Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Work takes me all over the world. Not my money, not my problem.

If it’s not your money, then your high airline status isn’t the flex you think it is.

It most certainly is or you wouldn’t be working so hard to invalidate it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Work takes me all over the world. Not my money, not my problem.

If it’s not your money, then your high airline status isn’t the flex you think it is.

It most certainly is or you wouldn’t be working so hard to invalidate it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Work takes me all over the world. Not my money, not my problem.

If it’s not your money, then your high airline status isn’t the flex you think it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sean Duffy regularly lectures Americans on what to do. Here’s a sample.

- **Have more children** (he and his wife have 9 kids and he says reversing low birth rates is a national priority)
[CNN: Trump’s transportation secretary is prioritizing funds based on birth and marriage rates](https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/30/politics/transportation-funds-birth-marriage-rates-invs)<grok:render card_id="2f766c" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">1</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Prioritize marriage and family over career in your 20s**
[Institute for Family Studies: Secretary Duffy’s Bold Move to Boost Marriage and Births](https://ifstudies.org/blog/secretary-duffys-bold-move-to-boost-marriage-and-births)<grok:render card_id="0564dc" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">11</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Direct federal policy/incentives to reward communities and states with higher birth rates**
[PBS News: Transportation head Duffy’s directive to tie funds to birth rates](https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/transportation-head-duffys-directive-to-tie-funds-to-birth-rates-could-hinder-blue-states)<grok:render card_id="ee3ee3" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">3</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Teach real civics and genuine patriotism in schools (not “woke” versions)**
[USDOT: U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy Defunds Woke University Grants](https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/us-transportation-secretary-sean-p-duffy-defunds-woke-university-grants)<grok:render card_id="b1e883" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">38</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Stay patient with high prices and economic challenges while the administration fixes them**
[Conservative News Journal: Transportation Secretary Duffy: Trump team targets affordability](https://conservativenewsjournal.com/transportation-secretary-duffy-trump-team-targets-affordability-for-american-dream/)<grok:render card_id="e10827" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">40</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Embrace traditional American culture and values instead of “degrading” ones**
[Fox News: Fox News contributor Sean Duffy reveals the 'honor' and joy of Christmas Day](https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/fox-news-sean-duffy-honor-joy-christmas-day)<grok:render card_id="f12ad0" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">50</argument>
</grok:render>

- **Stop relying on government handouts and focus on hard work and family**
[BrainyQuote: Sean Duffy Quotes](https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/sean-duffy-quotes)<grok:render card_id="37de9d" card_type="citation_card" type="render_inline_citation">
<argument name="citation_id">60</argument>
</grok:render>

All excellent points.

In contrast, you twits approve of open borders, sex-change operations for illegals, no-ID voting, free drugs for addicts, men in women’s sports, governance by autopen, doxing ICE agents….

No, we don't support open borders. This is a right wing myth.
Sex change operations for illegals happened when Trump was president.
"No ID voting" has worked in our country for 250 years. If you want to make ID frees for all eligible voters, then sure, but otherwise, it is a poll tax and not a constitutional requirement.
"free drugs for addicts" is a way of weening people off of drugs. It also mitigate petty theft of addicted people to get some money to buy a fix.
We support civir rights and the ability for trans athletes to live a normal life. this should be dealt with on a case by case basis as most trans athletes (all like 200 of them in the country) are not the same and not in the same sports or competitions.
Trump, Bush and other presidents have used autopens. Do you think they each actually sign tens of thousands of birthday, Christmas and wedding cards themselves? Trump used an autopen to pardon the J6ers. Should those pardons be rescinded because of it?
ICE agents should be willing to do their jobs without being masked and unidentified. There are people out there posing as ICE agents kidnapping people because the public cannot tell the difference between the real ones and the fake ones. That isn't doxxing.

Anonymous wrote:It’s a flying bus. I’m dressing however I want.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Work takes me all over the world. Not my money, not my problem.

Anonymous wrote:Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Anonymous wrote:When air travel feels luxurious, I’ll dress for the occasion.

In the meantime, these evil and uncivilized people wearing designer suits as they behave like teenage trolls can sit right down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

The advantage to flying economy is the giving the airlines as little of your money as possible. And that’s definitely worth it.

With high enough airline status people pay what you do, but sit up front and sip champagne.

Which you get by… giving the airline more of your money. I’ll bet you’re a sucker for every Black Friday “sale” too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

The advantage to flying economy is the giving the airlines as little of your money as possible. And that’s definitely worth it.

With high enough airline status people pay what you do, but sit up front and sip champagne.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

The advantage to flying economy is the giving the airlines as little of your money as possible. And that’s definitely worth it.

With high enough airline status people pay what you do, but sit up front and sip champagne.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Add this to the many common-sense positions that Democrats feel compelled to oppose, and which will make more moderates think Democrats are crazy.

Being pro personal freedom is a Democratic position, I guess. Ladies and gentlemen, behold the Conservative party of living your life their (very rigidly defined) way or the highway!

Nobody is taking away your personal freedom. He is making a statement - a recommendation - with the thought that if you dress nicer you are more apt to behave more nicely while flying.

I am all for that. And, I think it is ridiculous for people to wear PJs on a plane, unless you are a child under the age of 3.

I am not a fan of pajamas as clothing, to be honest. But it isn't for Sean Duffy to say and he sounds like a moron saying it. And frankly I'd rather fly for the rest of my life with pajama clad people than live another minute with this Constitution-hating administration.

Airlines give out pajamas to business class passengers on long haul flights.

What’s classy if you’re rich and trashy if you’re poor?

Game on.

Jeans and a polo are OK, no matter what your financial status. Pajamas are not.

I swear, the left is a perfect picture of mental illness.

You should go to the airport and survey all the pajama-wearers about (i) where they attend high school and (ii) who they voted for in 2024.

Why should I do that? Just take some pride in your appearance FFS.

When the airlines don't cram people into small seats on crammed airplanes and treat customers with respect, then maybe people will treat the flying experience with more respect. As it is, fying is not pleasurable, and being uncomfortablly dressed in uncomotable seats makes it worse. The bigger issue, of course, is that the federal government should have no role in how people dress.

You must be one of the poors. I board first, my seats are big and comfy, my drinks are free and the crew leaves a thank you note on my seat before boarding.

I fly in expensive but comfortable business casual clothing because I have this odd quality called self respect.

One advantage of economy is not having to sit next to cartoonishly smug vulgarity like this. Money can’t buy you class.

There is no advantage to economy.

The advantage to flying economy is the giving the airlines as little of your money as possible. And that’s definitely worth it.