Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Lack of education and morals. Swayed by a con man and propaganda to “own the libs”, These people fall right into a cult. The irony is that his dumbest followers are ones who will be left hurting by the time this is over.

The people whose top political stance is that children who aren’t old enough to drive or get a tattoo should have the broad right to mutilate their bodies with the help of the medical system because of a religious belief in the transmutation of their gender soul are in no position to be calling anyone cultists. Or dumb, for that matter.

The above poster is the perfect example of an uneducated follower who falls for Fox News propaganda. I don’t know one person whose “top political stance” is allowing kids to “mutilate their bodies.” Rather than blindly letting Fox News scare you into believing Dems want this - along with taking all your guns away, opening the borders for rapists and murderers, aborting newborns, stealing all the white people’s jobs, eating neighborhood cats, etc etc - why not do some actual reading and learning about our real agenda (spoiler - they are none of the above). You might learn something about humanity, society and integrity. So again, lack of education and propaganda is what leads to blind following.

You are a cultist.

And I’m not a Republican, and your Fox News line is stupid and ignorant. I’m a very disillusioned Democrat who is appalled at what my party supports, and who has literally read and understood the horrifyingly bad studies used to prop up medicalized youth gender transition.

You are the one lacking humanity and integrity. You are the one who is grotesquely anti-science. You are the one who has adopted radical religious beliefs and demanded the Democrats adopt a cult gender religion as its party platform, exiling and purging anyone who even tried to raise the mildest alarm.

And all of us outside of your cult can see it. But you have made strict adherence to your cult beliefs a loyalty test to the Party, and you are so deep in your cult radicalism that you will sacrifice the entire Party before you admit the horror of what you’ve supported.

And THAT is why people think that vile corrupt fascist in the White House is good, because it’s people like you that are the comparison.

This is exactly the point. You are democrat and you freely criticize the democrat policies and democrat politicians. I'm with you on much of that. The point is republicans don't vocally criticize their leaders or even policies they don't agree with.

If you say both sides are wrong about some policies. Yes both sides are. But if you say both sides care about ethical leaders. No, republicans don't care about having ethical leaders.

Find me a Democratic politician that has been speaking openly and without party condemnation about the lack of medical ethics or science behind medicalized youth gender care. Show me the speeches, the strong stands taken, the fight to stop iatrogenic harm to children. Show me the Democratic politicians condemning the blue state laws that allow a parent’s refusal to medicalize their child to be an argument against custody. Show me the Democratic politician that has spoken out against allowing teens to get medicalized gender affirming care without parental consent. Show me the Democratic political leaders that fought to stop what is going to be seen on fifty years as a horrifying medical scandal perpetrated against the most vulnerable of children. And then, if you can even find a single Democratic politician to do this, show me how that politician was supported by the supposedly good party for their strong moral and ethical stance to protect children. Show me the Democratic leaders that protected those brave politicians.

Once you’ve done that, maybe I’ll believe you about how the Democrats are so ethical, so upstanding, so interested in protecting the vulnerable, so good. Until then, no.

Oh, I see now. This isn't really about Democrats at all, you are just the raving anti-trans poster that keeps periodically popping up to try and hijack every thread to want it to be about your hatred of trans people until you end up getting kicked off or getting the thread locked.

Ugh. That poster is on so many threads, obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing. All their posts are the same thing over and over, like a hamster stuck on a wheel. It’s simultaneously boring and tragic.

Nobody has that level of single-issue, burningly obsessive hatred unless it’s an issue that affects them personally. The “refusal to medicalize child being an argument against custody” and “medicalized gender care without parental consent” is such an oddly specific hill to die on. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a custody battle going on over a child who’s questioning their identity.

You can continue to believe there is a single person who posts about this at your peril. Certainly that’s what the Democrats want to believe, even if it destroys them again and again in the voting box.

There is an article in the NYT on this topic today and the comments are overwhelmingly on the side of what you ignorantly believe is a single person here at DCUM. But sure, it’s just one person. 🙄

Hey now, stick to the approved DCUM narrative.

