Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:From the OP:
//I think they may have a real shot at stronger CS/engineering fits like Georgia Tech, MIT, CMU, Purdue, UIUC, Michigan, Cornell Engineering, Princeton, Stanford, Berkeley, etc.//
The bolded are such a long shot, tbh.
I hope the OP can come back to answer the questions of many thoughtful posters who took the time to respond to this thread.
Georgia Tech OOS is a tougher admit than CMU
CMU admission rate just over 11% and higher if apply Early Decision
Georgia Tech this cycle: Overall Admit Rate OOS 8.9%, Engineering OOS Admit Rate 7.2%
Anonymous wrote:From the OP:
//I think they may have a real shot at stronger CS/engineering fits like Georgia Tech, MIT, CMU, Purdue, UIUC, Michigan, Cornell Engineering, Princeton, Stanford, Berkeley, etc.//
The bolded are such a long shot, tbh.
I hope the OP can come back to answer the questions of many thoughtful posters who took the time to respond to this thread.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience parents that think their kids can aim higher than UVA end up not getting into UVA and get shook.
Anonymous wrote:I personally think there is something wrong with the school if standardized test scores do not align with GPAs. If a student is earning straight As in all AP and DE courses with a near-perfect GPA, but cannot score at a similarly high level on the SAT or ACT, that raises a concern about whether the curriculum or grading standards reflect true mastery.
I recently read a thread about a student with a 4.2+ GPA who could not break 1300 on the SAT. How is that acceptable if the GPA is supposed to reflect mastery at that level?
I also think the reverse can be true. If a student scores a 1550 or 1600, especially if that is far above the average for their high school, but is still earning Bs or B+s while genuinely trying, then maybe the issue is not the student. Maybe the school’s curriculum, grading system, or expectations are too harsh or inconsistent.
At the end of the day, SAT and ACT scores are the equalizer because they cut through some of the noise and show how a student performs on the same standard as everyone else. That is why I think they should be weighted heavily, especially when they offset inconsistencies in school grading. FCPS is not ideal, and that should be taken into consideration when evaluating a student’s GPA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my experience parents that think their kids can aim higher than UVA end up not getting into UVA and get shook.
This is what I would worry about as well, but 1600 in state with rigor should get into UVA... but I guess the should is the unknown.
If your child is excited about UVA I would ED there, get in, and save a ton on tuition.
Anonymous wrote:In my experience parents that think their kids can aim higher than UVA end up not getting into UVA and get shook.
Anonymous wrote:I personally think there is something wrong with the school if standardized test scores do not align with GPAs. If a student is earning straight As in all AP and DE courses with a near-perfect GPA, but cannot score at a similarly high level on the SAT or ACT, that raises a concern about whether the curriculum or grading standards reflect true mastery.
I recently read a thread about a student with a 4.2+ GPA who could not break 1300 on the SAT. How is that acceptable if the GPA is supposed to reflect mastery at that level?
I also think the reverse can be true. If a student scores a 1550 or 1600, especially if that is far above the average for their high school, but is still earning Bs or B+s while genuinely trying, then maybe the issue is not the student. Maybe the school’s curriculum, grading system, or expectations are too harsh or inconsistent.
At the end of the day, SAT and ACT scores are the equalizer because they cut through some of the noise and show how a student performs on the same standard as everyone else. That is why I think they should be weighted heavily, especially when they offset inconsistencies in school grading. FCPS is not ideal, and that should be taken into consideration when evaluating a student’s GPA.
Anonymous wrote:3.8 gpa may pose an issue at the super elite schools