Anonymous wrote:Same story, proclaiming this will be SJC's or Potomac's year. Just never materializes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Because they haven’t beat GC in years. Have to give GC benefit of the doubt.

No fan of GC, or their coach, but agree with this.

Anonymous wrote:Because they haven’t beat GC in years. Have to give GC benefit of the doubt.

Anonymous wrote:Top and second tiers are clear for next Spring:

Top Tier (in no particular order)

GC
SR
SSSAS

Second Tier

SJC
Potomac
Visi

Inter-league schedules and play will be interesting. Lots of good 2029s distributed across the top ISL and WCAC programs; we will see if any make an immediate impact.

Anonymous wrote:It’s going to come down to the Saints and Stone Ridge this year. GC has the edge in the WCAC and not likely to lose to any conference foes. Feel free to come back to this post in May. I told you so….

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

SJC midfielders were tiny and got over-powered by the bigger, stronger, more athletic midfields from the top schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

SJC midfielders were tiny and got over-powered by the bigger, stronger, more athletic midfields from the top schools.

how tall are the SJC midfielders?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

SJC midfielders were tiny and got over-powered by the bigger, stronger, more athletic midfields from the top schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Watch out for SJC!!! Didn't lose much and very strong Freshman Class. Those seniors last year along with their new coach changed the culture of SJC Girl's lacrosse for the foreseeable future. No mean girls!

GC will handle them like last year.

I'm hearing otherwise. The pendulum swings in the WCAC this year.

Delusional- Biggest holes at St. John's are the goalie position and midfield.

Rational post ahead: First, I would say that GC should still be favored to defend their title again. That said, the PP is far from "delusional". Your critiques also miss the mark.

The SJC goalie is solid, returning for senior year, and their midfield is far from a weakness. All three starting midfielders made all-conference, two as freshmen, and their returning senior captain was, and will be again, a legit WCAC POY candidate. You may want to review your scouting card there.

Does the WCAC select POY from the 2nd or 3rd place team?

POY last year played at PVI.

odd

Not odd if you paid attention, player is now at Florida and did everything for her team but play goalie. GC was riddled with injuries during the year and no player really stood out. GC coach didn't even nominate anyone from his team.

The odd thing is that you can never find the awards/all conference teams anywhere online? The WCAC rarely updates their web site.