One of my deep frustrations about trans rights as an issue is precisely this inability to recognize and acknowledge just how isolated and out of touch people like DCUM Democrats are on the issue of trans rights. Trump is destroying this country and yet DCUM Democrats refuse to accept reality.

Look at the comments on this article: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/13/us/politics/democrats-transgender-rights.html

They are overwhelmingly on the side of the posters that PPs insist are lone wolves, obsessed, isolated, etc. Do the PPs believe all of these comments are a single person spamming the NYT? Do they credibly believe DCUM Democrats represent an electoral majority of any sort on this issue? It’s flatly delusional.

Anonymous wrote:The reason people compare Trump to hitler is because it’s similarly hard to understand why someone clearly so purely venal and awful had such support.

It’s not remotely similar to why people liked Biden. Thats like me asking someone why they like living off grid in a burned out school bus in the Yukon and them saying ‘well why do you like cruises? Euw’

If you read about the things Hitler and the Nazi party did to take control of the German government and get people behind them, whipping them into a frenzy about perceived enemies, the similarities to what Trump is doing are stark and unnerving. It’s absolutely correct to say that he is following Hitler’s playbook, unwittingly or not.

Anonymous wrote:He's VERY good compared to traditional politicians who are basically the worst most insincere and dishonest entities in existence.

Counterpoint: he’s one of the worst human beings on the planet, is unimaginably ignorant, is definitely the worst president, and now there is infighting in his own party about whether not he a serial child molester.

He represents the newest + most boorish human instincts. People love that.

Anonymous wrote:He's VERY good compared to traditional politicians who are basically the worst most insincere and dishonest entities in existence.

“I voted for Trump because he’s honestly dishonest.”

👌🏼

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Lack of education and morals. Swayed by a con man and propaganda to “own the libs”, These people fall right into a cult. The irony is that his dumbest followers are ones who will be left hurting by the time this is over.

The people whose top political stance is that children who aren’t old enough to drive or get a tattoo should have the broad right to mutilate their bodies with the help of the medical system because of a religious belief in the transmutation of their gender soul are in no position to be calling anyone cultists. Or dumb, for that matter.

The above poster is the perfect example of an uneducated follower who falls for Fox News propaganda. I don’t know one person whose “top political stance” is allowing kids to “mutilate their bodies.” Rather than blindly letting Fox News scare you into believing Dems want this - along with taking all your guns away, opening the borders for rapists and murderers, aborting newborns, stealing all the white people’s jobs, eating neighborhood cats, etc etc - why not do some actual reading and learning about our real agenda (spoiler - they are none of the above). You might learn something about humanity, society and integrity. So again, lack of education and propaganda is what leads to blind following.

You are a cultist.

And I’m not a Republican, and your Fox News line is stupid and ignorant. I’m a very disillusioned Democrat who is appalled at what my party supports, and who has literally read and understood the horrifyingly bad studies used to prop up medicalized youth gender transition.

You are the one lacking humanity and integrity. You are the one who is grotesquely anti-science. You are the one who has adopted radical religious beliefs and demanded the Democrats adopt a cult gender religion as its party platform, exiling and purging anyone who even tried to raise the mildest alarm.

And all of us outside of your cult can see it. But you have made strict adherence to your cult beliefs a loyalty test to the Party, and you are so deep in your cult radicalism that you will sacrifice the entire Party before you admit the horror of what you’ve supported.

And THAT is why people think that vile corrupt fascist in the White House is good, because it’s people like you that are the comparison.

This is exactly the point. You are democrat and you freely criticize the democrat policies and democrat politicians. I'm with you on much of that. The point is republicans don't vocally criticize their leaders or even policies they don't agree with.

If you say both sides are wrong about some policies. Yes both sides are. But if you say both sides care about ethical leaders. No, republicans don't care about having ethical leaders.

