence of this school by saying, "people who are not Jewish will go because they are just so desperate, they don't care if their kid will learn a language they will never use." I know that this is true and could very well happen. I also understand why they were approved by the charter board, technically. But to me personally, having a school that seems like it will be for either children of one religion or families who have no other options is just kind of lame. I think most non-Jewish families would choose many many other languages over Hebrew, so this would really be a last resort for them. Don't they want families that are committed to Hebrew immersion itself - and who are those people that are not Jewish? Maybe I'm wrong but it just seems off to me. I guess I would say the same thing for a Danish immersion school.
This!