Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 20:36     Subject: Re:military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

"Leave no soldier behind" is a fraudulent, empty slogan.

Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 14:38     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Pedolph Shitler is brilliant! Carry on...
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 14:35     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:you think this iran war is being driven by cost savings goals? It literally is costing billions a week and no one seems to know why we are doing it in the first place.



But why all the expense to rescue ONE guy?

This is the part that boggles my mind. How is anyone worth that?


morale and leadership

DCUM elites know nothing about that, they live for every man for themselves. lets import more cheap labor


Airmen who get shot down are losers. Pedolph Shitler himself said that.


He said he preferred soldiers who weren't captured by the enemy,.actually.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 11:11     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:you think this iran war is being driven by cost savings goals? It literally is costing billions a week and no one seems to know why we are doing it in the first place.



But why all the expense to rescue ONE guy?

This is the part that boggles my mind. How is anyone worth that?


morale and leadership

DCUM elites know nothing about that, they live for every man for themselves. lets import more cheap labor


Airmen who get shot down are losers. Pedolph Shitler himself said that.


I can assure you that Democrats would not have left anyone to die in a terrorist country without attempting rescue.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 11:05     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:you think this iran war is being driven by cost savings goals? It literally is costing billions a week and no one seems to know why we are doing it in the first place.



But why all the expense to rescue ONE guy?

This is the part that boggles my mind. How is anyone worth that?


morale and leadership

DCUM elites know nothing about that, they live for every man for themselves. lets import more cheap labor


Airmen who get shot down are losers. Pedolph Shitler himself said that.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 10:52     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


What a terrible place to be, where we have to choose whether to believe the lying, propagandist Iranian regime, or the lying, propagandist US government.

In this case, I wouldn't believe the Iranians unless they can show proof. If they have 6 of our soldiers, show us that you have them. Which is not to be confused with believing the Americans, either; the operation, as described, makes no damn sense to me.


The US hasn't provided any evidence either other than the implausible Hollywood story they communicated.


Which is understandable, IMO. I wouldn't expect the US to parade any seriously injured soldiers to satisfy our curiosity. I can't remember if we have consistently released names of the wounded during our previous "not a war", but I am okay with their names not being released (I do believe that we have a lot more injured soldiers and casualties are being covered up, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if this story is entirely fictional either).

I feel that Iran has the easier path to prove that the US admin is lying through its teeth.


Agree that we don't release names of all those injured. You do realize that were many, many injured when those 13 were killed in the Afghanistan withdrawal?
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 10:11     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


What a terrible place to be, where we have to choose whether to believe the lying, propagandist Iranian regime, or the lying, propagandist US government.

In this case, I wouldn't believe the Iranians unless they can show proof. If they have 6 of our soldiers, show us that you have them. Which is not to be confused with believing the Americans, either; the operation, as described, makes no damn sense to me.


The US hasn't provided any evidence either other than the implausible Hollywood story they communicated.


Which is understandable, IMO. I wouldn't expect the US to parade any seriously injured soldiers to satisfy our curiosity. I can't remember if we have consistently released names of the wounded during our previous "not a war", but I am okay with their names not being released (I do believe that we have a lot more injured soldiers and casualties are being covered up, and it wouldn't surprise me in the least if this story is entirely fictional either).

I feel that Iran has the easier path to prove that the US admin is lying through its teeth.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:54     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


What a terrible place to be, where we have to choose whether to believe the lying, propagandist Iranian regime, or the lying, propagandist US government.

In this case, I wouldn't believe the Iranians unless they can show proof. If they have 6 of our soldiers, show us that you have them. Which is not to be confused with believing the Americans, either; the operation, as described, makes no damn sense to me.


The US hasn't provided any evidence either other than the implausible Hollywood story they communicated.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:49     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


What a terrible place to be, where we have to choose whether to believe the lying, propagandist Iranian regime, or the lying, propagandist US government.

In this case, I wouldn't believe the Iranians unless they can show proof. If they have 6 of our soldiers, show us that you have them. Which is not to be confused with believing the Americans, either; the operation, as described, makes no damn sense to me.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:45     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

If only we invested in our healthcare in the same way.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:43     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


C’mon. If true, this would 100% have leaked by now.

Iranians are FOS.


If true, the pilot's name would have been leaked by now.

Per usual, Trump and Hesgeth are FOS.


Absolutely not. Totally different circumstances.

What exactly are your motives here? Ugly, ugly posts.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:39     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


C’mon. If true, this would 100% have leaked by now.

Iranians are FOS.


If true, the pilot's name would have been leaked by now.

Per usual, Trump and Hesgeth are FOS.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:36     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:This thread is in poor taste, and just parroting BS from on of the Iranian LEGO videos.

You can hate the war without debating a dollar value of an individual soldier. Gross.


Oh Please. The operation was a f’ing disaster. Anyone with any military experience or understanding of the situation knows this. At best this was a Pyrrhic victory.

Now any time a pilot is shot down all military operations by the US will stop in region. All assets will be deployed in a hap hazardous manner making them easy targets and resulting more losses.

You would sacrifice a carrier group for one person. After all there is no price that is too high to pay for one US pilot. I guess you would have surrendered to Iran if the pilot was captured?
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:33     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?


C’mon. If true, this would 100% have leaked by now.

Iranians are FOS.
Anonymous
Post 04/07/2026 09:26     Subject: military experts: how does the US justify spending so much $$$ to rescue ONE soldier?

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s naive to think politics doesn’t play any role in the lengths DoW will go to save a downed crew. Think about it - they don’t save him, massive amount of egg on DJT’s face. Of course they’re willing to spend hundreds of millions of taxpayer money for the priceless headlines of “The Daring Rescue of a downed Crewman”. No brainer. Yes, it’s also the right thing to do…. But it’s also politically necessary.


Except the Iranians are saying we lost, and the US left behind, six soldiers.

WTH are we to believe? The LEGOs or the US?