Find me a Democratic politician that has been speaking openly and without party condemnation about the lack of medical ethics or science behind medicalized youth gender care. Show me the speeches, the strong stands taken, the fight to stop iatrogenic harm to children. Show me the Democratic politicians condemning the blue state laws that allow a parent’s refusal to medicalize their child to be an argument against custody. Show me the Democratic politician that has spoken out against allowing teens to get medicalized gender affirming care without parental consent. Show me the Democratic political leaders that fought to stop what is going to be seen on fifty years as a horrifying medical scandal perpetrated against the most vulnerable of children. And then, if you can even find a single Democratic politician to do this, show me how that politician was supported by the supposedly good party for their strong moral and ethical stance to protect children. Show me the Democratic leaders that protected those brave politicians.

Once you’ve done that, maybe I’ll believe you about how the Democrats are so ethical, so upstanding, so interested in protecting the vulnerable, so good. Until then, no.

Oh, I see now. This isn't really about Democrats at all, you are just the raving anti-trans poster that keeps periodically popping up to try and hijack every thread to want it to be about your hatred of trans people until you end up getting kicked off or getting the thread locked.

Ugh. That poster is on so many threads, obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing. All their posts are the same thing over and over, like a hamster stuck on a wheel. It’s simultaneously boring and tragic.

Nobody has that level of single-issue, burningly obsessive hatred unless it’s an issue that affects them personally. The “refusal to medicalize child being an argument against custody” and “medicalized gender care without parental consent” is such an oddly specific hill to die on. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a custody battle going on over a child who’s questioning their identity.

+1. I am glad someone else noticed this. That poster is really tedious. I'm going to start reporting them and hopefully they will go find another forum to plague.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Lack of education and morals. Swayed by a con man and propaganda to “own the libs”, These people fall right into a cult. The irony is that his dumbest followers are ones who will be left hurting by the time this is over.

The people whose top political stance is that children who aren’t old enough to drive or get a tattoo should have the broad right to mutilate their bodies with the help of the medical system because of a religious belief in the transmutation of their gender soul are in no position to be calling anyone cultists. Or dumb, for that matter.

The above poster is the perfect example of an uneducated follower who falls for Fox News propaganda. I don’t know one person whose “top political stance” is allowing kids to “mutilate their bodies.” Rather than blindly letting Fox News scare you into believing Dems want this - along with taking all your guns away, opening the borders for rapists and murderers, aborting newborns, stealing all the white people’s jobs, eating neighborhood cats, etc etc - why not do some actual reading and learning about our real agenda (spoiler - they are none of the above). You might learn something about humanity, society and integrity. So again, lack of education and propaganda is what leads to blind following.

You are a cultist.

And I’m not a Republican, and your Fox News line is stupid and ignorant. I’m a very disillusioned Democrat who is appalled at what my party supports, and who has literally read and understood the horrifyingly bad studies used to prop up medicalized youth gender transition.

You are the one lacking humanity and integrity. You are the one who is grotesquely anti-science. You are the one who has adopted radical religious beliefs and demanded the Democrats adopt a cult gender religion as its party platform, exiling and purging anyone who even tried to raise the mildest alarm.

And all of us outside of your cult can see it. But you have made strict adherence to your cult beliefs a loyalty test to the Party, and you are so deep in your cult radicalism that you will sacrifice the entire Party before you admit the horror of what you’ve supported.

And THAT is why people think that vile corrupt fascist in the White House is good, because it’s people like you that are the comparison.

This is exactly the point. You are democrat and you freely criticize the democrat policies and democrat politicians. I'm with you on much of that. The point is republicans don't vocally criticize their leaders or even policies they don't agree with.

If you say both sides are wrong about some policies. Yes both sides are. But if you say both sides care about ethical leaders. No, republicans don't care about having ethical leaders.

Find me a Democratic politician that has been speaking openly and without party condemnation about the lack of medical ethics or science behind medicalized youth gender care. Show me the speeches, the strong stands taken, the fight to stop iatrogenic harm to children. Show me the Democratic politicians condemning the blue state laws that allow a parent’s refusal to medicalize their child to be an argument against custody. Show me the Democratic politician that has spoken out against allowing teens to get medicalized gender affirming care without parental consent. Show me the Democratic political leaders that fought to stop what is going to be seen on fifty years as a horrifying medical scandal perpetrated against the most vulnerable of children. And then, if you can even find a single Democratic politician to do this, show me how that politician was supported by the supposedly good party for their strong moral and ethical stance to protect children. Show me the Democratic leaders that protected those brave politicians.

