Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?
Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.
LOL No.
Class of 2029:
Emory acceptance rate with gaming: 15%
Washu < 12%
Notre Dame 9%
Georgetown: 12%
USC: 10.4%
Nice try with this pathetic garbage
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?
Yeild is 40%. Emory is more selective than WashU, Notre Dame, USC, Umich, Uva, and Georgetown, UNC etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?
Anonymous wrote:
ND has been a solid T20 forever. Emory not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
So why is the yield and selectivity still so bad compared to these other schools a decade later?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.
how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce
Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.
Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.
https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6
You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.
Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.
You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth
What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"
… who has been preapproved….
where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply
and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.
Preapproval does not mean a hard cutoff. For URM that stats is qualifying for medical school.
At WashU they do weed out premed students. Your table shows there are only 200+ applicants per year.
He was white. Not sure what you mean by weedout. if you mean classes being difficult sure, but that happens at every school. It certainly isn't happening at the application stage.
Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
Anonymous wrote:Emory haters are so weird. It's been a decade of this, yet still T25. Just say you're bitter that your DC was rejected. Emory has better outcomes for many subjects compared to its peers. Emory has better finance/ IB placement than WashU, Vandy, and Rice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.
how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce
Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.
Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.
https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6
You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.
Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.
You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth
What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"
… who has been preapproved….
where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply
and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.
Preapproval does not mean a hard cutoff. For URM that stats is qualifying for medical school.
At WashU they do weed out premed students. Your table shows there are only 200+ applicants per year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.
how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce
Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.
Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.
https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6
You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.
Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.
You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth
What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"
… who has been preapproved….
where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply
and I say this because my son's friend had a low GPA and MCAT (sub 3.5 and 500) and still received support to apply.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emory doesn’t have committee approval. Anyone can apply. Other schools would not allow low stats to apply. 3.7/510 gets 85% acceptance rate.
how about you compare 3.7/510 for other schools then. this is a farce
Other schools wouldn’t write committee letter if they don’t think you have a chance. Hard to find data on this for other schools. If you have any information, please share.
Washu has no committee but has a 85% acceptance rate. Plenty of schools like this. 65% is pathetic.
https://wustl.app.box.com/s/kogpybkjk8qkfou07a5lpzql5452law6
You're an idiot it says right there that the avg is a 3.7 and a 512.
Yes, 85% of all premed applicants at wustl have those stats. So are premeds at emory dumber? yes.
You're trying too hard. WashU gives committee letters, Emory does not.
https://prehealth.wustl.edu/application-support-letter-service-myprehealth
What the hell is this? WUSTL literally states "We do not rank applicants; we support everyone"
… who has been preapproved….
where does it say preapproved? it's well known everyone at wustl can apply