Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

So, given that this is an 11-year path laid out here (1yr PG, 1 yr NAPS, 4 yrs USNA, 5 yrs active duty - if you dont want to pay back the entirety of your tuition, assuming you make it through to graduation), I get the yikes. But, thats some first class education in those first 6 yrs, and the careers following the 5 yr commitment are definitely pretty strong options-wise and AI-resilient wise. So, I can see why that's not a yikes for the player or his family.

Anonymous wrote:The first 2027 SJC has revealed themselves as either a total cheat by doing the future reclass fraud or by reclassing and transferring but still competing down bc they are not a 2028 yet. Congratulations, you still aren’t very good. Let us know what d2 school gets you.

Wouldn't he be better off playing a 27 schedule this summer to get more college eyes on him?

The first 2027 SJC has revealed themselves as either a total cheat by doing the future reclass fraud or by reclassing and transferring but still competing down bc they are not a 2028 yet. Congratulations, you still aren’t very good. Let us know what d2 school gets you.

Did anyone else see the GZ graduation banner with the “and #42 too” on the bottom. Way to make the entire graduation about your kid who didn’t do much on the field all year. Cornball

Anonymous wrote:PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Yikes.

Anonymous wrote:Lacrosse is a fieldsport, after all. Just like all the field sports the higher up you go in playing level from high school to pro, the more important speed and quickness are. Very few of, the local kids will get significant playing minutes at their D1 schools due to this aspect.

I agree with this right up to the end. Speed training makes a big difference and in fact is very complementary to putting on size (ever see a sprinter? friggin hulking). If someone wants to get faster and have better footwork while muscling up, they totally can. Comes down to the commitment. If they want it, it's doable. So, can't agree with the blanket statements bc who TF knows who wants it that much and who doesn't? It's one reason the portal is so valuable to coaches - proven desire once away from parental influence.

Ok

Lacrosse is a fieldsport, after all. Just like all the field sports the higher up you go in playing level from high school to pro, the more important speed and quickness are. Very few of, the local kids will get significant playing minutes at their D1 schools due to this aspect.

The GZ lsm was not good this year, put on too much weight due to the weight training, and lost some of his speed. He was not nearly as dominant as when he was a sophmore or junior.

All the best to him at Yale. He will need to get faster if he ever wants to step on the field.

PG year first. Then NAPS. Then Navy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

I seriously spit out my drink reading this 😅. I watched that Heights kid play 1 game and he is the best HS lacrosse player I’ve seen since Jack Myers at Gonzaga in 2018.

He was 100% undoubtedly, undeniably, without question the WCAC POTY. Probably best HS player in 5-10 years.

And btw he just committed to Navy!

This is a satire post, right. C'mon Richie, don't try so hard.

Comparing 5'10" 180 lbs lsm at the Heights vs 6'4" 210 at GZ is an insult. Myers led a loaded Gonzaga team for 4 years in assists and is the all-time everything at GZ.

Good player. Happy this worked out for the kid and the family and Navy did a good thing. Welcome to NAPS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

I seriously spit out my drink reading this 😅. I watched that Heights kid play 1 game and he is the best HS lacrosse player I’ve seen since Jack Myers at Gonzaga in 2018.

He was 100% undoubtedly, undeniably, without question the WCAC POTY. Probably best HS player in 5-10 years.

And btw he just committed to Navy!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SJC is on an aggressive recruiting rampage.

Heard they brought in a transfer from an MIAA program.

Speaks works during the summer.

How’d that work out for them this spring? Couldn’t even make it out of the quarterfinals.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the transfer was a starting attackman for a mid tier program in the MIAA this year.

He is a senior transfer.

not the best looking move by Wes

+1 and its why 2027s and 2028s have departed ways.

ok coach. lmao

Anonymous wrote:SJC is on an aggressive recruiting rampage.

Heard they brought in a transfer from an MIAA program.

Speaks works during the summer.