Once you’ve done that, maybe I’ll believe you about how the Democrats are so ethical, so upstanding, so interested in protecting the vulnerable, so good. Until then, no.

Oh, I see now. This isn't really about Democrats at all, you are just the raving anti-trans poster that keeps periodically popping up to try and hijack every thread to want it to be about your hatred of trans people until you end up getting kicked off or getting the thread locked.

Ugh. That poster is on so many threads, obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing. All their posts are the same thing over and over, like a hamster stuck on a wheel. It’s simultaneously boring and tragic.

Nobody has that level of single-issue, burningly obsessive hatred unless it’s an issue that affects them personally. The “refusal to medicalize child being an argument against custody” and “medicalized gender care without parental consent” is such an oddly specific hill to die on. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a custody battle going on over a child who’s questioning their identity.

You can continue to believe there is a single person who posts about this at your peril. Certainly that’s what the Democrats want to believe, even if it destroys them again and again in the voting box.

There is an article in the NYT on this topic today and the comments are overwhelmingly on the side of what you ignorantly believe is a single person here at DCUM. But sure, it’s just one person. 🙄

Hey now, stick to the approved DCUM narrative.

He's VERY good compared to traditional politicians who are basically the worst most insincere and dishonest entities in existence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Lack of education and morals. Swayed by a con man and propaganda to “own the libs”, These people fall right into a cult. The irony is that his dumbest followers are ones who will be left hurting by the time this is over.

The people whose top political stance is that children who aren’t old enough to drive or get a tattoo should have the broad right to mutilate their bodies with the help of the medical system because of a religious belief in the transmutation of their gender soul are in no position to be calling anyone cultists. Or dumb, for that matter.

The above poster is the perfect example of an uneducated follower who falls for Fox News propaganda. I don’t know one person whose “top political stance” is allowing kids to “mutilate their bodies.” Rather than blindly letting Fox News scare you into believing Dems want this - along with taking all your guns away, opening the borders for rapists and murderers, aborting newborns, stealing all the white people’s jobs, eating neighborhood cats, etc etc - why not do some actual reading and learning about our real agenda (spoiler - they are none of the above). You might learn something about humanity, society and integrity. So again, lack of education and propaganda is what leads to blind following.

You are a cultist.

And I’m not a Republican, and your Fox News line is stupid and ignorant. I’m a very disillusioned Democrat who is appalled at what my party supports, and who has literally read and understood the horrifyingly bad studies used to prop up medicalized youth gender transition.

You are the one lacking humanity and integrity. You are the one who is grotesquely anti-science. You are the one who has adopted radical religious beliefs and demanded the Democrats adopt a cult gender religion as its party platform, exiling and purging anyone who even tried to raise the mildest alarm.

And all of us outside of your cult can see it. But you have made strict adherence to your cult beliefs a loyalty test to the Party, and you are so deep in your cult radicalism that you will sacrifice the entire Party before you admit the horror of what you’ve supported.

And THAT is why people think that vile corrupt fascist in the White House is good, because it’s people like you that are the comparison.

This is exactly the point. You are democrat and you freely criticize the democrat policies and democrat politicians. I'm with you on much of that. The point is republicans don't vocally criticize their leaders or even policies they don't agree with.

If you say both sides are wrong about some policies. Yes both sides are. But if you say both sides care about ethical leaders. No, republicans don't care about having ethical leaders.

Find me a Democratic politician that has been speaking openly and without party condemnation about the lack of medical ethics or science behind medicalized youth gender care. Show me the speeches, the strong stands taken, the fight to stop iatrogenic harm to children. Show me the Democratic politicians condemning the blue state laws that allow a parent’s refusal to medicalize their child to be an argument against custody. Show me the Democratic politician that has spoken out against allowing teens to get medicalized gender affirming care without parental consent. Show me the Democratic political leaders that fought to stop what is going to be seen on fifty years as a horrifying medical scandal perpetrated against the most vulnerable of children. And then, if you can even find a single Democratic politician to do this, show me how that politician was supported by the supposedly good party for their strong moral and ethical stance to protect children. Show me the Democratic leaders that protected those brave politicians.

