Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vinyl siding.
Vinyl replacement windows.
Fake muntins.
palladian windows.
stuck on shutters.
two story foyers.
pavers
and evn hardie plank.
You must hate my home![]()
Yikes!
A stunning example of bad taste.
pp, that was mean.
The above house is not bad, but it does lack depth and warmth, and the windows could have been better quality. You have to look at them a lot, so best to spend some $$ there. I would have gone with a more gunpowder blue/gray and toned down the white a few notches to a grayer cream, and added some true stone around the base (like porch supports). But overall it is pleasant.
My guess is the owner of this home didn't paint it this color, her builder did. It so wasteful to have to redo all the crap that builders build.
I like the color, and the shingles. Though I wouldn't want the house (too big for us.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I used to hate split levels until I moved into one. And brick. And vinyl siding. Guess what? We weren't going to find a house we could afford in a neighborhood we liked around here that wasn't a rambler or split-level, and half-brick / half-vinyl.
Turns out split-levels are super functional. Who knew? And when I drive through my neighborhood these days, I think "what a nice place to live" instead of "these houses are all so ugly".
I still really hate the decorative glass plating on our front door though
Agree, this is the general consensus if you want to live in a good area and aren't a millionaire you will need to live in an older uglier house than a newer nice looking McMansion.
Anonymous wrote:If I had to replace windows I would put the cheap ones in the back and side and spend some money to do a nice jb in the front with better quality.
WRT Hardie plank, it can look redundant, but it is better than vinyl.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vinyl siding.
Vinyl replacement windows.
Fake muntins.
palladian windows.
stuck on shutters.
two story foyers.
pavers
and evn hardie plank.
You must hate my home![]()
Yikes!
A stunning example of bad taste.
pp, that was mean.
The above house is not bad, but it does lack depth and warmth, and the windows could have been better quality. You have to look at them a lot, so best to spend some $$ there. I would have gone with a more gunpowder blue/gray and toned down the white a few notches to a grayer cream, and added some true stone around the base (like porch supports). But overall it is pleasant.
My guess is the owner of this home didn't paint it this color, her builder did. It so wasteful to have to redo all the crap that builders build.
Anonymous wrote:
As a logical person I understand brick vs siding, colors etc... is all taste but when it comes down to square footage and living space EVERYONE can agree a larger newer home is better then living in an 1300 SQRFT bunglo from 1940
Anonymous wrote:Garage doors on the front of a house is utterly HIDEOUS and tacky. The garage doors can NOT be on the front of a house.
Hate all to wall2wall carpet (crapet). Having a mice carpet (like a pretty wool Stark) bound and used as an area rug or cut to a rooms dimensions with a few feet of wood flooring showing in a border is very pretty though.
And, of course the houses with an more $$ material on front (brick or stone) and nasty siding on the other 3 sides. Also, too much mixed material on the outside of a home (stone and brick and clapboard and raw deck wood etc....).
Drywall. Sadly though its unavoidable these days. Our houses have all had plaster walls but you can not avoid drywall if there is an addition or renovation.
Low ceilings
Most of this stuff is only found on new houses and I (usually only) like older house.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Vinyl siding.
Vinyl replacement windows.
Fake muntins.
palladian windows.
stuck on shutters.
two story foyers.
pavers
and evn hardie plank.
You must hate my home![]()
Yikes!
A stunning example of bad taste.
pp, that was mean.
The above house is not bad, but it does lack depth and warmth, and the windows could have been better quality. You have to look at them a lot, so best to spend some $$ there. I would have gone with a more gunpowder blue/gray and toned down the white a few notches to a grayer cream, and added some true stone around the base (like porch supports). But overall it is pleasant.
Anonymous wrote:OP, why do you hate palladian windows?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think there is no right and wrong for this topic, Just purely personal taste.
+1
As a logical person I understand brick vs siding, colors etc... is all taste but when it comes down to square footage and living space EVERYONE can agree a larger newer home is better then living in an 1300 SQRFT bunglo from 1940
On the contrary, we like smaller spaces. Easier to clean, heat, live in - we purposely chose a 1928 bungalow and not a new, large home for this reason.