Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool, cool. None of these options changes where we’re zoned so I guess I go by who my kids classmates will be…/
What neighborhood are you in?
Somerset. All options have us still at BCC. I’m happy about that
None of the options had Whitman students going elsewhere as I recall. Maybe some of them should be taken cross county and not to a magnet program for equity.
Anonymous wrote:Just reminding everyone that every option is going to have people within walking distance of one school sent to a different school further away, and neighbors on neighboring streets zoned to different schools. That's inevitable due to the geography of where schools are located and the nature of boundaries. It is true of some people now and will be true of different people in different options. The fact that it is true of you personally in one or another of the options does not make that option any worse than the others. Feel free to complain that you personally don't like it, but please try to restrain yourself on the "this is a terrible option because my family happens to be the ones close to X school who have to take a bus somewhere further away."
Anonymous wrote:I listened to the zoom call and did not like the happy/cheery attitudes of the speakers. This is very disruptive to people’s families with all the bussing across county in option 3 and they are laughing and so proud of all their tools.
That seemed incredibly tone deaf to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool, cool. None of these options changes where we’re zoned so I guess I go by who my kids classmates will be…/
What neighborhood are you in?
Somerset. All options have us still at BCC. I’m happy about that
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Option 3 has got to be the throw away option.
It has united DCUM in opposition to it.
Do you think those lower income clusters are going to benefit from being shipped across town? Do you think their parents want the extra commuting time and costs, much less to be surrounded by a bunch of affluent families who most definitely don't want it? I think the universal feedback is people want to attend local schools in their neighborhoods that aren't overcrowded. If they can enhance diversity and minimize overcrowding around the edges, then great! Anything else is an exercise in social engineering and will make just about everyone unhappy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Option 3 has got to be the throw away option.
It has united DCUM in opposition to it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cool, cool. None of these options changes where we’re zoned so I guess I go by who my kids classmates will be…/
What neighborhood are you in?
Anonymous wrote:I have not read all 11 pages, because I cannot believe all of you are so ridiculous to think that any of these are a final option, or anything close to it. Have you never been part of a bounday study? This is step 1, show options that represent each of the 4 factors. Step 2 will show some balance (one can only hope, as usually step 2 is shown at the same time as step 1).
This has been a huge waste of time to date
Anonymous wrote:I have not read all 11 pages, because I cannot believe all of you are so ridiculous to think that any of these are a final option, or anything close to it. Have you never been part of a bounday study? This is step 1, show options that represent each of the 4 factors. Step 2 will show some balance (one can only hope, as usually step 2 is shown at the same time as step 1).
This has been a huge waste of time to date
Anonymous wrote:Option 3 has got to be the throw away option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Garrett Park to Wheaton commute is also a nightmare.
Garrett Park Council recently voted on this and unanimously approved their support of option #3.