Once you’ve done that, maybe I’ll believe you about how the Democrats are so ethical, so upstanding, so interested in protecting the vulnerable, so good. Until then, no.

Oh, I see now. This isn't really about Democrats at all, you are just the raving anti-trans poster that keeps periodically popping up to try and hijack every thread to want it to be about your hatred of trans people until you end up getting kicked off or getting the thread locked.

Ugh. That poster is on so many threads, obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing. All their posts are the same thing over and over, like a hamster stuck on a wheel. It’s simultaneously boring and tragic.

Nobody has that level of single-issue, burningly obsessive hatred unless it’s an issue that affects them personally. The “refusal to medicalize child being an argument against custody” and “medicalized gender care without parental consent” is such an oddly specific hill to die on. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a custody battle going on over a child who’s questioning their identity.

You can continue to believe there is a single person who posts about this at your peril. Certainly that’s what the Democrats want to believe, even if it destroys them again and again in the voting box.

There is an article in the NYT on this topic today and the comments are overwhelmingly on the side of what you ignorantly believe is a single person here at DCUM. But sure, it’s just one person. 🙄

Anonymous wrote:Because a lot of people would vote for Heinrich Himmler if it meant lower taxes.

This is rich coming from Free $h1t Army central here at DCUM!

Because a lot of people would vote for Heinrich Himmler if it meant lower taxes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To me, one hint that a lot of this stuff is pageantry is how they fake-decline the pronouns, like there's so much right to explaining how to us third-person singular masculine or feminine pronouns. "Here, just so you have it handy, the object form is 'him.'" {I nod thoughtfully and record it in my notebook.} Additionally, the common practice of doing "he/him/his" and "she/her/hers" is grammatically really weird. The only way these three pronouns make sense is if the order they go in is subject/object/independent possessive pronoun. But it makes no sense to provide an independent possessive pronoun (which is used only infrequently) while not listing the dependent possessive pronoun (which is used all the time). The reason, of course, is because people don't want to say "she/her/her" or "she/her/her/hers", so they just go with what sounds good and pretend it's oh so grammatically rigorous.

I will have unimaginable respect for the first person I see whose email signature block says "he (but no declensions please)." I will buy he a drink!

What is this mumble jumble?

Grammar Nazi.

The reason people compare Trump to hitler is because it’s similarly hard to understand why someone clearly so purely venal and awful had such support.

It’s not remotely similar to why people liked Biden. Thats like me asking someone why they like living off grid in a burned out school bus in the Yukon and them saying ‘well why do you like cruises? Euw’

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why? Lack of education and morals. Swayed by a con man and propaganda to “own the libs”, These people fall right into a cult. The irony is that his dumbest followers are ones who will be left hurting by the time this is over.

The people whose top political stance is that children who aren’t old enough to drive or get a tattoo should have the broad right to mutilate their bodies with the help of the medical system because of a religious belief in the transmutation of their gender soul are in no position to be calling anyone cultists. Or dumb, for that matter.

The above poster is the perfect example of an uneducated follower who falls for Fox News propaganda. I don’t know one person whose “top political stance” is allowing kids to “mutilate their bodies.” Rather than blindly letting Fox News scare you into believing Dems want this - along with taking all your guns away, opening the borders for rapists and murderers, aborting newborns, stealing all the white people’s jobs, eating neighborhood cats, etc etc - why not do some actual reading and learning about our real agenda (spoiler - they are none of the above). You might learn something about humanity, society and integrity. So again, lack of education and propaganda is what leads to blind following.

You are a cultist.

And I’m not a Republican, and your Fox News line is stupid and ignorant. I’m a very disillusioned Democrat who is appalled at what my party supports, and who has literally read and understood the horrifyingly bad studies used to prop up medicalized youth gender transition.

