Anonymous wrote:It took 2 hours due to the fact that intake had to occur and pre-op testing had to be completed (which was dealyed when the Mom was non-cooperative and ripped out her IV). The fetus was monitored during this time and there were no signs of fetal distress that would have warranted a quicker c-section. The experts who reviewed the case indicated that the damage had been done during the 20 hours of home labor. The post birth blood gases did not indicate metabolic acidosis at the time of birth, which would have been indicative of HIE. Bottom line: the damage had been done prior to arrival at JHH and the jury blew it.
Anonymous wrote:It took 2 hours due to the fact that intake had to occur and pre-op testing had to be completed (which was dealyed when the Mom was non-cooperative and ripped out her IV). The fetus was monitored during this time and there were no signs of fetal distress that would have warranted a quicker c-section. The experts who reviewed the case indicated that the damage had been done during the 20 hours of home labor. The post birth blood gases did not indicate metabolic acidosis at the time of birth, which would have been indicative of HIE. Bottom line: the damage had been done prior to arrival at JHH and the jury blew it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not really about Evelyn, it's about reproductive rights, including where a woman has a right to give birth.
This is a difficult question. One of the charges against her comes from a VBAC at home that resulted in rupture and infant death.
Should a woman be allowed to attempt a VBAC at home? I don't know. There is another party involved, a term baby.
I'm sorry, but no, it's not a difficult question. You don't get to make decisions about my body in the interest of my baby.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is not really about Evelyn, it's about reproductive rights, including where a woman has a right to give birth.
Yes, and I am absolutely horrified at those charges, because they show that medical professionals are willing to attack home birth merely because women are choosing something different than what they recommend - especially when what THEY recommend is often not even evidence-based. I honestly don't see where Evelyn did anything WRONG; in each of those cases things were going poorly and she appropriately transferred to the hospital, and in most cases mom and baby turned out fine. Again, the doctor decides he doesn't like the protocols of the midwife, gets pissed when she (rightly) transfers to a hospital, complains and then he gets to make her stop practicing, strip her of her license, and take her livelihood away. You could take each and every one of these situations that were stated, and explain why it is still a reasonable option for a woman to choose homebirth. Medical professionals should not have the right to dictate where we give birth, even if we are obese, or might have a large baby, or have a prior c/s, or have a breech baby. This is absolutely a political fight. Doctors/hospitals HATE homebirth and think they should have the right to dictate to all of us how we give birth. They completely remove the individual woman from the equation, when in fact we are the ones that should be able to make these choices for ourselves.
Women and babies die in our hospitals every day in this country giving birth, yet there are no reports flaunting the errors (or just bad luck) of the physicians attending those births. Why in God's name should THEY have the right to flaunt the errors (or just bad luck) of midwife attended homebirths?
Anonymous wrote:Bullshit. Every time something goes wrong with a homebirth you hear about it. Things go wrong in hospitals (often because of problems with care) and it almost NEVER makes the news.
I wish people would stop sounding off and making it sound like a homebirth is courting disaster. A well trained, experienced midwife knows exactly when to transfer and what to do in case of the unexpected. She is LESS likely to have problems than an OB for a multitude of reasons. You need to understand that many problems are caused by interventions in the hospital.
In 30 years my midwife has had exactly two emergency transfers to the hospital and both of them were appropriate and resulted in the optimum care for the mother and baby (and no problems, in case that wasn't clear). However, I know that she also transfers patients to the hospital or to another provider routinely, because they are no longer low risk or, if during labor, for failure to progress -- a non emergency issue.
A homebirth is not appropriate for everyone but Ipersonally am much more afraid of the hospital and unnecessary interventions than I am of being at home. By using a midwife I have taken steps to minimize the inherent risks of childbirth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the hospital had the mother wait for 2 hours before giving her the c-section
It would have been a totally different outcome if the hospital had been able to give her the medical care she needed when she arrived
How do you know? You don't. So quit talking out of your ass.
Anonymous wrote:And the hospital had the mother wait for 2 hours before giving her the c-section
It would have been a totally different outcome if the hospital had been able to give her the medical care she needed when she arrived
Anonymous wrote:It seems like the fault (according to the courts) was the fault of the hospital, not the midwife. Am I correct?