If they aren't, they can repeat or take ab then bc or stats the bc or stats then ab etcAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s been surprisingly successful at my child’s school. They have two full classes of 6th grade algebra students (and 2 of 6th grade advanced math).
What I will say is from helping neighbor kids who stayed at the base school, the online version is very, very remedial compared to what is taught in a typical algebra 1 class. If online is the only option, I might hold back.
I think the measure of success will come later. Will these kids be able to handle calculus when they are high school sophomores? What options for math will be available to them as juniors and seniors? How will this impact their college choices?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
There is no research to support this endeavor. There is no why? This Superintendent doesn’t have the guts to make a stand and say to Parents that we (FCPS) aren’t doing this because it is not in long term best interest of students. If students are “bored” in mathematics then let’s provide a solution that doesn’t involve hyper-acceleration.
Old research is stale. FCPS parents want to move past outdated thinking. When 600+ 6th grade students are in Algebra 1 and majority are doing well, that’s real, current data right there. About as reliable as it gets!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
There is no research to support this endeavor. There is no why? This Superintendent doesn’t have the guts to make a stand and say to Parents that we (FCPS) aren’t doing this because it is not in long term best interest of students. If students are “bored” in mathematics then let’s provide a solution that doesn’t involve hyper-acceleration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got the same email. Superintendent Reed has been really pushing to get more kids through Alg I by 8th. So each year one of the requirements is removed. Last year they did away with the Iowa assessment. Now I guess they're nixing the SOL requirement as well. Our kid is in level IV but we opted out of Alg I this year because it would have been virtual at our school (not great for a kid with pretty bad ADHD). But good to know we don't need to stress about the SOL anymore.
Superintendent Reed is answering the needs of advanced students, as requested by us the parents. You opted out and did what's suitable for your kid. We kept our student in Alg1 since our student felt it's appropriate fit. What seems to be the problem here?
the problem is reid is taking away all previous academic requirements to take it this early. no 91% on iowa, no pass advance, no math 7 assessment before they start. kids who just regular pass shouldn’t be given the option
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
Anonymous wrote:It’s been surprisingly successful at my child’s school. They have two full classes of 6th grade algebra students (and 2 of 6th grade advanced math).
What I will say is from helping neighbor kids who stayed at the base school, the online version is very, very remedial compared to what is taught in a typical algebra 1 class. If online is the only option, I might hold back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got the same email. Superintendent Reed has been really pushing to get more kids through Alg I by 8th. So each year one of the requirements is removed. Last year they did away with the Iowa assessment. Now I guess they're nixing the SOL requirement as well. Our kid is in level IV but we opted out of Alg I this year because it would have been virtual at our school (not great for a kid with pretty bad ADHD). But good to know we don't need to stress about the SOL anymore.
Superintendent Reed is answering the needs of advanced students, as requested by us the parents. You opted out and did what's suitable for your kid. We kept our student in Alg1 since our student felt it's appropriate fit. What seems to be the problem here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We got the same email. Superintendent Reed has been really pushing to get more kids through Alg I by 8th. So each year one of the requirements is removed. Last year they did away with the Iowa assessment. Now I guess they're nixing the SOL requirement as well. Our kid is in level IV but we opted out of Alg I this year because it would have been virtual at our school (not great for a kid with pretty bad ADHD). But good to know we don't need to stress about the SOL anymore.
Superintendent Reed is answering the needs of advanced students, as requested by us the parents. You opted out and did what's suitable for your kid. We kept our student in Alg1 since our student felt it's appropriate fit. What seems to be the problem here?