Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As one of the poor kids at a wealthier college: sort of. It's not that I didn't socialize with wealthy kids, but those of us who came from poorer families did know each other from the common job/money making rounds. We gave tours, did event staff work, business studies, etc.
There were also crowds I definitely couldn't afford to hang out with. My freshman year roommate would go out on Friday nights and drop a ton of money on things. So we didn't socialize much because I couldn't afford her lifestyle.
This!!
If you have to manage your own spending money and help pay for college, you are not dropping $50-100 each weekend on activities, you are finding ways to spend only $10-15 total (or less). When I was in college, my friends and I (most of us on work-study and limited $) would order pizza at the "right time on Sunday night" in hopes of getting it for free (there was a 30 min delivery guaranteed that was not possible to meet 100% of time on Sunday nights when everyone on campus was getting dinner as the dining halls were closed on Sunday night). about 40-50% of the time we got dinner for free. So I wasn't hanging with people going out Fri and Sat nights to spend $ and then out to dinner on Sunday, I simply didn't have the $
Anonymous wrote:As one of the poor kids at a wealthier college: sort of. It's not that I didn't socialize with wealthy kids, but those of us who came from poorer families did know each other from the common job/money making rounds. We gave tours, did event staff work, business studies, etc.
There were also crowds I definitely couldn't afford to hang out with. My freshman year roommate would go out on Friday nights and drop a ton of money on things. So we didn't socialize much because I couldn't afford her lifestyle.
Anonymous wrote:Why don't people already realize this? People don't become friends just because you all go to and pay admission at the same school. There are tons of cliques and by college age people are out of their elements so they gravitate to who/what they know. So that means people in the same circles of expensive private school, people from same city/town/neighborhood, same social class, etc. Who do you know? and the name game are very popular ice-breakers in college right after where are you from?
Anonymous wrote:Why don't people already realize this? People don't become friends just because you all go to and pay admission at the same school. There are tons of cliques and by college age people are out of their elements so they gravitate to who/what they know. So that means people in the same circles of expensive private school, people from same city/town/neighborhood, same social class, etc. Who do you know? and the name game are very popular ice-breakers in college right after where are you from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It happens….some can afford concerts, spring break trips, nicer apartments and fancy dinners out. I don’t think it completely precludes larger and more diverse friend groups, but tighter cliques do form as a result of income levels.
This already acts as a natural filter in the dating pool.
It does. Which means the dating pool for rich girls is absolutely tiny. It's euro-trash and wall street nepos. Most aren't finding happiness and a good one there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, 100%
My son is at any Ivy and reports that all NYC private school kids and boarding school kids stick together. Several of them have parents who bought houses near the Ivy
that sit mostly empty (freshman year) but that the kids use to party. Also they get local country club memberships for their 4 years and the kids all play golf together.
My kid attended a top private and has been invited to party and golf, etc but told me "They're fine but I don't want my entire social experience to revolve around them" --because apparently it's a pretty all-consuming group.
this is pretty common at most schools in T20.
In general, society is already divided. Just look at the neighborhood and zoning
+1 this is just how America works.
This is how it works everywhere.
True, the rich separate them selves everywhere. Vacation spots, hobbies, neighborhoods, clothing brands. It’s everywhere when you pay attention.
And? Go get yourself the best education you can get and make a living and a life for yourself. Some people are going to go off to their ski houses or some tropical island over winter break and so what?
The key issue is connection—this is what really matters for ambitious middle-class students. If those expensive, prestigious private schools can't provide meaningful connections, the return on investment is too low, especially for middle-class families who are likely paying close to full tuition.
This mentality is so sad. So many ambitious middle-class students succeed without anything having to do with connections. This “connections or bust” view is so myopic.
+1
Anonymous wrote:For example, do wealthy students often stick together — they tend to hang out on luxury private islands and build their own exclusive networks?[/
Yes
Anonymous wrote:Ime yes. I was a Mc kid at a wealthy school. I drove home 12 hours for spring break. Some of the people I know chartered a private plans to fly to a tropical island. That sort of thing. It wasn’t always easy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, 100%
My son is at any Ivy and reports that all NYC private school kids and boarding school kids stick together. Several of them have parents who bought houses near the Ivy
that sit mostly empty (freshman year) but that the kids use to party. Also they get local country club memberships for their 4 years and the kids all play golf together.
My kid attended a top private and has been invited to party and golf, etc but told me "They're fine but I don't want my entire social experience to revolve around them" --because apparently it's a pretty all-consuming group.
this is pretty common at most schools in T20.
In general, society is already divided. Just look at the neighborhood and zoning
+1 this is just how America works.
This is how it works everywhere.
True, the rich separate them selves everywhere. Vacation spots, hobbies, neighborhoods, clothing brands. It’s everywhere when you pay attention.
And? Go get yourself the best education you can get and make a living and a life for yourself. Some people are going to go off to their ski houses or some tropical island over winter break and so what?
The key issue is connection—this is what really matters for ambitious middle-class students. If those expensive, prestigious private schools can't provide meaningful connections, the return on investment is too low, especially for middle-class families who are likely paying close to full tuition.
This mentality is so sad. So many ambitious middle-class students succeed without anything having to do with connections. This “connections or bust” view is so myopic.
Anonymous wrote:At the SLAC we just visited, we were given the following stats:
Percentage of students who work an on-campus job: 80%
Percentage of students who receive financial aid (which often includes on-campus job role as part of the package): 56%
My initial read of this was that working is pretty normalized, even for a decent junk of full-pay students. I liked that.
Anonymous wrote:Are there many other parents who can afford to pay for fancy college break trips but don't? We're planning to pay for all of DD's college-related expenses and she generally wants for nothing, but we've told her that she'll be expected to pay for any college trips with friends from money she earns herself even though we could afford to foot the bill. We're ready to be the lone mean parents, but it sure would be nice if there were one or two other kids in the same boat.