You are the one lacking humanity and integrity. You are the one who is grotesquely anti-science. You are the one who has adopted radical religious beliefs and demanded the Democrats adopt a cult gender religion as its party platform, exiling and purging anyone who even tried to raise the mildest alarm.

And all of us outside of your cult can see it. But you have made strict adherence to your cult beliefs a loyalty test to the Party, and you are so deep in your cult radicalism that you will sacrifice the entire Party before you admit the horror of what you’ve supported.

And THAT is why people think that vile corrupt fascist in the White House is good, because it’s people like you that are the comparison.

This is exactly the point. You are democrat and you freely criticize the democrat policies and democrat politicians. I'm with you on much of that. The point is republicans don't vocally criticize their leaders or even policies they don't agree with.

If you say both sides are wrong about some policies. Yes both sides are. But if you say both sides care about ethical leaders. No, republicans don't care about having ethical leaders.

Find me a Democratic politician that has been speaking openly and without party condemnation about the lack of medical ethics or science behind medicalized youth gender care. Show me the speeches, the strong stands taken, the fight to stop iatrogenic harm to children. Show me the Democratic politicians condemning the blue state laws that allow a parent’s refusal to medicalize their child to be an argument against custody. Show me the Democratic politician that has spoken out against allowing teens to get medicalized gender affirming care without parental consent. Show me the Democratic political leaders that fought to stop what is going to be seen on fifty years as a horrifying medical scandal perpetrated against the most vulnerable of children. And then, if you can even find a single Democratic politician to do this, show me how that politician was supported by the supposedly good party for their strong moral and ethical stance to protect children. Show me the Democratic leaders that protected those brave politicians.

Once you’ve done that, maybe I’ll believe you about how the Democrats are so ethical, so upstanding, so interested in protecting the vulnerable, so good. Until then, no.

Oh, I see now. This isn't really about Democrats at all, you are just the raving anti-trans poster that keeps periodically popping up to try and hijack every thread to want it to be about your hatred of trans people until you end up getting kicked off or getting the thread locked.

Ugh. That poster is on so many threads, obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing and obsessing. All their posts are the same thing over and over, like a hamster stuck on a wheel. It’s simultaneously boring and tragic.

Nobody has that level of single-issue, burningly obsessive hatred unless it’s an issue that affects them personally. The “refusal to medicalize child being an argument against custody” and “medicalized gender care without parental consent” is such an oddly specific hill to die on. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s a custody battle going on over a child who’s questioning their identity.

Anonymous wrote:Trump is good because he sacrificed billions and nearly his life to help the country.

Ludicrous nonsense. He didn't sacrifice billions. He enriched himself and his family massively, whether violating the emoluments clause and use of Trump Hotel as a pay-to-play access scheme for foreign diplomats, he overcharged Secret Service by 5x the allowable government per-diem rate when they were on required detail at his countless visits to Mar a Lago and his own golf resorts, he fast tracked China trade deals for Ivanka, he got the Saudis to give Jared $2 billion dollars, Don Jr. formed a private club called "Executive Branch" that charges $500k a head for membership and access, the $500m deal for a Trump Org resort in Oman, plus other real estate deals in Jeddah Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the $150m memecoin scam and other crypto ventures, the Qatari bribe of a $400m luxury jet, in short you have absolutely got to be kidding me. Trump did more corrupt scamming and grifting than any President of our lifetimes and here you dishonestly want to claim he "sacrificed." GTFOH.

And "nearly his life?" Oh spare us. Trump isn't the only President that people tried assassinating. There were multiple assassination attempts and threats against Bill Clinton including shots fired on the White House lawn in 1994 and a bomb plot in Manila in 1996. George W. Bush had a grenade thrown at him during a speech in Georgia in 2005, thankfully it didn't go off. There were at least 11 assassination plots against Obama, from ricin-laced letters to armed right wing extremists. Joe Biden had numerous threats including someone trying to ram a truck through the White House gates in 2023.

You really are in a bubble. You really are in a cult, if you earnestly believe everything you're posting here. It's long past due time for you to wake the hell up from it.